Wildfire said:Right, now the crater. I've circled the best example of what I'm about to describe from your chosen snap in red.
For the minute, let's say that the light is coming from the top left corner as you hypothesise. What you see first is a dark shadow, indicating that for whatever reason, there is a depression around a dome. Everything OK so far. Then you've got the bright light of the sun shining on said dome. Still ok, feasible, even though erosion doesn't cause domes naturally - there is always a weakness found by the wind/water/whatever which causes the shape to become irregular. Then you've got the dark shadow on the far side, indicating that we're dealing with quite a steep slope here that no light reaches. Note also that it's quite large, indicating that we're looking at quite a tall structure. Still, everything checks out. However, you next come to a very bright highlight which would have to be around the depression I mentioned earlier. If the shadow was being caused by a dome, this highlight would not be visible as the shadow would cover it, and extend towards the bottom right of the image.
Hence, we are in fact looking at a crater, more easily visible if the image is rotated 180 degrees.
How are these lights created by a crater? Firstly, craters have a raised lip (see earlier post about this). Starting from the bottom right, you've got the sun shining on the lip. Then you've got the deep, large and spread-out shadow created by the lip on the deep depression inside. Then you've got the opposite side of the crater, onto which the sunlight again shines, creating a bright highlight at the apex. Then, again, you've got shadow - created by the lip around the top-left of the crater.
Any questions? All of this is, by the way, visible on the main crater as well, but I chose the one in the top right as it's more easily visible and describable.
Wildfire said:I'm getting tired of this idiocy.
It's a crater, and they're boulders that have blatantly either rolled down the sides, or landed there as a result of an impact. You're completely wrong when you say they're depressions whether it's a dome or a crater, the light is on the OPPOSITE side on the objects (dark in the top left, light in the bottom right), meaning that they're the OPPOSITE to the crater/dome in/on which they sit.
Wildfire said:Don't make me post my uni snaps again and make you look like even more stupid than you've already managed on your own.
Edit: And the rocks are illuminated on the lower-right side. Open your eyessssss.
Wildfire said:No. Unlike the moon, mars has wind you fucktard. Dust blows and settles on mars just like it does here.
Next.
Wildfire said:No k9. Because of the exact opposite. Because the wind is disturbed by the crater and eddies of stillness form, dust and particles settle out of the wind and drop to the floor. You're really trying hard today but what you're forgetting is that I am actually more educated than your average forum peon.
Anyway. Next.
Wildfire said:No k9. Because of the exact opposite. Because the wind is disturbed by the crater and eddies of stillness form, dust and particles settle out of the wind and drop to the floor. You're really trying hard today but what you're forgetting is that I am actually more educated than your average forum peon.
weird ayeMaybe the most amazing story of the century is that there really is life on Mars! Maybe current civilization. I think alot of the structural areas look pretty intact, I would expect less definition if these were ruins from an ancient civilization
Wildfire said:you do realise that physics are exactly the same on mars as they are on earth... in so far as geology, erosion, gravity and planet formation go, it's all been explained already, and what you're talking about has all been complete and total rubbish