Darzil
Fledgling Freddie
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2004
- Messages
- 2,651
Why is it double standards?
Expecting others to abide by international law when you don't ?
Darzil
Why is it double standards?
Expecting others to abide by international law when you don't ?
Darzil
Is there any reason why, for example, Finland wouldn't be able to start war against UK with your standards?* UK does have nuclear weapons, that alone is enough to start the war? The thing is that NATO ruled over UN when the Iraq war started - it has nothing to do with "hating" US/UK.According to not just the uk and us, but other countries, the advice they were given before they invaded iraq was that the war wouldnt be illegal. Although the US/Uk haters will ofc say they are lying
* worry not, UK has nothing anyone needs on that tiny island![]()
Actually I wish our economy would be 10% from the current valueyour just jealous our economy blows yours out the water![]()
Yeah, that's a good reason for us not to attackFinland couldn't start a war with the UK because they would get their asses kicked. :|
Finland couldn't start a war with the UK because they would get their asses kicked :|, it would be like a fly starting war on a rhino.
Is there any reason why, for example, Finland wouldn't be able to start war against UK with your standards?* UK does have nuclear weapons, that alone is enough to start the war? The thing is that NATO ruled over UN when the Iraq war started - it has nothing to do with "hating" US/UK.
With the sort of patriotism seen in this thread it would be best if UK leaves EU and stands up admitting they give a flying fuck about anyone else? Keep on wanking over the queen's picture and chanting how superior your nation is - after acting like total ***** for ages and ages I actually understand the reasons why UK needs nuclear weapons...
* worry not, UK has nothing anyone needs on that tiny island![]()
Such an constuctive reply!lol such uk hating.
Such an constuctive reply!(I did ask fairly direct questions you know)
With the sort of patriotism seen in this thread it would be best if UK leaves EU and stands up admitting they give a flying fuck about anyone else? Keep on wanking over the queen's picture and chanting how superior your nation is - after acting like total ***** for ages and ages I actually understand the reasons why UK needs nuclear weapons...
* worry not, UK has nothing anyone needs on that tiny island![]()
Because your reply was just a tirade against the UK. Anyway, on topic. Do all countries with Nuclear weapons have to sign some treaty or something?
"Nukes" were a tiny part of the plan or the plan was, erm, totally fucked up OoCorran said:Not saying we acted correctly in Iraqi, and there was more reasons to it then simple nukes. Didnt go to war for any single reason but that was a big part of it admitingly.
YeahCorran said:Support the country? Of course I do!
Finland aint perfect but we dont see we are the "superior nation" who can tell others how to live.Corran said:See faults in way it acts? Yes. (But i guess Finland perfect sag's)
Personally I'm nationalist - I support my country because I like our culture, not because of been patriot who thinks my country is the best.Corran said:Patriot? Yes - problem is the Royal family got some twats in it (Charles and Andrew) and alot of the power lays in the government and not them. And so I support my country but dont always agree.
Yet again - who were US collation to go and say people how to live?Corran said:Change is always hard, hence the civil war in Iraq. However there really only one side that going all out on an offencive killing without reason and that is not the US/UK collition, unlike the many suicide/random bombers out there.
Sure it wasBecause your reply was just a tirade against the UK. Anyway, on topic. Do all countries with Nuclear weapons have to sign some treaty or something?
You admit that you believe UK is the superior nation who should have the power to say others how to live? Fair enough, I dont care - just dont try to "flavour" it by meanless words.Hasn't it already been proven that people were treated like dogs, quite literally, in Guantanamo Bay? And I recall seeing a documentary on television featuring some people who, eventually, got released from Guantanamo when it turned out they did fuck all wrong, and surely the makers of the documentary would've needed some proof to back that up.Do you have any concrete evidence for these acusations?
Not many like the Queen, its just a throwback to our dodgy past. She is a german anyway, with a son who is a twat with big ears.
Im patriotic yes, but the UK is shite now. Too many people have moved here in order to sponge of our state system, Eastern Europeans, Africans, you name it.
People say support the BNP and your racist. Thats a load of shit. A lot of people I know voted for the BNP and they are no way racist. They are just sick of the shit state the Uk is in now. You have people flocking here yet do not want to integrate and some want to kill us because women here dont wear tents over thier heads.
I wish we would become like the Aussie atm, if you dont bring anything to the country,m dont bother coming because you are not welcome.
Is there any reason why, for example, Finland wouldn't be able to start war against UK with your standards?* UK does have nuclear weapons, that alone is enough to start the war? The thing is that NATO ruled over UN when the Iraq war started - it has nothing to do with "hating" US/UK.
Not agreeing to the aggressive way of handling things means you don't care about your country? I don't appreciate the way the US and UK are handling things in Iraq and with Iran and such, so I guess that mean's I don't care much for England.You seem to like very little about this country, why dont you fuck off to Iran![]()
No, I dont see us getting any support at all - but the question is can UK whine a single bit or are they forced to say "yes, we deserve this war and saw it coming, sorry folks"? Or does the "double standard" monster strike again? Or is UK just so superior they should be allowed to do as they wish?You could try but seeing as we are already a Nuke owning country i doubt you would get much support. But if we started to develop a new kind of super nuke that put the whole world in danger then i bet you would get alot of support from the rest of the world in invading us to disarm us![]()
No, I dont see us getting any support at all - but the question is can UK whine a single bit or are they forced to say "yes, we deserve this war and saw it coming, sorry folks"? Or does the "double standard" monster strike again? Or is UK just so superior they should be allowed to do as they wish?![]()
The war would be between Iran and Israel - once the first nuke lands and Iran threats to send next one to UK then feel free to wipe them out, before that its not our business.Saggy, i send you a PM later if i get time. But you got to take the stability of the people in control into account when you talking about these weapons. Need 2 authorisation codes to launch british nukes (good thing - blair aint stable afteral) etc. If Iran had them there would be no safety measures. Look at the guy in control. Moment they have it they will try blackmail israel, fail and nukes would be sent both ways... or that is what i think is most likely anyways.
The war would be between Iran and Israel - once the first nuke lands and Iran threats to send next one to UK then feel free to wipe them out, before that its not our business.
Yes, it could lead to WW3.It will be though, America has a hell of a lot of Jews in it. America will go defend Israel, UK will support them as if they dont, it will compromise our own secuirty as we are getting rid of our nukes etc
Yes, it could lead to WW3.

No, I dont see us getting any support at all - but the question is can UK whine a single bit or are they forced to say "yes, we deserve this war and saw it coming, sorry folks"? Or does the "double standard" monster strike again? Or is UK just so superior they should be allowed to do as they wish?![]()
Do you have any concrete evidence for these acusations?