SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,842
Yes. It is.

A warning. That they might read about allegations.

How do you feel about the fact that they printed a warning about that?

What do you mean?

I think it's more of a warning that the they're going to read allegations which relate to sexual abuse.

Isn't that the same as giving a warning before giving details on gory murders?
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,411
That awkward moment when the people left in your camp are the people who like to see dead muslim babies.

Javid criticised as IS bride's baby dies

Like @Job

Lots of babies dying in the queue in front of her. Two kids died in that camp on the same day as her baby. Make a case for getting all of the kids out of those camps as soon as possible, absolutely, but she gave up the right to special treatment over and above all those other people a long time ago.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,842
Lots of babies dying in the queue in front of her. Two kids died in that camp on the same day as her baby. Make a case for getting all of the kids out of those camps as soon as possible, absolutely, but she gave up the right to special treatment over and above all those other people a long time ago.

Yes, but as the child of a British Citizen...
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Lets see.
If you made knife crime a minimum 40 years in jail and actually killing someone life without parole.

Do you think that would reduce offending and obviously then reduce prison levels for knife offenders?

Id be fucking amazed to see teens carrying knives if they were facing forty years in jail...they carry onives because there is no consequence...and they need them because the other gangs have knives...because there is no consequence.

Im not saying put more people in jail..Im saying make the threat so real..its not worth the risk.
Atm its worth the risk..so people die and the prisons are full.
They should be nearly empty..with everyone deciding its just not worth it.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,842
Lets see.
If you made knife crime a minimum 40 years in jail and actually killing someone life without parole.

Do you think that would reduce offending and obviously then reduce prison levels for knife offenders?

Id be fucking amazed to see teens carrying knives if they were facing forty years in jail...they carry onives because there is no consequence...and they need them because the other gangs have knives...because there is no consequence.

Im not saying put more people in jail..Im saying make the threat so real..its not worth the risk.
Atm its worth the risk..so people die and the prisons are full.
They should be nearly empty..with everyone deciding its just not worth it.

No it doesn't reduce crime.

The kids that stab other kids don't give a fuck about prison, they just want to please the people that 'love' them, which is the gang leaders.

The gang leaders are fantastic at replacing kids families, because there's no opportunities in their world, especially when you can make a killing from drug dealing.

I suppose it comes down to what you want to achieve, you want to lock people for a very long time (and fuck them up for life) for very minor crimes which is mainly down to their situation, whereas I am in favour of preventing the crime.

Tories don't like that.

Tories like to give £500m of tax payers money to the private industry to look after our prisoners.

Isn't Theresa's Husband got a slice of cake in G4S or something?

I find chopping people's limbs off more civilised than locking people up for life for minor crimes.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,069
Lets see.
If you made knife crime a minimum 40 years in jail and actually killing someone life without parole.

Do you think that would reduce offending and obviously then reduce prison levels for knife offenders?
No.

They can lock prisoners up for five hundred years in america, but it hasn't made a dent in murder rates.

The evidence doesn't suggest what you would do would be effective. In fact, all the evidence points otherwise. Not to mention the many many other issues that doing that would cause (not even mentioning cost).

I wouldn't mind, but everyone's known exactly that for most of your lifetime. So why don't you?
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
They dont actually lock people up like that in America..its a myth, they have the same arguments about weak sentencing.
Most of the people in America in orison are for drug offences.
You will go down big time for financial crime unless you are powerful enough to get away with it.
10 years for tax offences is not exceptional.
They turned New York around from a crime hotspot to safer than London with zero tolerance.
Its the only thing that works..we put up with crime..we fill prisons, because we let everyone off..second chances..benefit of the doubt.
We all pay for that approach everyday..dead bodies..5 billion a year in security measures.
All to give toerags a second chance.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,842
They turned New York around from a crime hotspot to safer than London with zero tolerance.

I'm fairly sure that they put down the reduction in investing into the areas of New York that had the most crime, making it look decent and in response the people treated it with more respect.

Dunno, liberal media probably.

You're doing it again, you're a person that loves the UK, but you're going against another thing that is great about the UK, we're a small s socialist nation, we give a shit about people more than most countries, we invest into supporting areas that struggle, unlike America, I really don't understand how you can have an attitude of putting lots of poor people into an area, give them no opportunities in life, and then punish them by taking their lives away because they want to try to do something with their life.

It's fucking mental mate.

I've repeated this a million times before, knife crime isn't going up because of policing numbers, it's going up because of the MASSIVE cuts to social stuff to support these kids, but it's a fair game department to rip apart because its all background work rather than front line policing.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Its going up because of unfetered immigration without any policies in place to deal with the social breakdown and ghettoisation of London..which is where they mostly go.
We dont give a fuck about the immigrants and we dont give a fuck about the people whos areas are destroyed by it, if they havent got the money to get the fuck out of there on the white flight train.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,842
Its going up because of unfetered immigration without any policies in place to deal with the social breakdown and ghettoisation of London..which is where they mostly go.
We dont give a fuck about the immigrants and we dont give a fuck about the people whos areas are destroyed by it, if they havent got the money to get the fuck out of there on the white flight train.

DAMN there we go again, calling non-white people immigrants.

DAMN SON.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,842
#freedomofspeech and Facebook @Gwadien.

Elizabeth Warren wants to break it up because it's too powerful a censor.

Now the left want to protect their freedom of speech are you still all "but it's a private company so stfu"? :)

Or the left is trying to asset Governmental control over businesses.

Which as a person that loves the right to bear arms, surely that's equally as bad?
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,069
Or the left is trying to asset Governmental control over businesses.
Do you not think governmental control over monopolies that distort our democracy is a good thing?

Which as a person that loves the right to bear arms, surely that's equally as bad?
Don't see what relevance this has to do with a freedom of speech issue at all.

Could be why they're not all lumped under the same amendment eh? Because it's different...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom