- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 12,457
Not in box... n00b!
Not in box... n00b!
Pat Butcher with her norks out, only on Amazon:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Garfunkel-Art-Fine-Print/dp/B00F4ZENO0/ref=sr_1_3?s=kitchen&ie=UTF8&qid=1420455434&sr=1-3&keywords=Garfunkel Art
Meh. The company took a model of my actual face for that mask...
You should sue them!
For too accurate a replica?
During an attack on an enemy stronghold, he was shot in the arm and in the face, losing his left eye and part of his ear. He received the Distinguished Service Order (DSO) for his exploits.
Speaking in 1964 Lord Ismay, who served alongside Carton de Wiart in Somaliland, described the incident:
"He didn't check his stride but I think the bullet stung him up as his language was awful.
I think my language would have been pretty foul in the same situation. Interesting read.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-30685433
Different times, different reasons for war. More valid than today'sI read that too, its all well and good, the guys a legend, but glorification of war much?
Nevertheless, it's still glorifying someone killing another.Different times, different reasons for war. More valid than today's
Nevertheless, it's still glorifying someone killing another.
Nevertheless, it's still glorifying someone killing another.
if they were on the right side.
But then you could argue that some of the German soldiers were forced to fight, so there heroic actions shouldn't be noted at all?
Precisely my point to be honest, and that could applied today with terrorism.See post above.
Yes because that's how the times made his brain. There were three major conflicts in one life time. Once you are in the military your head can be messed with to make what your doing acceptable. They have to make killing seem normal or you are dead.Precisely my point to be honest, and that could applied today with terrorism.
You can't label everyone that fights Western soldiers in the Middle East as 'terrorists' some of them could simply be in the belief that they're defending their home land from western aggressors, because that's what they've been told.
I suppose a example of this would be that we weren't fighting a traditional war in the Middle East, due to the huge emphasis on the 'hearts and minds' approach, rather than 'kill baddies, pew pew pew.
So to bring it back to the original point, now we've got the post 1960's point of view on history (Especially WW2) that all soldiers are not evil, they're simple people doing a simple task, and they might not necessarily support Hitler, is it correct to call a guy who loved war a hero?