Probably their best policy..keep the conspiracy theories going, because they have nothing to fight Trump in the elections.
Releasing the report would make that go away then surely. Win win for everyone?Probably their best policy..keep the conspiracy theories going, because they have nothing to fight Trump in the elections.
Can we just all take a moment to confirm its Scouse who has jumped to gassing people and then repeats the lie till it becomes the truth.Even if they did have something to fight him in the elections presumably you could just gas them anyway?
Enemy within, and all that.
You're the one who brought up turning on the "Enemy Within" and "Corporate Lackeys".Can we just all take a moment to confirm its Scouse who has jumped to gassing people and then repeats the lie till it becomes the truth.
Bit like the democrats and Russians.
Looks like bomberman's getting worked up.
Soon changed his tune on releasing it though.Jeaus christ.
Its just becoming beyond pathetic.
Their 2020 candidates are unelectable, so lets just change the narrative to conspiracy.
How long can they do this before Trump actually starts looking the sensible one.
He has said lets release the full report, a two year 30 million dollar report and its just a farce at the end.
'We've got nothing....oh well maybe something...Im not saying this..Im not saying that...release it then!
Oh well, there might be..but.
Just pantomime, all of it.
He left his cat litter tray full of turds.Ive forgotten what he did.
Was it rapey or revealing Clinton emails Russia..just say both words in a sentence and let everybody decide.
Anyway I've heard he can make it to the Russian embassy if he can off ground all the way
So we can find out if what he said was true all along? That we'll extradite him?Please be true
Even if that's true, I don't care.The rapey, unwashed slime only releases what suits his agenda.
It does. And wikileaks has altered its 'leaks' in the past to make them look worse.You seem to be so wrapped up in the possibility of Russian interference that it's blinding you to the fact that if our government and the US government was acting in an ethical manner then Russia would have to continue to publish lies, rather than truth, to subvert our democracy.
What does what?It does. And wikileaks has altered its 'leaks' in the past to make them look worse.
How he gets the information, how he spins it, how he publishes it, yadda yadda yadda. Its doesn't matter - If. It's. True....
If it's not true, fair enough. Auntie makes mistakes but you don't jumpt to deliberate conspiracy there. But you're showing your hand (Anti-anyone-who-helped-Trump, which comes above all other considerations, regardless if they're more important than the current, temporary, US president).Sometimes it isn't and he helped elect Trump. Specifically. He wouldn't contemplate releasing anything about Trump or the GOP in the election cycle.
Now who's leaping to supposition to justify his own point of view.And he's a rapist.
How many times do I have to keep saying it? Wikileaks hasn't done that since 2012. Assange has served Putin's interests since he got his show on RT. Leaks are only directed at Putin's targets. What did it do for the Panama Papers or the 2016 leak of Russian data? Fuck all. Wouldn't touch them.Wikileaks performs a necessary function in that regard.
No. That's just common sense. Trump is the worst US candidate in living memory and a criminal.You're almost as rabidly anti-trump as Job is pro-trump. There's a bigger picture to be seen.
Respectfully, I disagree here.Partisan transparency isn't transparency at all.
Yep. It's dangerous. It's a separate issue from the above, of course (ethical actions of governments). You're looking at it from an electioneering standpoint - I'm looking at it from a "how do governments act" standpoint.And if transparency is fundamental to democracy why aren't you more up in arms about the dark facebook ads that were used heavily by the brexit and trump campaigns, like in the video I posted last night? A whole election campaign can be waged with no scrutiny whatsoever. Lies can only be seen by the intended target and can't be challenged by the opposing side or the media because they can't even know it exists. That is dangerous to democracy.
(and yes I would say the same thing if the other side used them).