'Self-entitled' is Liverpool FC through and through.
Liverpool fans still think they support a 'big club'.
Southampton spent £8million on players thid year, an absolutely huge amount for championship... Or 2 fifths of 1 Jordan Henderson who wouldnt even be our best player.
Yep, in terms of monetary power LFC has way more than 90% of the rest of the league - but compared to Chelski or City we're paupers
And i said that the money you have spent shows that you are NOT that far behind Chelsea and City in terms of disposable income for players
I ignored it because it's an obviously shite argument
If I'm worth 100 million, and I spend 50 million of it on hookers and coke I've got 50 million quid left to spend.
If I'm worth 1000 million and I spend 50 million of it on hookers and coke I've got 950 million quid left to spend.
That's roughly the same proportion of money in the Liverpool vs Chelski battle - if we ignore the fact that Liverpool's owner has another team he has to split his cash with and would probably like to keep most of the remainder in the bank...
Just because RA has £13.4b doesn't mean it's all available for player purchases at Chelsea though does it?
edit - also, £1b x 100 is £100b, not £13.4b
Interesting. A long way behind City then, but not far behind Chelsea.
disingenuous article said:NET Spends:
Chelski: £155,900,000, or £31m/season
Liverpool: £83,310,000, or £16m/season
Woops, bad maths, misread it. How many of those 5 seasons has John Henry been in charge?
Same if you take in to account C.Ronaldo then for Man Utdhttp://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/2006-2011.html
Purchased gross Lollerpool are 2nd biggest spenders since 2006, Chelsea 3rd, City 1st. Nett, Chelsea have spent nearly twice as much as Lollerpool.
If you take into account what they scammed Chelsea for over Torres it's different![]()
Yep and he was a brilliant player for Liverpool.Peter Crouch has 1 in 2 for England...