- Joined
- Dec 14, 2003
- Messages
- 3,367
Awwwwwwww!!! Cute!!!!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-30194531
Heart-warming one for once
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-30194531
Heart-warming one for once
I bet houses with people that have peanut allergies don't have them
lol I guess you have to be real careful going round people's houses fitting stuff as well then. Never even thought to tell you I smeared my windows with peanutsYep, you wouldn't find it my house, if you did it would be next to my epipens
lol I guess you have to be real careful going round people's houses fitting stuff as well then. Never even thought to tell you I smeared my windows with peanuts
Thats one side of the story, the other side of the story is that he was a scumbag who had been out on the rob and tried to grab the policeman's gun while being arrested and it went off in the struggle.
That's why the guy fell out of the tree. He saw you doing that. LolI never told you I smear every new window we fit with my rancid cock
If they didn't have so many guns then this sort of shit wouldn't happen but the horse is long gone and died in a ditch somewhere.
Er, he tried to get the gun from the cop and it went off TWELVE TIMES he died. Boo hoo.
CNN reports from the transcript said:The medical investigator took no photos
The medical investigator did not take photographs at the scene of Brown's killing because the camera battery had died, the grand jury heard.
The investigator, who goes to the crime scene to collect evidence for the pathologist, also did not take measurements of anything at the scene because they "didn't need to."
Yet you have managed to establish guilt, it is not the job of the court to prove innocence but to prove guilt, if there is not enough evidence either way then how on earth can they find him guilty?
It wasn't a court - they convened a grand jury m8. They deliberated over whether to indict him - and chose not to.
But look at the statistics for grand juries - in 2010 grand juries looked at ~162,000 cases and declined to return an indictment in just eleven - so just one in more than 14,500 cases.
Yet we all knew what the outcome of this would be ahead of time. Cops very rarely get forced into a trial for killing black people - because they're the guys responsible for gathering evidence against themselves.
But "lol - no camera battery - it ran out! (and evidently, therefore, no mobile phone??)" - "no, we didn't need to take measurements". Eleven shots fired - the first two whilst the lad was allegedly leaning into the car (one bullet found in a seat), but then the rest fired separately, at a distance - and his body found 156 feet away from where the shots were fired from, apparently.
Despite this - I'm not presuming guilt. But this definitely should have gone to court. 100%. There is clearly a broken process in America that is designed solely to protect (increasingly militarised) cops from prosecution.
The law is an ass.
Sounds fair enough to me tbh.
weapons grade stupid to take a toy gun
If you read all the witness transcripts it's quite obvious that he definitely didn't hold his hands up and did in fact go for the cop.
Well, you are the sort of person who'll believe their intrinsic guilt on the basis of no trial whatsoever.
So, fair enough, I guess.
Two different cases, dear. The 12yo was waving a toy gun around in a playground and was shot (and later died in hospital) and @megadave was talking about Michael Brown in Ferguson.Only in 'Murica. Tbh a 12yo with a toy gun sounds way more natural than
a 12yo "going for" a police man.
Pretty sure that's what you've just done with the officer in question
Despite this - I'm not presuming guilt. But this definitely should have gone to court. 100%.