I moved to cornwall 2 years ago and its so much nicer than the south east england.It does have some wonderful parks, I used Richmond and Bushy a lot although when looking out from Sawyer's Hill in Richmond park towards the center of London you can clearly see the pollution. I will missing the parks since about 2 weeks ago I moved to Devon, which needless to say I'm going to enjoy a lot more![]()
Both places have their shitholes and lovely bits.I moved to cornwall 2 years ago and its so much nicer than the south east england.
But one out numbers the other in the opposite ratio of the south east.Both places have their shitholes and lovely bits.
Still only 2k years out of 4 billion. Conjecture as to the cause or just a cycle or natural phenomenon. Lots of ‘reconstruction’ = estimation.Our impact on the environment is so small..
![]()
RT admit their impartiality @Job.
RT has previously argued it did not breach rules of due impartiality, partly since its viewers expect to see a pro-Russian viewpoint when they tune in to the station.
Read: "I disregard Russia Today's admission of impartiality".Whatever.
Because they conform to the rules they're all judged on and RT doesn't.Bit why isnt the BBC and Ch4 and ITV facing impartiality fines.
Whatever.
But why isnt the BBC and Ch4 and ITV facing impartiality fines.
Tbh ITV news is out foxing Foxnews for ludicrously biased presenting.
*YOU* posted about the fine ffs!Why should I be bothered about RTs impartiality.
Why should I be bothered about RTs impartiality.
They were just Galloway opinion pieces.
I mean they were fair balance against the fucking evil lying fucknuts who infest our mainstream media.
Ive all ready pointed out why Im not bothered, if they all got fined then the story would be ..why all this bias?*YOU* posted about the fine ffs!
And if you're now magically "not bothered" about news impartiality stop whining about ALL news sources.
No its the other side of the argument..the thing we dont get in the UK.But think about why would the Russians want to portray that?
Think abouts who's national interests you're presenting.
Ive all ready pointed out why Im not bothered, if they all got fined then the story would be ..why all this bias?
Its not..the story is, only they do it...which is an utter..utter fucking lie.
No. They're measured against a set of features. Every single tedious BBC story goes:Ive all ready pointed out why Im not bothered, if they all got fined then the story would be ..why all this bias?
Its not..the story is, only they do it...which is an utter..utter fucking lie.
Bias reply defends bias.No. They're measured against a set of features. Every single tedious BBC story goes:
1) This thing is happening.
2) This is the reason for it.
3) Shoehorn some idiot who says "no it isn't"
3) Is the mandatory dissenting voice for "balance" (even if they have to dig deep to find a crackpot to provide this "balance")
But every story conforms to this format because Auntie *has* to provide an opposing point of view.
RT doesn't. It tells you how (they think) it is - without providing a dissenting voice.
Low-IQ asshats love that - being told what to think with no dissenting opinion to confuse them.
Which is why you like RT.
Bias reply defends bias.