The Israeli foreign ministry condemned the decision and accused Malaysia of anti-Semitism.
Which is what happens every time anyone even hints that they may think that Israel is a shitty country...
There's the inference, of course.It's funny how the article starts out with 'Malaysia, which is a Muslim majority country'
There's the inference, of course.
But unless I'm mistaken I don't see many christian-majority countries boycotting Israel.
That's optimistic IMO.I think in 20 years time the policies on Israel will change drastically, equally, I hope in 20 years time the Millennials in Israel will see what they're doing is wrong and they no longer have the need to behave in the way that they do.
That's optimistic IMO.
For me it's like brexit and Job - Israeli impunity seems to be emboldening them. The country is becoming more brazen in it's actions - and counties only do that when their populations let them.
Carrots are much cheaper and easier to stun.But think of all the Carrots you would kill!!!
Im pretty sure its over prescription of human antibiotics thats the problem, especially as hospitals have been using them instead of cleaning and disease spread prevention policies.To combat this I think we really should:
A) Stop intensive farming - which necessitates the application of antibiotics to cattle.
B) Eat less meat.
C) Pay a fair price for meat - so farmers can farm less cattle, with better welfare and health standards whilst being able to stay in business.
This would have the benefit of - a) bringing down carbon emissions, b) helping with the antibiotic resistance issue, c) help with the land-use-biodiversity-issue and d) help with our meat-heavy diet and health issues.
The negative would be loss of daily meaty nom-noms
But it's a no brainer. So why don't we legislate for it? Because of the above we already know we have to move to a more plant-based diet. We know we're not going to do it through choice...
Nope. Animal antibiotic use feed directly into human catastrophy. We use them like fucking retards.Im pretty sure its over prescription of human antibiotics thats the problem, especially as hospitals have been using them instead of cleaning and disease spread prevention policies.
in the US more than 70% of antibiotics that are medically important for humans are used in animals
So, basically, what I was saying in my first post.
Hill farming whilst 'traditional' blights the landscape. The Lake District has just been granted some UNESCO heritage status or something that means it's treeless sheep-farmed landscape is going to be hard to reform.
Wales, Scotland and the Lake District are, naturally, areas of deciduous forest.I disagree with this
Oh. BTW. Lol.Henry VIII destroyed most of the trees in the UK in order to build his fleet.
Wales, Scotland and the Lake District are, naturally, areas of deciduous forest.
Large scale sheep and pine farming in Wales & Lakes and Deer Estates in Scotland keep the land barren and take a massive toll on biodiversity.
Smaller scale sheep farming and focussed rewilding efforts would preserve some traditional lifestyle, increase (desparately needed) biodiversity and be more in keeping with necessary food goals.
Upsetting a handfull of the billions of humans on the planet to tip the scales back in natures favour, at the cost of a few hundred years of 'tradition*' is a small price to pay IMO.
*by tradition read: old industrial farming practice
Not saying switch to arable farming. I'm saying do less and re-wild.Switching to arable farming won't help biodiversity either, and relatively speaking, sheep farming is one of the lesser problems in animal farming (beef is, by far, the biggest problem) because while you may be right about the Lake District, in vast areas around the planet sheep are the only sustainable "product" on otherwise unusable land.
Not saying switch to arable farming. I'm saying do less and re-wild.
We use too much land. Part of our nutition goals is a plan to reduce our land use requirements. Blighty is a patchwork of land that's nearly all being used when the requirement from a biodiversity pov is that we use less...
You're right that the bigger problem is beef but sheep farming still requires farmland elsewhere being given over for feed, and keeps our uplands bare and (relative to what they could be) trashed.
One of the benefits of changing the diet is because it's inefficient use of land - huge amounts of land are given over to produce grain to feed cattle when less land could produce an equivalent number of (healthier and more environmentally friendly) calories...7 billion people and rising. Doubt we'll be decreasing land use any time soon.
Well if land is scarce, and we need to consider what we are growing, my suggestion is to fuck vegetables off as they are entirely pointless. I mean what fucking use are carrots to anyone?
Just grow some extra cows and bacon instead.
On a more serious note, whilst we are blighting the landscape with thousands of useless bird munching windmills in the name ofsubsidy farmingsaving the planet, I struggle to care too much about a few sheep stuck on a hill. It's great driving through the mountains of Wales or Scotland, seeing a sheep and wondering how the fuck he got up there.
Doing the same - did it all last year. (Skipped xmas because Thailand is made of sugar and pitching quickly into keto with a 4-day fast).Fuck off! Doing a keto diet at the moment and I need me meats and dairy
Nothing natural about it. Snowdonia is entirely an industrial landscape.Yeah, exactly, sheep have created the places of natural beauty over hundreds of years.