Helme
Resident Freddy
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2004
- Messages
- 3,161
The cost argument isn't entirely honest in my opinion because if you want to enjoy console games you're going to have to invest in a decent TV. Sure a lot of people already owns one, especially if they're slightly older. You could also make the argument that the TV can be used for something else entirely, which is true - but so can a computer.
On top of that you're going to be paying $20 extra per game on the consoles. It adds up if you game a lot.
And yeah, you're going to have to deal with upgrades on the PC but in the last few years the prices for good hardware has gone down significantly, and because we're stuck with this consoles generation for at least a couple of years more you don't have to upgrade as often. My 3 year old computer still plays new games, sure not at max graphics anymore but they still run better, and look better than the console versions, which is very acceptable considering I paid £280 for all of it.
On top of that you're going to be paying $20 extra per game on the consoles. It adds up if you game a lot.
And yeah, you're going to have to deal with upgrades on the PC but in the last few years the prices for good hardware has gone down significantly, and because we're stuck with this consoles generation for at least a couple of years more you don't have to upgrade as often. My 3 year old computer still plays new games, sure not at max graphics anymore but they still run better, and look better than the console versions, which is very acceptable considering I paid £280 for all of it.