SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,390
Just another revenue generator precursor, how much cash are they raising on the cameras is all they're after, no different than finishing a new river tunnel just to allow the introduction of a toll on the pre existing one. Anything he talks about transport related is only to dip into pockets.


Actual sensible public transport matters, meh, e.g.

Plus the report he's relying on is just as dodgy as the one the Welsh advocates relied on.

We have a couple of 20 mph zones round here. None enforced, and all ignored, as all silly rules should be.
 

Deebs

Chief Arsewipe
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 11, 1997
Messages
9,077,213
Ok, read this

In the UK, the government spent approximately £6.1 billion on national roads and £6 billion on local roads during the 2023/24 financial year. This figure is part of a larger transport expenditure of £26.8 billion on railways, £4.9 billion on local public transport, and £2.3 billion on other transport

Read my post earlier, so over £32 billion raised from motorists in the same year, where did the rest of the money go considering the state of our roads?
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,562
Ok, read this



Read my post earlier, so over £32 billion raised from motorists in the same year, where did the rest of the money go considering the state of our roads?
Yeah. Motorists get rinsed. That's a given.

Electric car owners will be too - no way the UK can give up that source of income.

It's like moving to cloud. Cheap at first then when you're there they whack up the cost.

Difference is, you can't relocate your car back on-prem.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,562
You fucking what?

no
From the gov.uk website:

Some 38 people from across the North East and Yorkshire have been fined hundreds of times the cost of an annual licence for fishing illegally

So, are you saying our elected representatives should be above the law?

If you're fishing, you need a licence. Whether you're chatting with the vice president or not, no?

On the beeb:

We do check, regularly, and we prosecute, always

So, Lammy should be prosecuted. We would pick up a criminal record. So should Lammy.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,562
Fined... you said arrested.
It's an arrestable offence. If the po-po rock up they could well arrest you*.

But regardless of the pedantism - you get a criminal record. Lammy should be prosecuted. There are administrative routes, but as the environment agency says above - they always prosecute.


*edit: And they arrest old people for praying and holding up signs nowadays. So fishing without a licence is akin to supporting Jimmy Savile eh? ;)
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
45,270
They arrest people for fishing without a licence. He should have a licence :)

It was a photo op, who cares, a full page story about this inane shit. I think there are slightly more important things in and around Vance's meeting with Starmer.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom