Politics POLL: Brexit Withdrawal Agreement

If you were an MP would you vote for or against it?

  • FOR

  • AGAINST


Results are only viewable after voting.

caLLous

I am a FH squatter
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
18,435
Cameron saying "for heaven's sake man, go" feels like decades ago.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,074
Why won’t he fuck off?
Because he has a popular mandate from a record half a million members.

The PLP should represent the views of those members, but it doesn't. The reason Corbyn and Labour are so weak is that the PLP is made up of tory-lite MPs who've spent all their efforts trying to oust Corbyn since he was elected rather than spending their efforts doing what their job is - to represent members views.
 

Wij

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
18,220
Because he has a popular mandate from a record half a million members.

The PLP should represent the views of those members, but it doesn't. The reason Corbyn and Labour are so weak is that the PLP is made up of tory-lite MPs who've spent all their efforts trying to oust Corbyn since he was elected rather than spending their efforts doing what their job is - to represent members views.
Entryists. I know many lifelong members of Labour, not to mention councillors and such who can't stand him. He should have been forced out to the SWP decades ago.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,842
Entryists. I know many lifelong members of Labour, not to mention councillors and such who can't stand him. He should have been forced out to the SWP decades ago.

Corbyn IS what the Labour party should be though.

People have recognised that politics has stagnated, we have two political parties who agree with each other on everything, it's boring, the only thing that is debated is immigration.

I'd much rather see a more right wing Tories and a more left wing Labour and get rid of UKIP so we don't have to have the extremities in mainstream politics anymore.

Put it this way, I'd much rather see a Corbyn/Sanders revolution in politics than a Trump/Farage revolution, simply because I genuinely believe that Corbyn/Sanders have the people at the forefront of their image and genuinely want to change their countries to suit the populace better, at the detriment to the rich (hence why this very middle class forum is very hostile to him.) Whereas Trump just wants a better life for the rich whilst lying to the poor.

As for Corbyn himself, I'm not sure what the fucks going on where he can pose a decent opposition, you would have thought he would thrive in gaining mass support against the Tories, and historically has been in his character, but I suspect something is going on in the background where he's being held back or something.
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,287
Because he has a popular mandate from a record half a million members.

The PLP should represent the views of those members, but it doesn't. The reason Corbyn and Labour are so weak is that the PLP is made up of tory-lite MPs who've spent all their efforts trying to oust Corbyn since he was elected rather than spending their efforts doing what their job is - to represent members views.

The PLP should represent their voters, and given that the Tory-lite Labour had 3 terms in office, and NewOld Labour couldn't get into power against one of the most incompetent PM's in living memory, I'd say the voters have spoken on that one.

It's actually getting to a point where even a grizzled old Libertarian like me could consider voting for New Labour, as the current shower aren't any less annoying - but Corbyn's Labour?

Not a fucking chance.
 

Wij

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
18,220
Corbyn IS what the Labour party should be though.

People have recognised that politics has stagnated, we have two political parties who agree with each other on everything, it's boring, the only thing that is debated is immigration.

I'd much rather see a more right wing Tories and a more left wing Labour and get rid of UKIP so we don't have to have the extremities in mainstream politics anymore.

Put it this way, I'd much rather see a Corbyn/Sanders revolution in politics than a Trump/Farage revolution, simply because I genuinely believe that Corbyn/Sanders have the people at the forefront of their image and genuinely want to change their countries to suit the populace better, at the detriment to the rich (hence why this very middle class forum is very hostile to him.) Whereas Trump just wants a better life for the rich whilst lying to the poor.

As for Corbyn himself, I'm not sure what the fucks going on where he can pose a decent opposition, you would have thought he would thrive in gaining mass support against the Tories, and historically has been in his character, but I suspect something is going on in the background where he's being held back or something.
Bollocks. Corbyn is not where any party should be. He has no interest in British politics really, only protesting that it must be wrong. He's made his life's mission to say that everything everyone else does in the West is wrong and voted against his whip accordingly, on everything. He has never had a realistic answer to anything and is being shown up now as leader of the opposition as fundamentally lazy in that regard.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,842
Bollocks. Corbyn is not where any party should be. He has no interest in British politics really, only protesting that it must be wrong. He's made his life's mission to say that everything everyone else does in the West is wrong and voted against his whip accordingly, on everything. He has never had a realistic answer to anything and is being shown up now as leader of the opposition as fundamentally lazy in that regard.

I don't know, he shares the opinion of many people, hence why he is leader of the Labour party.

People don't like the UK's stance towards Israel, Saudi Arabia and other aspects, I don't think he's the right person for the job, but his politics aren't wrong, just because they're a threat to your wallet. ;)
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,074
Entryists.
If that's the case it's easily remedied by anyone interested enough in how the labour party is goverened eh?

Just join and vote. Democracy in action. Easy to get rid of him.

Rest of country must either love him, or not be arsed enough to get rid.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,842
I also like the way he gets criticised for his stance on talking to terrorist groups; he was talking to the ANC and the IRA WAY before it was cool to do so, a bit like Hamas or central figures in Hamas will be central to a peaceful solution in Israel/Palestine.

Whilst I understand there's a degree of incompetence from him, I do feel like there has been a massive amount of character assassination by the Media, you know, the companies that are owned by people that will be targeted by a Corbynite Government.
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,411
I also like the way he gets criticised for his stance on talking to terrorist groups; he was talking to the ANC and the IRA WAY before it was cool to do so, a bit like Hamas or central figures in Hamas will be central to a peaceful solution in Israel/Palestine.

Whilst I understand there's a degree of incompetence from him, I do feel like there has been a massive amount of character assassination by the Media, you know, the companies that are owned by people that will be targeted by a Corbynite Government.

If he can’t lead, his political views aren’t worth shit, and he emphatically can’t lead. The Tories should have been torn to pieces over the last two years, fish in a barrel stuff, and he’s sat there doing absolutely fuck all.
 

dysfunction

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,709
I'm wondering how long you believe that the EU will change their stance.

If you can't accept that then there really is no hope for you.
 

Wij

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
18,220
Yesterday probably wasn't the best day to launch this, but this looks intriguing:

https://capx.co/a-better-deal-an-alternative-to-the-irish-backstop/
I may be missing something but it’s not an alternative to the backstop as far as I can see. If the EU were already convinced this would work it would be the deal. If they can be convinced in the transition period then it would mean that the backstop doesn’t need to be invoked but the backstop still needs to be in there now because they haven’t yet agreed that this proposal is feasible.

A note of caution though. I think that relying on the fact that we have equivalent regulation on goods at the point of exit is not going to fly. If we can then diverge later then Ireland would be in the situation I outlined a few posts back. This will be the EU’s position whether you like it or not.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
I'm wondering how long you believe that the EU will change their stance.

If you can't accept that then there really is no hope for you.
Well theyre not going to if the main negotiator accepts they wont before she even leaves the fucking house.
She is broken.
 

Wij

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
18,220
Well theyre not going to if the main negotiator accepts they wont before she even leaves the fucking house.
She is broken.
All the key players on the EU side said they ain’t budging. Maybe accepting reality is better then pig-headed inability to face facts sometimes.

New Brexit secretary appointed:


View: https://youtu.be/hcsfrOGOP6o
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Maybe if the fucking press in this country would stop using words like 'begging', its just unbelievable...they really are anti british
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,411
Yesterday probably wasn't the best day to launch this, but this looks intriguing:

https://capx.co/a-better-deal-an-alternative-to-the-irish-backstop/

  • a Customs and Trade Facilitation Chapter with an Irish border protocol: an agreement to deploy advanced customs and trade facilitation measures, including specific solutions for the Irish border.
This is "technical solutions" by another name. What does it actually mean in practical terms?

  • regulatory recognition based on deemed equivalence because we will be identical on day one of Brexit: on sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) and animal health measures and mutual recognition of conformity assessment, with measures to ensure that the animal health and disease control zone on the island of Ireland can be maintained.
This only has value if the equivalence is maintained, which, unless I'm missing something, isn't mentioned. This is literally the point of the backstop in the first place.

  • Third, the removal of Geographic Indications provisions (GIs). These are more appropriate for a trade negotiation and are a controversial aspect of trade policy for the UK’s other trading partners.
First of all, what other trading partners? Right this minute the UK doesn't have any except via the EU, so potential trading partners would be the correct expression, and oh yes, they are indeed "controversial" for other trading partners because they protect local IP rights and local product categories. I'm sure the Chinese would love a handy gateway at Newry to import knock-off tat. Alibaba could build a Distribution Centre right on the border.

Its a "better deal" alright, but not for the EU. It will be rejected out of hand.
 

Talivar

Part of the furniture
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
2,057
One of the biggest problems at the moment is the cuts to Police and Childrens Services have helped to allow a very rapid and massive rise in CCE (Child Criminal Explotation) and the organised crime gangs and their new style of working the County Lines system. People seem oblivious to how big and dangerous this is.
 

Embattle

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
13,219
Text of EU summit conclusions on Brexit

UK withdrawal deal 'not open for renegotiation'

1. The European Council reconfirms its conclusions of 25 November 2018, in which it endorsed the Withdrawal Agreement and approved the Political Declaration. The Union stands by this agreement and intends to proceed with its ratification. It is not open for renegotiation.

2. The European Council reiterates that it wishes to establish as close as possible a partnership with the United Kingdom in the future. It stands ready to embark on preparations immediately after signature of the Withdrawal Agreement to ensure that negotiations can start as soon as possible after the UK’s withdrawal.

3. The European Council underlines that the backstop is intended as an insurance policy to prevent a hard border on the island of Ireland and ensure the integrity of the Single Market. It is the Union’s firm determination to work speedily on a subsequent agreement that establishes by 31 December 2020 alternative arrangements, so that the backstop will not need to be triggered.

4. The European Council also underlines that, if the backstop were nevertheless to be triggered, it would apply temporarily, unless and until it is superseded by a subsequent agreement that ensures that a hard border is avoided. In such a case, the Union would use its best endeavours to negotiate and conclude expeditiously a subsequent agreement that would replace the backstop, and would expect the same of the United Kingdom, so that the backstop would only be in place for as long as strictly necessary.

5. The European Council calls for work on preparedness at all levels for the consequences of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal to be intensified, taking into account all possible outcomes.
 

Ormorof

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,830
The UKs negotiating tactic of "our government is a shambles who cant do anything so you have to give us what we demand" does not appear to be working
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom