There are some big caveats: The study enrolled people through the Internet and social media, relying on them to report their own symptoms rather than having them tracked in a formal way by doctors. Participants were not all tested for the coronavirus but were diagnosed as COVID-19 cases based on symptoms in many cases. And not all took their medicines as directed.
That's normal procedure when there's no trust in the authors, findings come to light about the quality/honesty of the work.
If it is the same thing I'm thinking about it was the attempt to create a unified/universal digital system for patient records etc (NHS Connecting for Health - Wikipedia), it was started under Labour (Tony Blair) and it produced little more than cost overruns and time delays and was ultimately scrapped. The system is more locally linked now with different computer systems, it is probably why after nearly a year my GP patient records are still missing from my new practice when I moved from London to Devon.
I've always wanted a system that is highly integrated, in essence they could scan my fingerprint and get my medical record and see everything no matter where I was in the UK.
That's normal procedure when there's no trust in the authors, findings come to light about the quality/honesty of the work.
It's not the first time either journal have printed retractions. Some people are won't to falsify their work, which is part of the point of peer review.
System working![]()
It'll be Job, boarding trains and licking every available surface before telling inspectors to CTFOADOCoronavirus.It's far too early to say anything of the sort. The R number (which the Government have decided is actually important again) is above 1 in the north west and at or a fanny hair away from 1 in a load of other regions.
Nw and sw have nearly 1 R. Both areas where the stupid tourists come when the sun shines.It's far too early to say anything of the sort. The R number (which the Government have decided is actually important again) is above 1 in the north west and at or a fanny hair away from 1 in a load of other regions.
Nw and sw have nearly 1 R. Both areas where the stupid tourists come when the sun shines.
North Wales still has a high rate - and judging by the amount of scousers here last weekend...Nw and sw have nearly 1 R. Both areas where the stupid tourists come when the sun shines.
And anyone pointing it out is a racist.Nice to see protesters in London being fucking idiots. I can sympathise with the message but now isn't the time for it, each and everyone of them is essentially responsible for a death because given how many there are, it's almost inevitable at this point that at least one of them don't have Corona and if one of them have it, a lot of them have it.
And anyone pointing it out is a racist.
If it does spike, which tbh I dont think it will.
We need to build a wall around London manchester sheffield and birmingham.
It's far too early to say anything of the sort. The R number (which the Government have decided is actually important again) is above 1 in the north west and at or a fanny hair away from 1 in a load of other regions.
That's amusing as he used to be editor for The Spectator
I'm assuming this is your first experience of The Spectator?
Cool. I'll get a job there and you get a job with the DHSC which announced just shy of 1,600 positive test results just yesterday.You might want to get a job with Astra Zenica with insight like that, you could save them a fortune in moving to Brazil to find infected people to test the vaccine on.
“The most important thing is to carry out this stage of the study now, when the epidemiological curve is still rising and the results may be more assertive,” said Lily Yin Weckx, coordinator of the Reference Center for Special Immunobiologicals (CRIE) at the Federal University of Sao Paulo Unifesp.
I saw his post this morning and was going to call him on his bullshit but figured I'd leave it until I got home, so ta @caLLous