Wij
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2003
- Messages
- 18,233
You and your crazy “maths” :/Here on planet Earth “less than a third” isn’t “more than half”.
You and your crazy “maths” :/Here on planet Earth “less than a third” isn’t “more than half”.
<b>Insert rolleyes</b>
Buh?Is that all youve got.
Yes it is , it would seem.
Is that all youve got.
So from now on when I say most people voted for Trump I have to put a note.
Of those who voted allowing for the electoral college weighting...or you'll pull schoolboy pedantics out as an argument because you havent got a real one.
You didn't say that. And it's not pedantism - it's called being accurate and factual.So from now on when I say most people voted for Trump I have to put a note.
Of those who voted allowing for the electoral college weighting...or you'll pull schoolboy pedantics out as an argument because you havent got a real one.
Yes. But it doesn't make what you said earlier anything other than utter proven shite.Trump won.
No. No they didn't. Less than 1/3rd did.More than half the country voted for him...
It's not an imaginary argument. Your actual words are right up there above your post.Your ..I want to win an imaginary argument
Your ..I want to win an imaginary argument approach directly parallels the cultural state we have got ourselves into..and an ever increasing swarm of uni droids being stamped out with citizen Smith right on programming is only going to make it worse before it gets better
He didn’t even get the most votes so he didn’t get half of those who DID vote. You are just wrong. (And yes I know he won. That’s not the same thing)Well no can ever have that if you want to include non voters can they..wtf are you lot even prattling on about.
I know you hate the fact that he won but arguing like schoolkids about it is a bit pointless.
But what about the babies..the babies would have voted for Hilary.
Well no can ever have that if you want to include non voters can they..wtf are you lot even prattling on about.
I know you hate the fact that he won but arguing like schoolkids about it is a bit pointless.
But what about the babies..the babies would have voted for Hilary.
You are just wrong. (And yes I know he won. That’s not the same thing)
you ya cunt said:More than half the country voted for him
It’s like arguing with a bucket of piss.Literally everyone vs Job and he still thinks he's right.
You're a dangerous human being.
Worse than Watergate:
https://www.justsecurity.org/62300/trumps-directing-cohen-lie-worse-watergate/
And that’s just part of what he’s done.
Do you even..you have extracted an argument from nothing to prove nothing.
He won with the majority of the vote..end of...wether that was due to electoral weighting or not.
Its the system and you even know how pathetic you are being, but are determined to take it to end.
For fuck’s sake you mong, he didn’t win the majority of the vote; that’s literally the opposite of what happened,
He won through the electoral college, which is an entirely different issue and leads to the opposite conclusion from the one you’re trying to make. The problem in America* is that the country voter’s vote is literally more valuable than an urban voter’s vote. It takes fewer country votes to deliver an electoral college vote than it takes for urban votes. This is a fundamental problem in American politics; as an absolute number there are always fewer “conservative” voters than “liberal” ones, and as urbanisation increases this only increases, but the lower population density conservative states can still maintain influence through gerrymandering. The truth is, the GOP only has a future by stacking the deck; if voting wards were comparable by absolute voter numbers Trump would never have got near the White House.
*This urban/country divide isn’t just an American problem but it’s most acute there.