Not sure the IP thing is as simple as the EADS now owns the 20%. Some of the Ip was original BAe design IP from previous work projects before Airbus EADS was created. Factory is on BAe land - Filton and they own all the tooling and jigs to build. At least that is what I was told recently by a sales guy for Airbus. It was part of their investment into the EADS Partnership 2012 or around then.
Read the 24M money set aside for trade deal thing on the Sky News (UK) ticker news feed a, bottom of screen 2 days ago. Thought it was odd and can't find anything online about it though which is odd.
So the silly cow has been saying since announcing her deal that it was the best the UK was going to get and it couldn't be improved. And now she suddenly thinks she can go back and improve it, wasting yet more time, despite the EU saying at every opportunity that it wasn't open to renegotiation.
It doesn't sound like there's much wiggle room there, does it?
We're getting into "we tried, this is all the EU's fault" narrative build up here. Their own little parochial bubble designed to protect the Tories with no fucking care for what happens to the country. Self-serving scum the lot of them.
Ye boi, we've now agreed that the Irish Backstop needs to be removed, great!, that's means we're sorted!
EU 'united' on Brexit deal, says Barnier
Oh yeah, we're not the most important political entity in this.
Yeah but this works treats for Brexiteers, even Tusk has been painted as a bogey man when he's clearly the nicest politician around.
They just repeat the narrative of all the countries in the EU but it'll still be a case of it's the political elites in Brussels controlling it all.
I know. Unfortunately blaming the EU doesn't stop the country burning down.
Yet last week:
https://order-order.com/2019/01/24/eu-cornered-backstop-sham-starts-unravel/
That sounds awfully like the "Technical Solution" Davis proposed two years ago and was told it wouldn't work.
Nice source
I'll assume that means you don't have any issues with the content then, if attacking the source is all you have?
I'll assume that means you don't have any issues with the content then, if attacking the source is all you have?
I just copied and pasted that 'quote' from Barnier, there's nothing out there, everything I did find was literally copied and pasted from that same article.
The only things that I could find was Barnier talking about how we could try to cooperate more and there would be no choice but to have checks at the border for HGVs etc.
I'm always dubious of a news site which looks like something I made at school.
Tl;dr but I saw lots of out of sequence snippets to create a narrative, which the fuckwits in the comments section echo chamber lapped up.