DaGaffer
Down With That Sorta Thing
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 18,627
How high is that?
Aiguille Du Midi - Mont Blanc (presumably). 3802m/12604ft.How high is that?
Where were ya?Pah, been higher on a bike![]()
Where were ya?
On @Job waiting for the void - I saw the queue, saw it from side on and then went "meh", and passed on. The beauty of the area is way more impressive than trying to scare yourself on a glass floor you know isn't going to break![]()
YepEuropean mountains just aren't all that.
Weent to climb it as a student but was too foggy the day we were there. I have been up by train though.My dad marched me up Snowdon when I was 6 - we were gone so long mum sent out a search party
Takes all sorts. Im not one of those sorts lol
Brrrrrr.View from near the top about three weeks ago:
View from pretty much the top:
![]()
Weent to climb it as a student but was too foggy the day we were there. I have been up by train though.
wouldnt be able to make it now with my back pain except by the train.
Mine was in response to snowdon from yoni and i have indeed taken the train a couple timesPuy de Dôme - Wikipedia
I climbed up that when I was 12, views were fantastic, but I learned a valuable lesson.
If there's a road up a mountain, take that instead
Although reading the article that is now closed to normal traffic (boo), but there is a railway instead. Worth checking out if you're ever in that part of France, the Volvic spring is not a million miles away, you can take in the (fucking scary) Charade F1 Circuit on the way, and there is a stonking golf course in Orcines on the shoulder. Awesome cheese from St Nectaire just up the road, I'd give the wine a miss tho, unless you're seasoning chips.
Taken from the Guardian today.
Funny when its brown people are being racist towards each other, its hostility not racism.
Careful use of wording to stop the bubble bursting.
Functioning as a subordinate ruling class, Indians in east Africa enjoyed success in business, finance and the professions throughout the colonial period, and gained significant control over the economy. By the time Kenya won its independence in 1963, Indians – who accounted for less than 3% of the population – owned more than two thirds of the country’s private non-agricultural assets.
When this group of Indians arrived in Britain, many brought with them the considerable wealth they had accrued (along with a hostility towards black Africans).
Ha yes...its us, we invented it...no hang on, we spent an empire fortune banning slavery and patroling the African coast to stop Arabs buying slaves.
Ha yes...its us, we invented it...no hang on, we spent an empire fortune banning slavery and patroling the African coast to stop Arabs buying slaves.
Inaccurate answer on a subject which isn't related to the topic.
I meant more the British Empire shoving lots of people into other parts of the Empire and letting them take up the well paid positions and stuff, something that you would condemn yourself if you were in Africa, then you can understand the resentment of the Indians after everything they were given/worked for disappeared, what's your reasoning for your racism?
Also, the British Empire ended slavery partially because of moral reasons, but the main reasons (as far as I'm concerned) was to stop other Empires from conducting in slavery so that Britain could easily maintain it's no. 1 position.
If the British Empire wanted to end slavery purely because of moral reasons then they would have got rid of the caste system in India, as that was pretty much slavery anyway.
Britain couldn't get rid of the caste system, the whole sub-continent would have gone up in flames as caste is embedded in Hinduism (an excerable religion); all they could do was mitigate some of its worst aspects.
You're also being overly cynical about the British slavery ban; there was genuine public support for the policy and it was one of the very earliest examples of a moral, rather than economic calculation in the Empire. Subsequent moral imperatives were far more likely to be excuses for maintaining Empire (white man's burden and all that bollocks) than anti-slavery.
I disagree, the British didn't want to get rid of the caste system because it benefited them, and as you rightly say, there wasn't much internal opposition to it, so why change it? If the British were taking the moral high ground they would sought to end all types of slavery across the Empire, not just the one getting the public attention.
If the British didn't have alternatives ways of making money to slavery do you think that they would have gone through with ending it? I don't think so. I think it's pretty cheap to say you have the moral high ground when you're enforcing the caste system in India and getting cities hooked on opium in China and then going to war when they (rightly so) get pissed off about it.
I'd say religion was the bigger factor in ending slavery, over morals anyway.