Actually he wasn't sent to prison for "writing something on the internets." He was sent to prison for "inciting racial hatred." It's a crime, whether you think it to be or not.
Surely those penalty statistics are rather meaningless without including valid penalty appeals?
Actually he wasn't sent to prison for "writing something on the internets." He was sent to prison for "inciting racial hatred." It's a crime, whether you think it to be or not.
It's a brand new crime that curbs freedom of speech and landed a guy who wrote something on the internet a longer prison sentence than the guy who caved my mates cheekbone in by kicking him in the face as he got off a train, then kicking him in the face again as he was unconscious on the floor - all unprovoked - requiring him to have a metal plate in his face.
This scarred him for life, physically and mentally. But obviously writing racist remarks on twitter is worse than an actual crime.
I don't give a fuck if it's now on the statute books. A lot of utter chod is on the statute books. We only got rid of the blasphemy laws 30 years ago. It's a fucking disgrace.
I had a 'meeting' this morning with Craig Bellamys agent.
Summary: Commoli is a twat
His agent had Bellamy dragged out of an MRI Scan half way through to broker his move to Spurs at 7:30pm on deadline day because Commoli was f**king him around with wages and stuff before Dalglish shit himself and made Commoli go and grovel which ended up with Bellamy getting a lot more £££ than he should have.
Steve Bruce has said all along that Henderson would never make the step up needed to make it at liverpool
all the players call Carroll 'The Cone' because if you want him over there, you have to pick him up and move him yourself.
That's retarded IMO chod.
People say things they don't mean all the time - you admitted as much there. Making things like that into a crime is disgraceful.
Last thing I'm saying on this matter in this thread. It's about footie after all.
You're advocating thought-crime. But hey ho...
If those checks are not inplace then you end up with a society that is little more than a real life version of 4chan where everyone talks shit all day and doesn't give a fuck if anyone is affected by the comments.
What a load of bollocks. Society dealt with and would have continued to deal with Liam Stacey perfectly well without needing to resort to the law. You don't solve problems like racism by censoring what people say or think, you do it through educating individuals and society.
So we have a 4chan free for all instead? Back to the 70's were they are all darkies and we don't allow, them, the irish or dogs into pubs? Come on, a line had to be drawn and it was, now just like any other law people are going to have to live within it. It isn't a perfect law by any measure but it is better than the alternative where people can say what they like and enflame situations beyond all reason.
So you think the reason that people don't act in a manner befitting 4chan in normal everyday life is simply down to it being against the law? And that if we didn't have those laws people could act in that fashion with no societal repercussions?
It's Facism.
I it's not a fashionable word and leaves you open to ridicule. But it's the dicionary definition of it.
One more time. Facism.
After their team failed to score in 5 games, FC Magdeburg fans show their players where the goal is:
Don't ignore the last part.
What do you propose happens to people spouting racism on twitter etc then?