QQ Mereg AoD

Status
Not open for further replies.

Arus Canus

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
342
Kreig said:
Well actually the camp he was doing it on i was actually planing to xp normally on... You know by pressing buttons targeting monsters and stuff, instead there is blantently someone abusing game code....

That is lame.....


So you were planning to "steal" his camp? :p
 

Scunner

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
305
To Be honest i find this a stupid mindless post. You are not a GM and should leave GOA to be judge and Jury based on the facts and evidence they have. As it turns out the GM has stated he didnt break the CoC but you have still damaged his reputation.

Think before you act.

The CoC is never going to be precise just like a contact it is down to interpretation and that is GOA's job not yours. If you suspect something report it but to post this as if he has broken the CoC already is just shameful.
 

Kreig

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
484
Arus Canus said:
So you were planning to "steal" his camp? :p

No i went over with good intentions only to find that it was being abused. I did not REPORT them like i said or record any footage of it, i will next time in future if i see any person doing it to abuse teh game for there own personal self gain.
 

Aremeriel

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
800
Scunner said:
To Be honest i find this a stupid mindless post. You are not a GM and should leave GOA to be judge and Jury based on the facts and evidence they have. As it turns out the GM has stated he didnt break the CoC but you have still damaged his reputation.

I think rather the opposite.. Requiel himself stated in his last post:
Requiel said:
Scenario 3: Animist sets up shroom field, jams down shroom button and goes afk. - Infringement. As he is not there to press the shroom button he is in breach of the CoC.

How is jamming move left button any different from jamming shroom button (for instance 1)???
 

Kreig

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
484
Requiel said:
Scenario 3: Animist sets up shroom field, jams down shroom button and goes afk. - Infringement. As he is not there to press the shroom button he is in breach of the CoC.

Scenario 4: Bonedancer sets pets to aggro, and sets a macro to cast a buff spell every few seconds to avoid going linkdead. - Infringement. As he is not there to press the buff button he is in breach of the CoC.

In situations 3 and 4 though one is a 'hardware hack' by jamming down a button or placing a weight on the keyboard, and one is abuse of a third party program, both are punishable. We will tend to be harder on the third party program user but that doesn't preclude us taking harsher action against the person in scenario 3 if the situation warrants it.

Scunner said:
To Be honest i find this a stupid mindless post. You are not a GM and should leave GOA to be judge and Jury based on the facts and evidence they have. As it turns out the GM has stated he didnt break the CoC but you have still damaged his reputation.

Think before you act.

The CoC is never going to be precise just like a contact it is down to interpretation and that is GOA's job not yours. If you suspect something report it but to post this as if he has broken the CoC already is just shameful.


Yes thats right Scunner Requiel doesnt actually put us straight there now does he, if u read it and what i described it is plainly obvious that Mereg was abusing a hardware hack.

Why bother posting if u dont even bother to read the info.
 

old.windforce

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
3,414
such whine

what if i take a leak and my pet aggros a mob and kill it?

anyway, afk exping != macro crafting and should be allowed / not prosicuted since it is allowed to go afk, and if your pet happens to be on aggresive you get some crappy exp
 

Garok

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
777
Still dont see what the big deal is ..

Its not as if anyone's enjoyment of the game was being spoilt by this as it would do if it was say useing Speed hacks Radar or Mob/Artifact stealing?

It was most likley put in to stop 3rd partys afk lvling charecters and then selling the accounts for £100+.

So why make the dig deal about it by makeing a long personalised post? Seems to me like you have issues with AOD for what ever reason be they valid or invalid which has brough about this.

If you realy find this an issue DON'T personalise it .. take one look @ the personal attack on Martok to see that all it does is loose you all credability.

Wording it as "my friend was caught afk lvling etc .... and action was taken against his account etc ... just to warn you etc..." would get your point accross with out gaining xx flames...
 

Miff

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jun 21, 2004
Messages
109
Garok said:
Still dont see what the big deal is ..

Its not as if anyone's enjoyment of the game was being spoilt by this as it would do if it was say useing Speed hacks Radar or Mob/Artifact stealing?

It was most likley put in to stop 3rd partys afk lvling charecters and then selling the accounts for £100+.

So why make the dig deal about it by makeing a long personalised post? Seems to me like you have issues with AOD for what ever reason be they valid or invalid which has brough about this.

If you realy find this an issue DON'T personalise it .. take one look @ the personal attack on Martok to see that all it does is loose you all credability.

Wording it as "my friend was caught afk lvling etc .... and action was taken against his account etc ... just to warn you etc..." would get your point accross with out gaining xx flames...

He cheated and should be punished accordingly, much like the same way Juj was punished However i think Juj was to harschly punished, but still it´s the fact you don´t give different punishments on similiar cases. Either free both or punish both , thats the only options I can see viable. And that is what this thread is about , atleast for me.
 

NeonBlue

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Messages
924
Miff said:
He cheated and should be punished accordingly, much like the same way Juj was punished However i think Juj was to harschly punished, but still it´s the fact you don´t give different punishments on similiar cases. Either free both or punish both , thats the only options I can see viable. And that is what this thread is about , atleast for me.

agree 100%...and thats all this thread is about...nothing else!
 

Garok

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
777
NeonBlue said:
agree 100%...and thats all this thread is about...nothing else!

But why personalise it ? Got a problem go to GoA let them sort it.

I could make a whine post about anyone with over 1 LGM crafter saying they must have used crafting macro, which would most likely be true in 60% of the cases.

To get so worked up about an act that was not ment maliciously seems completely idiotic to take it this far.

AND that is the bottom line
 

Wennberg

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
29
Aremeriel said:
I think rather the opposite.. Requiel himself stated in his last post:


How is jamming move left button any different from jamming shroom button (for instance 1)???

Exactly
 

NeonBlue

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Messages
924
Garok said:
But why personalise it ? Got a problem go to GoA let them sort it.

I could make a whine post about anyone with over 1 LGM crafter saying they must have used crafting macro, which would most likely be true in 60% of the cases.

To get so worked up about an act that was not ment maliciously seems completely idiotic to take it this far.

AND that is the bottom line

speaking for me...i aint personalising it...its nothing to do with the player or guild in question...its to do with the ACT

Garok said:
To get so worked up about an act that was not ment maliciously seems completely idiotic to take it this far

aslong as its not malicious its ok to cheat in ur book?

whether it was done maliciously or not...its still cheating

Also what myself and others are trying to get across here is...that if the rules apply to 1 person...then they gotta apply to them all

Yes theres different degrees of cheating...and some ppl may do it unknowingly (sp?)...but when ur involving 3rd party software or some means to fool the game that ur at the keyboard when ur not so u can XP ...then they deserve the same punishment in my book.
 

Simba

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Mar 30, 2004
Messages
207
Muhaha :D
Kreig you looser !!! :)

Could you plz post your alts name too?
It will be usefull when anyone see you lfg anywhere,
We will known whom to not invite in any circumstances :D
 

NeonBlue

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Messages
924
Simba said:
Muhaha :D
Kreig you looser !!! :)

Could you plz post your alts name too?
It will be usefull when anyone see you lfg anywhere,
We will known whom to not invite in any circumstances :D

aye god forbid u should want anyone in ur group who plays the game correctly !!


grow up !
 

Scunner

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
305
Kreig said:
Yes thats right Scunner Requiel doesnt actually put us straight there now does he, if u read it and what i described it is plainly obvious that Mereg was abusing a hardware hack.

Why bother posting if u dont even bother to read the info.

If requiel Thinks he has been breaking the CoC he would/will act on it. Point still stands tbh.
 

Cirandi

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Jun 9, 2004
Messages
512
Simba said:
Muhaha :D
Kreig you looser !!! :)

Could you plz post your alts name too?
It will be usefull when anyone see you lfg anywhere,
We will known whom to not invite in any circumstances :D

:eek7:

Who are you calling a loser really? You've basically been proved wrong on all your posts in this thread
 

NeonBlue

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Messages
924
Cirandi said:
:eek7:

Who are you calling a loser really? You've basically been proved wrong on all your posts in this thread

Wings = is or was member of AOD...so yet another typical response :p
 

Ginius

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 12, 2004
Messages
223
Scunner said:
To Be honest i find this a stupid mindless post. You are not a GM and should leave GOA to be judge and Jury based on the facts and evidence they have.

Best sentences I found in this thread. :cheers:
 

Uberlama

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
566
NeonBlue said:
Wings = is or was member of AOD...so yet another typical response :p

so again what is your problem with AOD ? you denied it but we can easily see that your problem is with our guild not with one person.
 

Uberlama

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
566
Uberlama said:
so again what is your problem with AOD ? you denied it but we can easily see that your problem is with our guild not with one person.


hm, you know what ? I dont care, pls dont reply, wont read this thread more as its useless now.
 

NeonBlue

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Messages
924
Uberlama said:
so again what is your problem with AOD ? you denied it but we can easily see that your problem is with our guild not with one person.

i ve no problem with AOD or anyone else

except the fact they behave like children...and ppl like Wings/Simba prove this

but if thats what u wanna think go ahead
 

Ginius

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 12, 2004
Messages
223
NeonBlue said:
i ve no problem with AOD or anyone else

except the fact they behave like children...and ppl like Wings/Simba prove this

but if thats what u wanna think go ahead

NeonBlue said:
member of AOD...so yet another typical response :p

Sounds for me like you have a problem with the guild, not with the member that postet here.
[sarcasm]And yes, I'm in the GOP-ally, that's why I interact for AOD here... :worthy: [/sarcasm]
 

NeonBlue

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Messages
924
Ginius said:
Sounds for me like you have a problem with the guild, not with the member that postet here.
[sarcasm]And yes, I'm in the GOP-ally, that's why I interact for AOD here... :worthy: [/sarcasm]


After playing the game for so long and reading these boards for nearly as long...u get to know how certain ppl will respond to certain threads

so when i say or reply to a thread with that was a "typical response" it means, thats what i would expect off that person or guild...nothing more ...nothing less!

its called perception...or knowing the ppl around you

bit like if u RvR with the same ppl day in ...day out...u learn how they play..what they will do ...so to a point u dont even have to ask em or tell them what to do in a certain situation
 

NeonBlue

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Messages
924
Ginius said:
That means you have a problem with them?
(Just a question)

nope no problem with them what so ever....

i just have got use to the repsonses they give to certain things...and the majority of the responses are immature...childish...and contain nothing but flames...and they always reply in numbers...its like they cant fight their own battles solo...they always gotta "zerg" a thread....bit like RvR some would say :D

but thats their choice and it doesnt bother me...i can just predict what will happen sometimes
 

NeonBlue

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Messages
924
sigh...my point just proven...this is a PM msg ive just recieved

directonally from your pen:
"tut tut naughty cabby !!

sounds like he might be using that script whats out that allows u afk xping....infact sounds exactly like it

theres no excuse for this ....and from what uve described he wont even realise hes dead until he wakes up in the morning !!

personally i would do everything i could to get the fecker banned!"

personally i would do everything i could to kick u irl...
__________________
Lujo Papa Phoenix Knight mercenary, ml10 Battlemaster
Nevem Senki Eagle Knight icewizard
Arwenke Godspeed Eagle Knight stealthzerger
Lopakodo Halal Gryphon Knight stealthzor
Angelujo Myrmidon spiwit cabby

Proud member of the hungarian maffia, <Angels of Darkness>

ill repeat...i have NO problem with AOD....but seems they want to make it a problem


anyways...enough of this childish crap...cba with it...so zerg my pm box all u like...i couldnt give a toss !
 

Uberlama

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
566
neonblue: I think you are childish if u make public pms, immature, childis, ridiculous, pitiful etc. You are the one who behave like this. Private Messages are to not beeing public if I am right. Did you ask his permission to make this public ? dont think so. And you still wonder why you got flamed ? :)
 

NeonBlue

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Messages
924
Uberlama said:
neonblue: I think you are childish if u make public pms, immature, childis, ridiculous, pitiful etc. You are the one who behave like this. Private Messages are to not beeing public if I am right. Did you ask his permission to make this public ? dont think so. And you still wonder why you got flamed ? :)

i dont need permission to make msgs in MY pm box...public

though sending me numerous PMs with threats etc...is kinda childish wouldnt u think?

as for flamed?....only u flamed me....everyone else...seemed to agree with what i said to some point

now far as am concerned...topic has been discussed...GOA might taken action...they might not...thats their choice

my say on the matter is done

have a nice day
 

Ilum

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
1,774
Kreig said:
Was out 2nite xping a few alts around DM, when i happened to come across Mereg of AoD (48 Cabalist) afking xping. Spinning on the spot infinitly with Saphire Sim up on Agro killing Neutral con mobs.

Sat there and watched for an hr or so, waiting to see if they did anything what so ever. To which they didnt. First off i thought ok well this is blatant abuse so i thought i'd record it on fraps or something.
Decided not to as this was my first encounter with this, but instead i logged on another char. Ran off and charmed a higher/equal con mob to the Sim, proceeded to buff it up, then i went and followed the Sim with this un-charmed Agro attacking me. Not a problem didnt hurt me to much, eventually the Saphire Sim agroed the fully buffed/eb/absed mob and attacked it.

Saphire Sim died, Mob agroed AFK xping pet owner and subsquently died. Now if this person wasnt afk they surely would have "woken-up" from there afkness and moved/shouted or just done something other than spin on the spot. I even waited at there body till they /auto released.

Yes you got an XP death, serves you right tbh. Next time i catch you afking XPin, or any other person for that mater i will record it and send to RightNow for some kind of hopeful banning/punishment. This sort of abuse shouldnt be tolorated by the community, it may seem harsh but its lame for all the "normal" ppl who have to xp genuinely.

I hope AoD doesnt condone these kinds of activities.


/rant off


P.S. Couldnt give a flying fuck from all the QQer's who may or not flame, never can tell as there logic (lack of) preceeds them.

Imo you have too much spare time if you waste time on this..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom