- Joined
- Dec 26, 2003
- Messages
- 9,353
- Thread starter
- #91
Stories shouldn't adapt to modern days just to appease modern people.
If that were true then Black Pete wouldnt exist since hes a relatively modern addition - glad to see you agree
Stories shouldn't adapt to modern days just to appease modern people.
WHO THE HELL ARE MUSLIMS TO TELL PEOPLE CHRISTMAS IS WRONG.
Relativity doesn't equal agreement, that's a whole different topic on origins and the basis of the celebration.
What is the time frame of this "modern" addition? 1996?
rynnor said:If you wish to bring facts to the discussion kindly do so - if you can show that Black Pete existed before a slaving era Teacher invented him please do.
If not then no amount of slaver over your keyboard is really relevant.
160 years ago Black Pete was added but St Christopher was born about 1700 years earlier than that so yah - pretty recent.
More rant
I experience each culture I encounter with an open mind.... I am adaptable and try to understand differences before drawing random conclusions.Anecdotes are just that - as to the who are you stuff I could ask you the same thing - clearly you wouldnt be stupid enough to argue that a foreigner shouldnt have an opinion on it when you yourself are also a foreigner - I mean surely...
I experience each culture I encounter with an open mind.... I am adaptable and try to understand differences before drawing random conclusions.
My job requires that I understand culture very very quickly in order to ensure the success of cross continent / country projects.
Not all my views on Dutch traditions are positive...... Ie even though I am born a catholic, I abhor carnival and the fact that if you live in the south you can't escape it. However! I was a guest in their country so during carnival season I either escaped North or left the country for a week.
But you like myself would be regarded as an 'allochtoon' - an outsider who should keep their mouth shut in the Black Pete debate.
You seem to have adapted without questioning anything - I try to remain a little more objective.
You move to a country in which it is common to accept their traditions, I fail to see what they're is to 'comply' to? It's correct not to question a countries traditions as long as those migrants are allowed to keep there own, which my understanding from people who have lived in Dutch society (and it'll apply for British society), those migrants haven't had there traditions stamped out?
This is such a non-argument and the same crap that's spouted over here week in week out.
How did you know I didn't question, I lived there for 3 years, during that time I had plenty of time to Forman objective and informed view?
You can not consider yourself objective as you have not tried to understand anything that has been laid before you except the bits that reinforce your view that the depiction of Piet is meant to be racist.
These were kids born in the country, 2nd and 3rd generation migrants - in most countries that is more than enough to be included and treated as an equal citizen.
Using wikipedia as a credible source.
According to the centre for equal opportunities they only get 1-2 complaints about "black pete" every year.
Please cite your sources that conflict or is this just hot air?
Right and when those parents came to the country did they question the tradition then?
I'm more laughing at the fact your basing your entire argument on the internet rather then first person accounts.
Its a funny thing but people who come to a country with the majority from a different ethnicity and struggle to find work do not immediatly march up to town and demand an end to endemic racism.
Clearly by failing to do so they have waived all right to reply...
So you dont have anything except a generic denial - how suprising
Sorry Rynnor but your posts are just making me laugh now so the debate for me is over.
I would not characterise your replies as a debate tbh.
I have the first person accounts of the people who are Dutch and have lived there. What more credible source do you want?
Could you possibly be any more patronising?
By ascribing second-rate citizenship to the critics who aren't considered "Dutch", the authority of the speaker is undermined.