SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

[Bodhi]

#freedomofspeech and Facebook @Gwadien.

Elizabeth Warren wants to break it up because it's too powerful a censor.

Now the left want to protect their freedom of speech are you still all "but it's a private company so stfu"?

There's also stuff like this: Facebook Bans Zero Hedge

Although, if you want to figure out why, just read any of the articles they've posted recently about Facebook's dubious practices.

 

[Deebs]

Thank fuck for that, Boeing 737 Max banned from flying in UK airspace. Good to see Governments around the world not taking notice of the USA FAA saying it is a safe plane.

 

[Wij]

There's also stuff like this: Facebook Bans Zero Hedge

Although, if you want to figure out why, just read any of the articles they've posted recently about Facebook's dubious practices.

Facebook is very dubious I agree but I happen not to give a shit about it banning Zerohedge given that it is a Russian Propaganda outlet and can go fuck itself.

 

[Job]

Between minutes 1 and 3 if you CBA with all of it


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2gwFkCU1Q4

No fatbike tyres?

 

[Job]

I didnt need to see the picture to know she was white with short hair


BirthStrikers: meet the women who refuse to have children until climate change ends

 

[Scouse]

I didnt need to see the picture to know she was white with short hair


BirthStrikers: meet the women who refuse to have children until climate change ends

 

[Gwadien]

I didnt need to see the picture to know she was white with short hair


BirthStrikers: meet the women who refuse to have children until climate change ends

You know how that's weird?

Times that by Adolf Hitler and Alex Jones and then you have you.

 

[Scouse]

So what was the result of turning off who gave likes and whatnot experiment @Deebs?

 

[Job]

Been staying at my dads in Devon, he lives next to Bantham beach.

Went down for a morning walk and found dead Dolphin/Porpoise on the sand.

 

[Job]

Very good tech explanation of 5G.


View: https://youtu.be/GEx_d0SjvS0

 

[Deebs]

So what was the result of turning off who gave likes and whatnot experiment @Deebs?

Nothing really. Why?

 

[CorNokZ]

Nothing really. Why?

I miss the feature where I could see who liked or disagreed a post. Might just be me though

 

[Deebs]

I miss the feature where I could see who liked or disagreed a post. Might just be me though

Cos you responded so nicely.....

 

[Job]

Fresh Prince reimagined.
They should make a movie.


View: https://vimeo.com/322620538

 

[Scouse]

Nothing really. Why?

I was just wondering is all. Thought you might have had some grand plan.

How come you turned it off? Now it's back on, I'll try to keep an eye on how it makes me feel, or what behaviours it drives (if any).

 

[Gwadien]

Can you add a tool so we can rate ratings?

 

[Scouse]

Can you add a tool so we can rate ratings?

Actually I think it's interesting, is all. Maybe I'll learn something.

 

[Scouse]

New Puritanism.

Nice to see that "causes offence" is now being used to justify all sorts of shit.

Not such-and-such has taken offence, but what she's wearing is offensive.

Hey ho. Some people round here just don't seem to get how a lack of real freedom of speech, and the "causes offence" language that surrounds that bullshit, has real-world knock-on consequences.

 

[Job]

Like all airlines we have an appropriate clothing policy.

Wtf.

Its policies that are the problem..they use them like they are a law of the land.

I have a policy..ignoring your policy.

 

[Gwadien]

New Puritanism.

Nice to see that "causes offence" is now being used to justify all sorts of shit.

Not such-and-such has taken offence, but what she's wearing is offensive.

Hey ho. Some people round here just don't seem to get how a lack of real freedom of speech, and the "causes offence" language that surrounds that bullshit, has real-world knock-on consequences.

Should you be able to be naked then?

In all seriousness...

Airline has a rule, wear reasonable clothing (or what ever their wording is).

'Reasonable' is open to interpretation, former Nun head stewardess may have been on the blob and felt like being a bitch to a young attractive girl, company will apologise for human mistakes everyone moves on.

Why is everything an attack on freedom of speech now?

 

[Scouse]

Jesus christ @Gwadien. What's happened to you?

It's genuinely concerning that you're a teacher.

 

[DaGaffer]

New Puritanism.

Nice to see that "causes offence" is now being used to justify all sorts of shit.

Not such-and-such has taken offence, but what she's wearing is offensive.

Hey ho. Some people round here just don't seem to get how a lack of real freedom of speech, and the "causes offence" language that surrounds that bullshit, has real-world knock-on consequences.

Fucks' sake. We really are going back to the fucking Dark Ages.

 

[Gwadien]

Jesus christ @Gwadien. What's happened to you?

It's genuinely concerning that you're a teacher.

Nah, you're the one being pathetic, this shit happens -all- the time, but now suddenly in the modern Trump World it's an attack on Freedom of Speech, I'm sure Tommy Robinson will make a video pretty soon.

So much for snowflake lefties and their fake outrage.

 

[Scouse]

this shit happens -all- the time

Oh. That makes it OK does it?

Grow a pair. Stand up for what is right, whenever it happens. Like @DaGaffer said - welcome back to the dark ages. Rolled over by our teachers because it "happens all the time".

 

[Embattle]

Strange how the airline got its knickers in a twist over a crop top yet they tend to fail badly when it comes to serving even more booze to drunks, something that can actually affect plane safety.

 

[Gwadien]

Oh. That makes it OK does it?

Grow a pair. Stand up for what is right, whenever it happens. Like @DaGaffer said - welcome back to the dark ages. Rolled over by our teachers because it "happens all the time".

Yeah, individual people in companies may have fucked up views, when a team leader tells you one thing, you follow that rule.

I bet the company will apologise and compensate soon because of the reasons why you're upset.

What the fuck else do you want to happen? shut the airline down?

 

[Scouse]

Balls @Gwadien - THIS was your response:

Should you be able to be naked then?

In all seriousness...

Airline has a rule, wear reasonable clothing (or what ever their wording is).

Basically - it's reasonable for the airline to act like they did.

It's not reasonable. Not at all. Not as a company and not as individuals. We've absolutely regressed in the last 30 years.

 

[Gwadien]

Balls @Gwadien - THIS was your response:

Basically - it's reasonable for the airline to act like they did.

It's not reasonable. Not at all. Not as a company and not as individuals. We've absolutely regressed in the last 30 years.

Bullshit.

Answer my question then, should she be allowed to be naked?

 

[DaGaffer]

Bullshit.

Answer my question then, should she be allowed to be naked?

Whataboutery. She's clearly NOT even close to naked and is wearing clothes that wouldn't bat an eyelid anywhere in the UK (including plenty of churches these days) and definitely not on the average package holiday flight. I have no idea why you're even attempting to defend this.

 

[Scouse]

I have no idea why you're even attempting to defend this.

I think it's because I've made a reasonable link to the attitudes of the people in question and our current lack of freedom of speech and our resultant infantilised society.

He's grown up like this, and like the canary in the cage can't see the problem.

And because he supports the banning of things, and the idea that some things are intrinsically offensive (justifying his censorious nature), he's desparately getting his knickers in a twist trying to justifiy such utter utter bullshit. Reaching for retarded whatabouttery, like you said.

I made the point about him being a teacher because I doubt he's teaching the vital importance of rebelliousness to his children. In fact, in this case he's preaching conformity to some arbitrary rule.

But to humour you Gwad:

should she be allowed to be naked?

I wouldn't object personally, so if it was up to me - yes.

I feel bad for this guy. I wouldn't be offended by the sight of a naked human. It wouldn't put me off my dinner. I don't for a second think kids would be "damaged" by the sight of a naked man - in fact, I think parents use kids as an excuse in an attempt to force social norms that they're comfortable with on other people.

But it's not up to me. And currently it's illegal to run around naked. So, whilst I wouldn't be offended in the least if (either of) them rocked up on a plane flight naked, I can see enough people would object on reasonable grounds.

But that girl? Get tae fuck. There's nothing wrong, nothing "offensive" about how she was dressed (in clothing bought in the high street, meant for erm.. wearing). She was humiliated by wankers and the airline should rightly get a roasting for this.

The only 'pathetic' thing here is you didn't just go "what a shower of assholes".