Bodhi
Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 9,346
Commenting on stuff you don't understand again eh?
Commenting on stuff you don't understand again eh?
Unless your post is sarcastic then I think we are in contradiction, just not officially...
of course it will if they impose heavy duties and import license costs, agreed of the absorbing costs thoughNo-one's going to "lose 67 billion euros", that's a silly argument. Trade isn't going to stop, it's just going to become more expensive and difficult to administer, and the question is "who can absorb more damage?" And the answer to that is obviously the EU.
Same time every year like clockwork.Former leader Nigel Farage quits UKIP
Don’t really buy his excuse.
In unrelated news Farage has been seen meeting with Boris and co recently.
of course it will if they impose heavy duties and import license costs, agreed of the absorbing costs though
Lets face it, if the EU continue to play silly buggers over every issue that is the more likely outcome. UK Parliament is not (or highly unlikely imo) going to accept the deal as is. It was not what the referendum was about, Keeping the EU legal system etc. It is the exact opposite outcome of what was asked of the electorate. This whole saga has been a bullying exercise by Brussels. Maybe we would be better off in the long run standing up to that and trade with other partners. Monetarily it would be the EU's loss.
Just to be clear I did not vote leave and thought it was a shit idea due to knowing full well that we would end up in this exact situation. Shit untenable deal, completely one sided in the EU's favour.
Can you show examples of the EU playing silly buggers, its an argument i am seeing a lot but honestly cant see it. From where im standing the EU has been clear on all the main issues from the beginning with the UK hopping from one stance to another
Then asking them again won’t be a problem will itLOL, of course they did. Remain out spent Leave by a mile and were also economic with the truth (unless I missed WW3 and the Punishment Budget - Cameron also said they'd implement what we decided, the biggest lie of all).
The words may and estimate are also doing pretty heavy lifting in that article.
The people knew what they were voting for, get on with implementing the result.
Then asking them again won’t be a problem will it
You mean asking them again until you get the right answer? After calling them racist idiots for 3 years?
No can't see a problem there at all.
My point was that if the people knew what they were voting for then a second referendum would produce exactly the same result. If May’s deal or no deal is what they knew they were voting for then you must be confident it would then.You mean asking them again until you get the right answer? After calling them racist idiots for 3 years?
No can't see a problem there at all.
Mmmkay.If it was a different question, such as "Do you want May's Deal or No Deal" then sure, let's do it.
Putting answers on a 2nd vote that lost the first time just reeks of trying to get the "right" answer.