Embattle
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 13,239
If the Tories declared war on France, Embattle would still say it was because of the lack of opposition.
At the same time Labour declares war on its self.
If the Tories declared war on France, Embattle would still say it was because of the lack of opposition.
No. Bored of it and Richard Osman gets right on my tits.Is Pointless the best thing (Outside of the big drama shows) that the BBC airs on TV?
Who cares?At the same time Labour declares war on its self.
BTW - it's not a true statement. A correct description would be "publicly deciding on party policy".At the same time Labour declares war on its self.
If you piss in public, get filmed, don't whine about it ending up on porn sites.
Spanish women filmed urinating left humiliated by judge
Eighty women and girls were videoed by secret cameras, but a Spanish judge dismissed the case.www.bbc.co.uk
Whilst I sympathise - and I really do - there's no way of legislating against this without violating the principle of being able to film and photograph in public. So my answer to them would be the same as the judges: "tough titties ladies - you get your flaps out in public then that's the deal".
If you piss in public, get filmed, don't whine about it ending up on porn sites.
Spanish women filmed urinating left humiliated by judge
Eighty women and girls were videoed by secret cameras, but a Spanish judge dismissed the case.www.bbc.co.uk
Whilst I sympathise - and I really do - there's no way of legislating against this without violating the principle of being able to film and photograph in public. So my answer to them would be the same as the judges: "tough titties ladies - you get your flaps out in public then that's the deal".
Who cares?
If the Tories are a clear and present shitshow - impacting negatively in a very real way on people's lives and the economy - why are MORE people voting for them?
It's not rational.
We already do.Wow. So you'd quite like the right to film and photograph women who got caught short and had to go in public?
We already do.
You can't legislate that out without impacting other things. If an artist or journalist takes a photo of a group of women pissing on the pavement (or men) and publishes it in the papers with commentary then people wouldn't complain. It's the fact that some wanker published it to porn sites is the problem.
The solution is NOT to ban photography or filming what goes on in public. The clue is in the name - PUBLIC.
Anyone wants to tighten up legislation around porn sites? I don't really care about that - that's a different argument. But filming in public? Yeah - no problem with ANYTHING that you film in public - as is the law and has been for donkeys years.
@Big G do you still haunt?
We already do.
You can't legislate that out without impacting other things. If an artist or journalist takes a photo of a group of women pissing on the pavement (or men) and publishes it in the papers with commentary then people wouldn't complain. It's the fact that some wanker published it to porn sites is the problem.
The solution is NOT to ban photography or filming what goes on in public. The clue is in the name - PUBLIC.
Anyone wants to tighten up legislation around porn sites? I don't really care about that - that's a different argument. But filming in public? Yeah - no problem with ANYTHING that you film in public - as is the law and has been for donkeys years.
@Big G do you still haunt?
If someone took a photo of me - knob out - pissing up a wall on a saturday night out, and it made the national newspapers under the headline "look at this wankered scouse cunt pissing on the walls - what a disgusting situation" - I'd probably be a bit miffed.So you're telling me if you're in a public toilet taking a piss and someone took a photo of your nob (and your face) and plastered it all over the public domain you'd be completely cool with that?
If someone took a photo of me - knob out - pissing up a wall on a saturday night out, and it made the national newspapers under the headline "look at this wankered scouse cunt pissing on the walls - what a disgusting situation" - I'd probably be a bit miffed.
But it's fair. It's reporting what I'd done in public. And it's also totally legal - because I got my knob out in the public domain - so fair enough.
If someone posted it to a porn site so people could wank to it I honestly wouldn't be bothered enough to give a shit, but I realise others would. So the action is not "STOP PHOTOGRAPHS" - but it's potentially look at what porn sites are allowed to make money off.
Wrongly outraged.You're still chatting shit though, these women are rightly outraged at having explicit videos of them published, anywhere.
Wrongly outraged.
You do shit in public, then you take the consequences.
Agree Tom.There are, rightfully, limits to what you can do in public. I can't imagine many people would be too happy if someone got a big telephoto shot of a 2-year-old girl's privates, while she was squatting to pee in a public park.
As for the case in Spain, there's a difference between taking a general picture of someone having a pee down a secluded alley, and taking a telephoto or close-range shot of their genitals while doing so.
Apparently you doWho cares?
If the Tories are a clear and present shitshow - impacting negatively in a very real way on people's lives and the economy - why are MORE people voting for them?
It's not rational.
*gob smacked*
Lime fights back against QR code snatchers
The company says vandals have been peeling off QR codes to render its vehicles useless.www.bbc.co.uk
So now they will just paint over the plastic or something. Should have rfid on it not a qr code*gob smacked*
Lime fights back against QR code snatchers
The company says vandals have been peeling off QR codes to render its vehicles useless.www.bbc.co.uk
Galaxy chocolate is better than Dairy milk.
Fight me.