Ctuchik
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2003
- Messages
- 10,467
- Thread starter
- #61
Yeah, the blamegame is ridicilous when one person can't really control it all. Especially since it's EA.
But yeah i know about the DLC and the content, which is why it puzzles me. It's an extra story that is indeed a big part of the lore, but it's still extra. As such, i'd think players would be pleased to pay for good content, not just fluff.
And i'd agree with you if a) it wouldn't have been such a big part of the main story and b) if they had started on it after the game went live.
You can release good content DLC's without making it be this big a part of the main game, as proven with the ME2 DLC's. Only the last one were directly "influencing" the story itself, and that was done in preparation for ME3.
@Wazzer, the only DLC mass effect had were pinnacle station and bring down the sky (the latter is free) and iirc those had nothing to do with the story of the game. Unless you mean ME2 and the last DLC "Arrival", which is somewhat different as it's a bridge between ME2 and ME3. And again, were started on way after the actual game released, so paying for that was fine.
@Mabs, I have no problems with DLC's per se as i've said before. I quite happily pay for extra content or even extra fluff such as the item packs in DA2/ME2 (even if some of the items are horribly overpowered). But i do react when they try to monetize things like this. Zaed for example was free because it didn't involve the story so they wouldn't have gotten the instant cash from it ( /edit: speculation on my part). This DLC is pretty much a must have for anyone who is even the slightest bit of a completionist, so EA knows that almost everyone that bought ME3 will get this DLC to.
So i guess it's not so much the DLC itself as much, but how it's being released.