If they want to challenge they should be writing papers, no? Would totally back that.
As it is, it's just an opinion piece. And other scientists have written different opinion pieces. So it doesn't really help does it.
Not saying they're wrong here. I kinda don't really care that much. They're talking specifically about sex (not gender, although they mention it earlier on) and I fall down on that side of the argument. But then, I'm not a scientist, so what the fuck do I know. I mean, as far as I used to know information couldn't move faster than light, but quantum entanglement shits all over that. So I'm open to people proving things through science.
Agree in principle, however the issue is that most scientific research in the Gender Studies field
Yeah - don't necessarily disagree about this. @Wij's article sits firmly on the lowest rung there - Editorials and expert opinion (it's simply a letter from scientists and therefore relatively worthless).are basically just opinion pieces with Hypotheses and Conclusions. It is an incredibly difficult field to get anything which counts as valuable scientific evidence imo, which is why I look on it as a bit of a joke. It's what I would count as scientific opinion, not scientific fact. You need to look at the Hierarchy of Evidence Pyramid to see why - also why I find any arguments that revolve around "consensus" massively unconvincing
It just said to stop making shit articles that conflate sex with secondary sexual characteristics and confuse everyone. The science is already in and nothing that the other articles do disproves it. It's not pretending to be a scientific paper. It doesn't need to be.Yeah - don't necessarily disagree about this. @Wij's article sits firmly on the lowest rung there - Editorials and expert opinion (it's simply a letter from scientists and therefore relatively worthless).
I think there was a twitter argument before Alice de-linked or blocked the group for getting abuse apparently. (I don't know, I don't know how it works - don't use it). But yeah, I agree - payscale doesn't denote intelligence. Only cold hard well-designed research should be getting used to further arguments.Doesn't call her a "senior scientist" anywhere in the article. A term without meaning anyway.
The legal group so keen to defend the right to speak the truth, in this case a fundamental, observable scientific truth? The American Civil Liberties Union, a group whose modern day social media presence promotes nonsense like:
"The notion of biological sex was developed for the exclusive purpose of being weaponized against people."
and
"Sex and gender are different words for the same thing [that is] a set of politically and socially contingent notions of embodied and expressed identity."
and shares articles asserting that biological sex is rooted in white supremacy.
Mr Potato Head to lose "Mr" title in gender-neutral rebrand
The toy's maker, Hasbro, says it will drop the "Mr" to "promote gender equality and inclusion".www.bbc.co.uk
What's wrong with saying chest-feeders or womb-havers?I imagine a certain group of people will take high offence to this.
Government agrees to call pregnant women mothers
A bill to give ministers maternity pay will change, after peers reject the use of the term "person".www.bbc.co.uk
What about Mrs Potato head?
Will they just both be called Potato Head. Now that will be confusing
Twitch caves in to pressure on the correct spelling of women from people who aren’t women. Nice.Row Z haha
Twitch backtracks after outcry for using 'gender neutral' term 'womxn'
The streaming platform said it had changed its spelling of "women" to be more gender neutral.www.bbc.co.uk
Row Z haha
Twitch backtracks after outcry for using 'gender neutral' term 'womxn'
The streaming platform said it had changed its spelling of "women" to be more gender neutral.www.bbc.co.uk
SHE would be a riot you transphobeAlex, 31 looks like he would be a riot at parties.
If you will follow the most vocal of the vocal idiots on twitter, which is the platform where the most vocal idiots get the biggest voice.Homophobia is completely on trend now
You miss the point. Lesbians who don't want to date men in dresses ARE getting banned from lesbian dating apps. It's actually happening, not on Twitter.If you will follow the most vocal of the vocal idiots on twitter, which is the platform where the most vocal idiots get the biggest voice.
So that's the most vocal of vocal idiots in vocal idiot land.
What apps?You miss the point. Lesbians who don't want to date men in dresses ARE getting banned from lesbian dating apps. It's actually happening, not on Twitter.