Gwadien
Uneducated Northern Cretin
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2006
- Messages
- 19,927
Just saw Dunkirk. Decent enough movie. Very loud. No plot holes at least.
No plot holes in a true story?
wut?
Edit - Oh yeah, you're American, WW2 started in 1939 mate.
Just saw Dunkirk. Decent enough movie. Very loud. No plot holes at least.
Just watched Dunkirk. Beautiful cinematography, fantastic sound and score. But...
I'm not that sure it was actually a particularly good war movie. The narrative device of having the three main action sequences moving in separate timeframes works when it all comes together, but I'm glad I read about it before I saw the film; it was probably as confusing as fuck if you didn't. And while the air combat sequences were great, they were quite jarring in an otherwise "realistic" film, thanks to Tom Hardy running cheat codes of infinite ammunition and invulnerability. His scenes were pure Michael Bay, especially at the end. Overall the film was more arty Thin Red Line than historic A Bridge Too Far, and I tend to prefer the latter
Agree. Went to see it with some work guys. General consensus was that the human POV was done very well.
I did feel they did a lot of explaining via random lines of dialogue that felt quite jarring to me and imo they could have left theout completely.shell-shocked guy
The shell shocked guy is important. The only character whose name I recall was directly affected by that guy, and he's the only one who's remembered at the end of the film. That's because the film is about conveying the general emotions felt during the event - not the event itself, or the people in it.
Trying to watch King Arthur. Wall to wall mockneys. Painful stuff.
Just watched The Nice Guys, what a great film really enjoyed it.
Just watched The Nice Guys, what a great film really enjoyed it.
Trying to watch King Arthur. Wall to wall mockneys. Painful stuff.