SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
I was in a traffic jam in Richmond park..I had to wait about 3 full minutes to cross the road that goes through the middle.

There were deer but surrounded constantly by a crowd of about 50 people taking photos.
 

Moriath

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
16,209
It does have some wonderful parks, I used Richmond and Bushy a lot although when looking out from Sawyer's Hill in Richmond park towards the center of London you can clearly see the pollution. I will missing the parks since about 2 weeks ago I moved to Devon, which needless to say I'm going to enjoy a lot more :p
I moved to cornwall 2 years ago and its so much nicer than the south east england.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Coogan is better but his smugness is not acting.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
ry13pzk8f7c31.jpg
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
I cant work out the climate model plot.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Whatever.
But why isnt the BBC and Ch4 and ITV facing impartiality fines.

Tbh ITV news is out foxing Foxnews for ludicrously biased presenting.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,411
Whatever.
Read: "I disregard Russia Today's admission of impartiality".

Fuck you @Job. It's right there from RT's own mouth. And you straight up disregard.

Bit why isnt the BBC and Ch4 and ITV facing impartiality fines.
Because they conform to the rules they're all judged on and RT doesn't.

You tit.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,094
Whatever.
But why isnt the BBC and Ch4 and ITV facing impartiality fines.

Tbh ITV news is out foxing Foxnews for ludicrously biased presenting.

Because everyone knows that they are impartial.

Apart from you and your loonies.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Why should I be bothered about RTs impartiality.
The fact that they have to sit there and watch the msm in Britain skew the news on a daily basis ...then why not join in.
The presenting for the ITV news is so utterly and disgustingly skewed by leading questions and opiniated segment introduction thats its a fucking masterclass in it.
Pulling faces, rolling eyes..youd be forgiven for thinking..yet again..most people would disagree, its hard not to draw conclusions..this may look like..its Jeremy Kyle level bullshit.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,411
Why should I be bothered about RTs impartiality.
*YOU* posted about the fine ffs!

And if you're now magically "not bothered" about news impartiality stop whining about ALL news sources.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,094
Why should I be bothered about RTs impartiality.

Because you have posted a few RT articles propping up your arguments.

As if they're in the interests of you and also Russia :O
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
They were just Galloway opinion pieces.
I mean they were fair balance against the fucking evil lying fucknuts who infest our mainstream media.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,094
They were just Galloway opinion pieces.
I mean they were fair balance against the fucking evil lying fucknuts who infest our mainstream media.

But think about why would the Russians want to portray that?

Think abouts who's national interests you're presenting.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
*YOU* posted about the fine ffs!

And if you're now magically "not bothered" about news impartiality stop whining about ALL news sources.
Ive all ready pointed out why Im not bothered, if they all got fined then the story would be ..why all this bias?
Its not..the story is, only they do it...which is an utter..utter fucking lie.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
But think about why would the Russians want to portray that?

Think abouts who's national interests you're presenting.
No its the other side of the argument..the thing we dont get in the UK.
 

Ormorof

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,920
Ive all ready pointed out why Im not bothered, if they all got fined then the story would be ..why all this bias?
Its not..the story is, only they do it...which is an utter..utter fucking lie.

Can you prove it?
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,411
Ive all ready pointed out why Im not bothered, if they all got fined then the story would be ..why all this bias?
Its not..the story is, only they do it...which is an utter..utter fucking lie.
No. They're measured against a set of features. Every single tedious BBC story goes:

1) This thing is happening.
2) This is the reason for it.
3) Shoehorn some idiot who says "no it isn't"

3) Is the mandatory dissenting voice for "balance" (even if they have to dig deep to find a crackpot to provide this "balance")

But every story conforms to this format because Auntie *has* to provide an opposing point of view.

RT doesn't. It tells you how (they think) it is - without providing a dissenting voice.

Low-IQ asshats love that - being told what to think with no dissenting opinion to confuse them.

Which is why you like RT.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
No. They're measured against a set of features. Every single tedious BBC story goes:

1) This thing is happening.
2) This is the reason for it.
3) Shoehorn some idiot who says "no it isn't"

3) Is the mandatory dissenting voice for "balance" (even if they have to dig deep to find a crackpot to provide this "balance")

But every story conforms to this format because Auntie *has* to provide an opposing point of view.

RT doesn't. It tells you how (they think) it is - without providing a dissenting voice.

Low-IQ asshats love that - being told what to think with no dissenting opinion to confuse them.

Which is why you like RT.
Bias reply defends bias.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom