Arethir said:The people who made the rules...? That's the whole reason behind making them...? As I said earlier. The "fg crowd" does not like to be ressick, having ld's, being unbuffed or whatever when they engage in a fight. It removes the whole reason for them to do it. They want to test their skills vs enemy players, and they wont get to do that if one of the parts are not suiting a full team.
Arethir said:But judging from your statements, you have no clue how frustrating getting rolled over and over, and spending your whole night rebuffing and boating can be.
Arethir said:Yes. In YOUR opinion.
In the old days if you killed a group, you fked off to somewhere save. Always on the lookout for potential inc.
Then someone made some certain rule about resting in a fop would grand immunity, so "hey" why not go rest in the middle of agramon, which is even more ridiculess in more ways then one.
I could make a rule right now, saying: Tuthmes is always right on FH. Just making "your/our rule" and have or make other people play by them isnt exactly democratic, nor fair. You are making people play the way you like/want it, or they can foad. If you choose not to play by "those rules, you'll get added on, kicked from mIrc, etc, etc.
Just keep it to one simple rule, don't add. And yes, this usually also means leaving a group who just hade a fight.
Ke.
Yes in HIS opinion. But, mine also for that matter. Try to have an open mind for other peoples opinions. It sure is what i've done for over year with all those fop's in the middle of agramon ffs.
Well it got kind of booring having to leg it for 5 minutes to get to a safe-spot, like we used to do on dyvet before the "incident" and all that shit.In the old days if you killed a group, you fked off to somewhere save. Always on the lookout for potential inc.
Then someone made some certain rule about resting in a fop would grand immunity, so "hey" why not go rest in the middle of agramon, which is even more ridiculess in more ways then one.
Dude, the people playing in this zone, are the people who want to play by these rules. If some people want to play by a different set of rules, then why not go to some different zone fgs? Noone is making anyone play in a way they dont want to. But if you come into the fg zone, and you add, then lol, expect to get added on! Read: "Treat them as you would like to be treated." And as for IRC. If the channel is made by a group of people who invite others to play in a certain zone with certain rules, then the whole reason for being in that IRC channel is to play with those people, in those zones, with those rules, ye? So it's not really rocketscience if you'd get kicked for not playing by those rules. Because then you simply don't have anything to do there. You choose yourself not to be a part of it. But why don't you try and make your own zone to RvR with the kind of rules that you like to follow, and make people join you there, instead of whining at how other people prefer to play the game. Because hey, if what you say is true, and this is not a democratic process, then you'd get a whole lot of players coming over to your way of playing!I could make a rule right now, saying: Tuthmes is always right on FH. Just making "your/our rule" and have or make other people play by them isnt exactly democratic, nor fair. You are making people play the way you like/want it, or they can foad. If you choose not to play by "those rules, you'll get added on, kicked from mIrc, etc, etc.
Yes, it usually does. So you expect it to happen. And when it doesn't, you might get a little upset. When it happens repeatedly, from the same group, you might even start disliking them, and you'll start returning the favour, which will turn into a bitch-war, where you might stop seeing the difference from "just after the fight", to "when the fight has already been won, even if 2-3 still alive from the enmies", to "add on the m*f*ckers!!" We all know how whiny and bitchy some people can get. Some say an eye for an eye, some might take two eyes for an eye, and it evolves. Anyhow, the rules are really really basic. To me they are, as I've said like 4-5 times already "Treat people as you would like to be treated."Just keep it to one simple rule, don't add. And yes, this usually also means leaving a group who just hade a fight.
??
Ok. Seriously, you're the person not having an open mind here. This aint rocketscience! A group of people enjoy playing the game in this way, so they take initiativ to do so! Why are you whining and bitching about that? You're not having an open mind for their opinions and for their way of playing this game if you don't accept that. If you and Dard wanna play the game in a different way, then by all means, take initiativ to do so, but don't blaim the players who took initiativ to play the game the way they liked it.Yes in HIS opinion. But, mine also for that matter. Try to have an open mind for other peoples opinions. It sure is what i've done for over year with all those fop's in the middle of agramon ffs.
You are making people play the way you like/want it, or they can foad. If you choose not to play by "those rules, you'll get added on, kicked from mIrc, etc, etc.
Wish i could do all that multi quoting shizzle, i'm such a forum n00b
All i can say is i didnt really enjoy the FG scene on Avalon, id rather get the shit kicked out of me roaming, with ld's, lack of buffs etc etc than by a Hi RR group sat around a fop in the FG zone waiting until it suits them to move.
But!
Happy for you guys who enjoy it ...
But!
Doesnt mean i have to agree with it
By all means, go roam where you want, and kill what you want, but if you jump one of these fg vs fg fights, don't be surprised if they all stop fighting eachother and start hunting you down instead. You sound like you have good intentions etc though so I really don't see it becoming a problem
And I don't think people would want the WoW kind of thing. It'd remove the fun out of roaming, getting jumped, getting the jump etc. Alot of the excitement would disappear Choosing the battleground is also very important in the fg scene! Wouldn't want to get some kind of crappy place where you can't play on a ground you're comfortable with. (like odins! people would go blind before they even found a group!)
So if i/my group wanted to play fg vs fg in a zone, without the adding, but also without the silly fop rule, where do i go?!
Dyvet!!1
ur in cm thought have u actually managed to win a fight u add on with 24 vs 8 ? i reckon that is the standard cm group
when we logged eld druid and banshee dont think there was any rangers around and when we was on ranger didnt get crit shot off most they time cos u was laging around that much lol ur lag ghost was runing across the water and evey thing
It's not RvR that you're describing, it's FG duel's run by the old boys club, cant handle a few stealther pops or random add's on your fg fights? pfft dealing with the unexpected is half of it my chums.
Also most of the people bashing on about FG fights used to add like motherfuckers when i played Excal, where did you buy your cool juice from?
I didn't mean that this would take over the RvR system we have, it would be a regulated instanced zone for those who want fg action, an instance that would not allow more than one group for each realm to enter each instance. Normal RvR zones would continue as they are for the roamers and zergers but with the additional instance for those who want regulated fg action.
So if i/my group wanted to play fg vs fg in a zone, without the adding, but also without the silly fop rule, where do i go?!
Well tbh if they run in aggramon its more likely they wont have such problems. Its a known fg zone and even those that do not look FH know about it.
What i think arethir means with it is that when they run in fg zones its more likely they run into other groups that pushes them to the limit and a cheeky stealther might off balance the fight permenantly.
Well tbh if they run in aggramon its more likely they wont have such problems. Its a known fg zone and even those that do not look FH know about it.