Politics POLL: Brexit Withdrawal Agreement

If you were an MP would you vote for or against it?

  • FOR

  • AGAINST


Results are only viewable after voting.

Raven

Happy Shopper Ray Mears
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,644
So, 6 months then.

We can't produce lamb for 12 months of the year, which is why for ~6 months of the year, the lamb you buy now is NZ lamb, only now it will be easier to import.

* and no, this deal means pretty much nothing because we already import it. But the argument against it is laughable. Straws are being desperately clutched.
 

Raven

Happy Shopper Ray Mears
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,644
"lamb" is, lamb isn't...and I know a lot of sheep farmers.

There is a reason it's called lamb, it's because lambs are slaughtered and not sheep. Sheep breed based on season, they do not produce lamb in the summer/autumn, it just doesn't happen. Lamb are born in March/April sort of time.

Yes, cold, hard reality for townies, Lamb is adolescent sheep, you're eating puppies/kittens, essentially.
 
Last edited:

Aoami

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
11,223
Last edited:

Raven

Happy Shopper Ray Mears
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,644
OK, I live half a mile from 3 of them, they drink in the same pub (if we are comparing celebs) You can fuck about with it a bit but for the most part it's more effort than it's worth.

UK lambing seasons is March/April (and maybe Feb) it just is what it is.

Feeding them is the hardest part, and you aren't going to have the foodstock to feed lambs during the winter.
 

Aoami

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
11,223
Dont know why im arguing this because i literally dont give a fuck, but a quick look at all the main supermarkets (minus tesco, website is down) says they sell british lamb all year round




 

Raven

Happy Shopper Ray Mears
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,644
It's not fresh. Frozen is not fresh.

You can argue about it all you like, but fresh lamb has a very short shelf life, from source to table, that's science, unfortunately.
 

Aoami

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
11,223
All of the articles say fresh lamb so you'd better get on the blower to trading standards

edit - except sainos

also, i doubt you can freeze meat, thaw it out and sell it as fresh, that sounds dodgy as fuck?
 

Raven

Happy Shopper Ray Mears
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,644
Imagine if UK supermarkets were elaborate with the truth.
 

Aoami

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
11,223

" While tradition sees the country eating more lamb at Easter, Britain typically produces the highest volume of lamb during the last six months of the year, with a peak of supply from September through to December. "

:badumtish:
 

Raven

Happy Shopper Ray Mears
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,644
No, I said we don't produce lamb, as in they aren't born. NZ have the same "issue" but in reverse.

Seems like a perfectly reasonable deal if you are really into eating lamb...

Edit, mutton is fine if you aren't a snob, it just needs slow cooking a bit longer.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,058
Considering I live on a Welsh hill farm that specialised in lamb, am surrounded by Welsh hill farmers who very much do lamb - and they do it to the highest quality - and New Zealand lamb, the son of the previous owner of this place has gone there because he was too shit to make it work for him here.
It's not fresh. Frozen is not fresh.
So, do you think they don't freeze New Zealand lamb to bring it over here?

All it is is a race to the bottom in environmental and animal husbandry standards. It's a fucking disgrace.

Oh, btw:
Sheep breed based on season, they do not produce lamb in the summer/autumn, it just doesn't happen. Lamb are born in March/April sort of time.
Lambing round here starts in February. If they want to push a second lambing season out they can do, but generally choose not to - because it's hard on the sheep.

New Zealand lamb though? Fuck yeah. On Steroids.

Literally.


Edit: And we'll ignore the fact that it's from the other side of the world...
 

Raven

Happy Shopper Ray Mears
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,644
That's all very interesting but it doesn't separate from the fact that if you want fresh UK lamb then it is born from Feb (early) to April and if you want lamb in December then it is either previously frozen or imported. It makes fuck all difference whether we are in the EU or not, being in the EU does not change the planet's spin, regardless of what EU nutters believe.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,058
That's all very interesting but it doesn't separate from the fact that if you want fresh UK lamb then it is born from Feb (early) to April and if you want lamb in December then it is either previously frozen or imported.

So why not buy frozen British lamb then? Instead of importing frozen New Zealand lamb from the other side of the world, grown to lower animal husbandry standards?

Edit: Feb isn't that early btw. Some pop theirs at Christmas.
 

Raven

Happy Shopper Ray Mears
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,644
That's not the argument...

I have no problem with previously frozen lamb...but it isn't fresh, regardless of the marketing behind it.
 
Last edited:

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,058
Please to be defining this "fresh" thing Mr @Raven :)

On the face of it - "fresh" sounds like a quality and time argument. New Zealand lamb takes a bit under two months (frozen) to get to the UK, then it needs to be turned around for the supermarkets. How "fresh" is that?

We export (mainly to the discerning palletes in Europe) more lamb than we import. The reason we eat NZ lamb is price. But the price of NZ lamb is no different in Europe, yet they still choose British.

Ask yourself - why is that?


Quality is on the side of the UK. And the way we manage our flocks - in terms of antibiotic use and animal welfare (for example, NZ farmers can still dock the tails of their lambs, without any anasthetic, up to six months of age) is also superior.

Environmentally, we produce enough lamb for the UK market. We should be sourcing it here.

For me - your "freshness" argument needs to be amazingly compelling to override animal cruelty/other husbandry arrangements, environmental, antibiotic and all other considerations (including putting UK farmers under even more pressure).

The only thing making NZ look good is that at least we've not got a US deal yet because they pump their shit way full of growth hormones. :eek:
 

Raven

Happy Shopper Ray Mears
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,644
You seem to have a habit of arguing with people that are stating how things are, as if it is their opinion.
I don't support importing NZ lamb, I have simply stated the valid reasons why it is imported at certain times of the year. Frankly, I don't see why people can't just go without for 6 months of the year, it's supposed to be seasonal meat.
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,409
Lots of stupid people don't understand how seasons work, it's fine.

It's almost as if they believe lambs are born all year round or at exactly the same time all over the globe.

The UK's own analysis shows no benefit and a possible loss, from the NZ deal.
 

Raven

Happy Shopper Ray Mears
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,644
...and that's the nature of a free trade deal, otherwise it wouldn't be a free trade deal, would it?

Edit, there are other benefits of a free trade deal, financial services, other trade.

Along with the other benefits of not being in the EU, such as not having our constitution (if we had one) overridden, looking at you, Poland.
 
Last edited:

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,409
...and that's the nature of a free trade deal, otherwise it wouldn't be a free trade deal, would it?

What? No, its supposed to grow trade and an ideal trade deal mutually grows GDP. Otherwise what's the point?

This trade deal (and indeed every UK deal so far), is not about trade, its just political theatre to show the Tories are "getting Brexit done".
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,058
Yeah. If you do a "free trade deal" that doesn't benefit you financially then actually you're "being a fucking idiot".
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,842
The 'benefit' was that the UK gets more access to the NZ jobs market - Boris.

I'm not sure of that means people moving to NZ (which isn't a benefit if we're losing professionals) or it means that jobs will be contracted out to the UK, but I don't see how that works either, because you know... opposite side of the planet and all that.
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,409
The 'benefit' was that the UK gets more access to the NZ jobs market - Boris.

I'm not sure of that means people moving to NZ (which isn't a benefit if we're losing professionals) or it means that jobs will be contracted out to the UK, but I don't see how that works either, because you know... opposite side of the planet and all that.

There he goes again. There's nothing in the FTA about Labour mobility. There might be something in the future:

NZ Gov said:
In a statement, Ardern announced New Zealand and the UK have committed to a "mobility dialogue" outside of the FTA that will consider how people-to-people links can be deepened even further

Then when you look at this "mobility dialogue" all it is is talks to extend the holiday work visa thing that already exists. So two-tenths of fuck all, not even agreed and Boris is selling it like Free Movement of Labour.
 

Aoami

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
11,223

"David Anderson, another Vodafone customer, is equally unhappy with the changes. He feels it's part of a wider pattern of additional charges and bureaucracy making it harder for Brits to travel abroad.

"This isn't what Brexit is meant to be," he tells Euronews Travel, "I voted leave to make things simpler, to stop having to follow rules made up by someone I didn't vote for. This is worse than it was before."

Formerly a landlord, David sold his tenanted properties in the UK shortly after the Brexit vote. He planned to move to Portugal permanently when he retired in 2018, but didn't manage to sort residency.

Instead, David has been living partly in the Algarve and partly in Essex in the UK. He says he relies on free data roaming when he's abroad.

"This stupid roaming stuff is just another way we are getting shafted. I don't understand how these companies can be allowed to lie to us like this. It's unacceptable," he adds."

kek
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,058
Education.

Whilst Brexiteers rightly said "stop calling us thick" - it really was in many cases calling a spade a spade.

It was obvious. But there were enough poorly educated people who simply can't grasp the obvious. The correct solution is to give them the tools to be able to spot bullshit.
 

caLLous

I am a FH squatter
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
18,432

Britain accepts EU judges’ role in Northern Ireland protocol

Britain has formally dropped its demand that Europe’s highest court should have no legal role in the controversial Northern Ireland protocol.

In a key concession to Brussels Lord Frost, the Brexit minister, will tell his EU counterpart today that Britain now accepts that the European Court of Justice (ECJ) must be allowed to interpret the protocol of the Brexit agreement.

The move represents a significant shift from the British side in an attempt to unblock negotiations on changes to the protocol, designed to prevent a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, which have been going on since October.

Frost will also tell Maros Sefcovic, vice-president of the European Commission, that Britain is prepared to accept a “staged” process, with separate deals on different aspects of the protocol rather than addressing it all at once.

Today the EU will publish its legislation to ensure that all medicines that are available in Britain can also be prescribed in Northern Ireland. The UK said it had not seen the final details of the proposals but believed they would be broadly acceptable.

The British moves suggest that Frost has backed away from threats to end the talks and trigger Article 16 — unilaterally walking away from aspects of the protocol. The government had set a deadline of this month for agreement, but officials now concede that talks will run well into the new year.

EU diplomats have welcomed the concessions as “realism” and see the court question as abandoned until later next year or beyond when the EU will be open to more substantial negotiations on the protocol. “It is about time that the UK got real,” said an EU diplomat. “The negotiations can now focus on the real issues for people in Northern Ireland . . . such as medicines.”

The government had denied last Friday that its ECJ demands had been dropped. At the time a spokesman said such claims were an “inaccurate characterisation of our position”. He said: “Any durable solution must address the full range of difficulties created by the protocol, including on the European Court of Justice.” Under the plans now being proposed by the UK, side disputes would go to an independent arbitration panel, with the ECJ asked to interpret matters of EU law.

Under the present agreement the commission rules on disputes and if the UK does not comply it refers the case directly to the court as an infringement.

The EU offered a similar model to Switzerland during talks last year on a “framework treaty”, which aimed to bring together 120 bilateral agreements between the parties. Under the model, the arbitration panel would have included EU and Swiss judges who would have discussed disputes before points of EU law were referred to the ECJ for “a preliminary ruling”. The panel then applies that to the case in hand.

If applied to the Northern Ireland protocol, issues such as food safety controls would be covered by arbitration instead of being immediately escalated to the ECJ as an infringement.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom