A lot of outdoor sports are.So Grouse shooting is exempt from Government rules, wouldn't want to ruin any donors weekend plans
I'm not a fan of Grouse shooting however I suspect the only people who won't social distance are the people who protest it
Hunt saboteurs.What are you saying?
People that don't support hunting (and therefore the Tories) are plebs that won't socially distance?
Hunt saboteurs.
But actually I disagree with @Embattle. I've a friend who owns and runs a shoot and I know a couple of people who protest them.
They all responsibly socially distance. If anything, the saboteurs are the more responsible.
I know, but it appears that he's suggesting that people socially distance differently according to their politics.
Which seems like a bizarre statement to me.
You'll keep getting them with the endless dumbass assumptions you tend to make, you really aren't any better than Job as far as I'm concerned....little more than being the opposite side of the same coin.
I guess he proposed that the sabo’s dont know how to social distance. Dont necessarily agree with that. But i dont think he was saying a whole class of people are unclean.What are you saying?
People that don't support hunting (and therefore the Tories) are plebs that won't socially distance?
I guess he proposed that the sabo’s dont know how to social distance. Dont necessarily agree with that. But i dont think he was saying a whole class of people are unclean.
that was all you. And your widening of the subject matter to the nth degree.
Think it was just a throw away comment that wasnt based off any data.I'm not widening the subject at all.
He suggested that a clearly politically divided issue would have one side of people who are capable at social distancing whilst the other isn't.
I'm just confused how he's come to such a conclusion.
But I ain't gonna get an answer just gonna be called Job of the left. Which further proves my point.
But it fits his politics. You know what he thinks through his facepalm patterns but he hasn't the gumption to articulate and discuss like an adult with fully formed ideas.Think it was just a throw away comment that wasnt based off any data.
Sometimes you guys take this place too seriously. Chill for a changeBut it fits his politics. You know what he thinks through his facepalm patterns but he hasn't the gumption to articulate and discuss like an adult with fully formed ideas.
Sometimes you guys take this place too seriously. Chill for a change
I know, but it appears that he's suggesting that people socially distance differently according to their politics.
Which seems like a bizarre statement to me.
This is why the WHO told us not to wear masks for decades.
Practically no one follows the strict procedure.
They are now just a visible badge of conformity to care.
When and how to use masks
WHO's guidance and advice on the use of masks to protect against and limit the spread of COVID-19.www.who.int
I would suggest many people wear masks and do not wash them between uses also they have their hands all over them. And then use those hands on other stuff before washing them.Probably one of the strangest posts you've ever made.
Are you suggesting that no-one follows procedure, and your evidence is a page on how to follow procedure?
I would suggest many people wear masks and do not wash them between uses also they have their hands all over them. And then use those hands on other stuff before washing them.
same with gloves. Virtually pointless in the general population. Unless you change them every change of environment it just gives a false sense of security.
at least masks are somewhat effective even if you use them wrong.
The advice, which was THE scientific consensus up till half way through this pandemic, when it became political and a social media hot potato.
The advantage of partially blocking airborne was far outweighed by the mishandling of masks.
Of course they are 'adjusting' their conclusions to fit the pressures by governments to have a visible fix for getting everyone back together again.
You will notice all the advice is about meeting of groups, masks are barely mentioned and if they were so important the hilarious scenario of maskless pubs and restaurants while having to wear one in Tescos wouldnt be a thing.
Well duh.
If they were serious about masks they wouldnt allow pubs and restaurants to open which is far more dangerous because it attracts the groups and families they are worried about, while Tescos is random people.
Its for the economy, and masks in shops is next to pointless against nightlife.
Public transport is reasonable because of the very enclosed space and time sat next to people.
So you're actually saying that wearing masks is increasing the amount of covid cases?
I think that's a bold statement.