Bloody Iran at it again

Calaen

I am a massive cock who isn't firing atm!
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,538
Not agreeing to the aggressive way of handling things means you don't care about your country? I don't appreciate the way the US and UK are handling things in Iraq and with Iran and such, so I guess that mean's I don't care much for England.

So i guess that means I dont give a fuck? Iraq was necessary regardless, things will settle down and they will be thanking us in the future. Capturing soldiers deserves hardcore response.
 

Saggy

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,237
I did not agree with the war but as we are at war now i support the war for our troops.
Place: In front of Buckingham Palace
Issue: Demonstration - do not attack Iraq
Characters: Crowd and the queen

Crowd: <chanting> "No for war! No for war!"
Crowd: "There is no reason for us to attack!"
Crowd: "We are not the rulers of this world!"
Crowd: <chanting> "No for war! No for war!"
<The queen enters to make a speech, crowd silences to listen>
Queen: "Hi there mates"
Crowd: "Hi there, queen!" <silent voices of chanting "no for war!">
Quenn: "I'm here to announce that our troops have invaded Iraq and we are in war"
<short silence>
Crowd: "Yeah! Kill the fucking Iraqies! Kill em all!"
Crowd: "Kill em! God save the queen!"
Crowd: "We want to see nukes flying!"
Crowd: <chanting> "Huzzaaaah! We are in war! Kill em all!"

:p
 

NikonL

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
648
Place: In front of Buckingham Palace
Issue: Demonstration - do not attack Iraq
Characters: Crowd and the queen

Crowd: <chanting> "No for war! No for war!"
Crowd: "There is no reason for us to attack!"
Crowd: "We are not the rulers of this world!"
Crowd: <chanting> "No for war! No for war!"
<The queen enters to make a speech, crowd silences to listen>
Queen: "Hi there mates"
Crowd: "Hi there, queen!" <silent voices of chanting "no for war!">
Quenn: "I'm here to announce that our troops have invaded Iraq and we are in war"
<short silence>
Crowd: "Yeah! Kill the fucking Iraqies! Kill em all!"
Crowd: "Kill em! God save the queen!"
Crowd: "We want to see nukes flying!"
Crowd: <chanting> "Huzzaaaah! We are in war! Kill em all!"

:p

That's not quite how England works these days :p Our anthem may say god save the Queen, but she doesn't actually do anything, or have any real power. Cept the power to claim any peice of land she likes etc. Anyway, wasn't the Queen opposed to the war?
 

soze

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
12,508
Place: In front of Buckingham Palace
Issue: Demonstration - do not attack Iraq
Characters: Crowd and the queen

Crowd: <chanting> "No for war! No for war!"
Crowd: "There is no reason for us to attack!"
Crowd: "We are not the rulers of this world!"
Crowd: <chanting> "No for war! No for war!"
<The queen enters to make a speech, crowd silences to listen>
Queen: "Hi there mates"
Crowd: "Hi there, queen!" <silent voices of chanting "no for war!">
Quenn: "I'm here to announce that our troops have invaded Iraq and we are in war"
<short silence>
Crowd: "Yeah! Kill the fucking Iraqies! Kill em all!"
Crowd: "Kill em! God save the queen!"
Crowd: "We want to see nukes flying!"
Crowd: <chanting> "Huzzaaaah! We are in war! Kill em all!"

:p

LOL im not that bad :)

What i mean is i did not agree whith Why Bush and Blair decided to attack but now its the people giving there lives to serve in the armed forces that are in there they deserve the UK support.

These morons who stand at Army bases and moan at the troops need to realise if they don't go to war they go to prision.
 

Saggy

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,237
What i mean is i did not agree whith Why Bush and Blair decided to attack but now its the people giving there lives to serve in the armed forces that are in there they deserve the UK support.
Yeah, the soldiers didn't make the decision and they are just doing what they are told to do - suppose the "right" way to support them is feeling sorry they had to go there and wish they get home alive (yet not supporting what they are doing). They dont deserve to get treated like Vietnam veterans who were "looser assholes" when they got home but they are not heroes either.
 

Straef

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Feb 21, 2004
Messages
5,890
So i guess that means I dont give a fuck? Iraq was necessary regardless, things will settle down and they will be thanking us in the future. Capturing soldiers deserves hardcore response.
I didn't say that. I meant it's silly to assume someone doesn't care for his country simply because he doesn't agree with some of the things that go on there, like military actions.
Iraq wasn't necessary, they weren't a threat, and the whole weapons of mass destruction shit was based on nothing, which has been proven after the US decided to invade the country.
Now I'm not saying getting rid of Saddam was a bad thing, as he wasn't exactly the best leader a country could wish for, but saying it was necessary for countries like the US and UK to invade is bullshit.
Capturing soldiers does deserve response, but they should try to keep it diplomatic and the idea of bombing the place is just retarded.
 

soze

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
12,508
Yeah, the soldiers didn't make the decision and they are just doing what they are told to do - suppose the "right" way to support them is feeling sorry they had to go there and wish they get home alive (yet not supporting what they are doing). They dont deserve to get treated like Vietnam veterans who were "looser assholes" when they got home but they are not heroes either.
Yep your right that is a much better way of saying what i meant :)
 

Rookiescot

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
816
Still no reply Ingafgrinn? Or are you still researching evidence that Iran dont want nukes ?
 

Thadius

Part of the furniture
Joined
Sep 5, 2004
Messages
8,824
Wonder what the next letetr is gonna be?

Dear Infidel back home,

Allah is the almighty, Uran deserves nukes so they can bring down the West. Death to the Infidel.

Lots of love

Faye Turney
 

Saggy

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,237
[Off-topic] (more than already that is ;p)
Our economy is one the worlds strongest, we put more money into the EU then most other countries and in return we get screwed over at every corner.
This year Finland paid 440 million €uros to EU and 7% (112 million) of that to help UK to pay their share because of UK's special treatment :p Neither Finland or UK are in top5 payers though.
 

tris-

Failed Geordie and Parmothief
Joined
Jan 2, 2004
Messages
15,260
is this whole ordeal related to the sudden rise in petrol prices?

i havent really kept up with the news latley, but ive noticed the prices going from 84p - 89p a litre
 

Dukat

Resident Freddy
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Messages
5,396
This year Finland paid 440 million €uros to EU and 7% (112 million) of that...

7% of 440 is 112? huh?

Or have I missed something?

Where did you get these figures? Whatever your source is, if its saying 7% of 440 million is 112 million, then I have to wonder at how reliable thier information is.


(sorry if I read that wrong and missed something)


On topic: not sure about all this, however all I can think of atm is that if we do go into Iran, we should go in, reduce thier ability to wage war to 0%, then leave them to it. Occupying a foreign country and trying to show them democracy is a noble but imo misguided - if they want democracy, just drop a leaflet on every town with words to the effect of "we've rendered you're dictator defenceless, if you want democracy, nows your chance to go and take it".

Obviously this would never happen though, too many people with an agenda. No idea whats going to happen in the middle east, only that its probably not going to be pretty.
 

Saggy

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,237
7% of 440 is 112? huh?

Or have I missed something?

Where did you get these figures? Whatever your source is, if its saying 7% of 440 million is 112 million, then I have to wonder at how reliable thier information is.
Sorry, 7% of total amount of cash (~1 519 million euros) - Source
 

yaruar

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,617
[Off-topic] (more than already that is ;p)

This year Finland paid 440 million €uros to EU and 7% (112 million) of that to help UK to pay their share because of UK's special treatment :p Neither Finland or UK are in top5 payers though.

The UK is still the 2nd highest net contributer to the EU even after the rebate though, and without it would by far and away be the largest net contributer, because we subsides all your arses out there and get squat back.
 

Saggy

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,237
The UK is still the 2nd highest net contributer to the EU even after the rebate though, and without it would by far and away be the largest net contributer, because we subsides all your arses out there and get squat back.
Top4 net contributers: 1) Germany 2) Sweden 3) Netherlands 4) Italy - iirc and can't be arsed to google it :cool:
 

yaruar

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,617
Top4 net contributers: 1) Germany 2) Sweden 3) Netherlands 4) Italy - iirc and can't be arsed to google it :cool:

I've only got the 2005 figures to refer to and swedens TOTAL contribution was only about 10% of the uk contribution.. Although you could be talking net contribution as a percentage of total contribution. I was talking total net contribution..

THe uk was approximately 10 billion net contribution before rebate, so about 4.5bn afterwards. Germany was higher at about 7bn net, sweden was probably less than 1bn netherlands about 4 maybe.

Personally i think everyone shoudl get pissed off with france who pull huge agriculture subsadies and refuse to give them up, which is the reason why the UK won't give up it's rebate because we are sick to death of paying for french farmers to get pissed.
 

Ingafgrinn Macabre

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jan 4, 2004
Messages
3,155
Still no reply Ingafgrinn? Or are you still researching evidence that Iran dont want nukes ?
Nope, had some computer problems, and kinda forgot about this thread. Only now just saw it again...

If you check my post history, you'll see that I haven't posted anything between the 26'th and y'day, and the posts of today were all in thesame thread ;)
 

Thadius

Part of the furniture
Joined
Sep 5, 2004
Messages
8,824
USA has stepped in now with the Iran bashing!

There is also a topic about racism in general if any of you fancy further reading
 

Krait

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
607
After the usual tv appearances and sabre rattling........... they get freed.
See you all again next year ! :p
 

Thadius

Part of the furniture
Joined
Sep 5, 2004
Messages
8,824
They are free now, which is good!

I see it as a major coup for Iran though, they humilated Britain
 

Marc

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
11,094
They are free now, which is good!

I see it as a major coup for Iran though, they humilated Britain

I see it the other way. They have made themselves look right idiots. They wanted the uk to admit they were in iran waters. We wouldnt. So then they expect the rest of the world to believe the "hostages" wrote those letters of their own free will. I also suspect the british servicemen were kidnapped to use in exchange for the Iranians who are being held by the USA, again failing miserably. I guess the Iranian PM just wanted to cut his losses
 

DocWolfe

Part of the furniture
Joined
Jan 3, 2005
Messages
2,855
Now its safe to Nuke them as there are no English people there.
 

Mojo

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 27, 2004
Messages
1,940
They are free now, which is good!

I see it as a major coup for Iran though, they humilated Britain

Mr Ahmadinejad said no concessions had been made by the British government to secure the releases. :m00:
 

Dukat

Resident Freddy
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Messages
5,396
I see it the other way. They have made themselves look right idiots. They wanted the uk to admit they were in iran waters. We wouldnt. So then they expect the rest of the world to believe the "hostages" wrote those letters of their own free will. I also suspect the british servicemen were kidnapped to use in exchange for the Iranians who are being held by the USA, again failing miserably. I guess the Iranian PM just wanted to cut his losses

Agree mostly, however as far as I understand it the iranian PM is little more than an elected smooth talker - the supreme leader cleric type person seems to be the one calling the shots in iran, since I havent seen anything of him throughout all of this I would imagine he's the one behind it, with the PM basically being the one who goes on TV and gets people fired up about decisions that have already been made.

Iran hasnt done much more than piss people off, I reckon they're making as much fuss about this to try and distract people from the fact that they've still got a nuclear weapons program running.
 

dub

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
700
to most of the world i assume it looks like iran just proven that US holds no leverage on them , both in this case and regarding the nuclear program.

looks like that from here atleast :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom