SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,384
Why not? Take what is considered to be a reasonable amount.

Whilst I do agree with you entirely, you do realise this argument is no different to suggesting someone pays as little tax as they are legally entitled to? :)
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,133
Whilst I do agree with you entirely, you do realise this argument is no different to suggesting someone pays as little tax as they are legally entitled to? :)

No.

Recieving less money than the Tory government finds acceptable is poverty.

Not paying tax that you are supposed to is immoral.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,522
Not paying tax that you are supposed to is immoral.
Evading tax is immoral (and illegal).

Avoiding tax is not only moral, but a legal requirement for businesses who have a statutory duty to maximise their returns for shareholders.

That's why I think it's particularly lame to discuss this using tems like "should" or "immorality" or "exploitative" when the onus is clearly on governments to set clear and unavoidable tax rules.

But considering we live in offshore tax haven UK that's a bit rich. The clamouring of the masses for fair taxation is resulting on a clampdown on the masses - so they can 'deel' like something is being done.

Meanwhile, IBM pays 1%, charges £2000/day for an engineer but UK pesants want contractors to pay 60% on £500/day when they already pay 25% - forcing them to take permie jobs, with IBM, which is a massive tax loss to the UK.

But your next-door-neighbour is poorer, so win.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,133
To clarify, as per previous post from yonks ago - I don't have a problem with people avoiding tax at lower levels - because they usually put most of their money back into the economy, my problem is the super rich people that have billions in the bank and still don't pay tax as they should.

Issue is, can't have one rule for one and one rule for another.

But comparing benefits money which people need to survive and people being a bit greedy is a bit weird imo.

Besides, since when was morality less important than law?

I know a drug dealer that makes cookies to give to people for free with arthritis and other things that weed can help with. He got arrested.

I know a bloke that cheated on his wife, bought her a house and made her and their kids homeless as soon as the kids were of age where he didn't have to legally support them anymore.

Morality > Law.
 

fettoken

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
9,640
Morality > Law.

Usually. Morality in the present becomes law. Example: It's immoral to shag animals, though, Sweden didn't legislate a ban until 2014 (weird fuckers). Another example is the legislation making it illegal to spread kiddy-porn around 1980 (in Sweden). Sweden was actually kiddy-porn liberal back in the 1970-1980's. Of course, that's never spoken of.
 

fettoken

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
9,640
From Kate Mccann biography:

"I asked Gerry apprehensively if he'd had any really horrible thoughts or visions of Madeleine. He nodded. Haltingly, I told him about the awful pictures that scrolled through my head of her perfect little genitals torn apart"

What the fuck?! Why aren't these guys in jail?
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,133
From Kate Mccann biography:

"I asked Gerry apprehensively if he'd had any really horrible thoughts or visions of Madeleine. He nodded. Haltingly, I told him about the awful pictures that scrolled through my head of her perfect little genitals torn apart"

What the fuck?! Why aren't these guys in jail?

No way.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,133
I mean, I'm not going to suggest that they had anything to do with it, but they sure as shit are cashing in on it.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,133
So I bought a two battery vape.

It worked fine for a long time.

Now for some reason, it appears to drain one of the battery slots (replaceable batteries) SUPER quickly, and the other seems to be fine.

Anyone got any ideas why?
 

Wij

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
18,404
Usually. Morality in the present becomes law. Example: It's immoral to shag animals, though, Sweden didn't legislate a ban until 2014 (weird fuckers). Another example is the legislation making it illegal to spread kiddy-porn around 1980 (in Sweden). Sweden was actually kiddy-porn liberal back in the 1970-1980's. Of course, that's never spoken of.
Erk :/
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,384
So I bought a two battery vape.

It worked fine for a long time.

Now for some reason, it appears to drain one of the battery slots (replaceable batteries) SUPER quickly, and the other seems to be fine.

Anyone got any ideas why?

Is it a Chinese no-name design or one of the Tobacco Company products (Blu/Vype/IQOS) etc? As if it's the first one, that is probably the issue :)
 

fettoken

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
9,640
Cleaning the recent search and browser-history before there's a social event at home & people go onto the web-browser and search for stuff..

I mean, how do i explain searching for "70's childrens pornography in Sweden" whereas it was just really research for a FH post.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Though of course they only won because the liberals kept calling for truce and the vietnamese used them to regroup, also they banned huge areas from combat.
The generals entered the war saying it was unwinable with the restrictions put on them by the hand wringers.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,133
Though of course they only won because the liberals kept calling for truce and the vietnamese used them to regroup, also they banned huge areas from combat.
The generals entered the war saying it was unwinable with the restrictions put on them by the hand wringers.

Oh my fucking lord.

Oh my fucking LORD.
 

BloodOmen

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
18,407
Though of course they only won because the liberals kept calling for truce and the vietnamese used them to regroup, also they banned huge areas from combat.
The generals entered the war saying it was unwinable with the restrictions put on them by the hand wringers.

 

Hawkwind

FH is my second home
Joined
Jul 5, 2004
Messages
7,541
£75m bonus boss walks off over pay question

This is so scum bag.

Modern houses are fucking awful quality and the companies sit on so much land when there's a massive housing shortage.

They usually sit on it awaiting county or local planning. Where we lived in Hampshire (years ago) the Prudential bought up large amounts of land around Micheldever (between Basingstoke and Winchester) but never got permission to build what would have been a new down around a small village.

The land developers who find the plots don't get their bonuses until the plots developed, seems like only the C level get theirs based on performance of criteria they themselves set. Which is what is really wrong with the system.
 

russell

FH is my second home
Joined
Apr 6, 2008
Messages
1,898
Seems like every spare piece of land near me is being built on. So much for the green belt.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,133
Nah @Hawkwind that's bollocks mate.

The majority sit on land until it's at a price where they will make maximum profit.

It's obvious too - I live in a housing estate that's extremely popular with Hindus and it's probably quadrupled in size over the last 6 years however houses have been promised in other parts of the city but never been completed simply because some areas are more profitable than others.

Then you have housing developers en mass building accomodation that the Chinese will pay £300 a week for and turf out locals, it's a disgrace.

Housing companies are actively participating in social engineering based on profits.
 
Last edited:

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Rubs hands together.
Yes..yes..let out your pain.
Join me on the dark side.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Oh my fucking lord.

Oh my fucking LORD.
Yes they sent young men to die in a war they knew they couldnt win.
They were told from the start places they couldnt bomb or conduct operations.
Alsi they were actually fighting the Russians..but thats another story.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Top Bottom