God damn i could eat a steak now![]()
The fact is by design we are omnivorous, if people want to be vegetarian thats fine but there is absolutely nothing wrong with eating meat and people who do choose not to should stop going on at those who do. (yes i know nobody here is etc)
Surely not eating an already dead animal is the greatest waste of life?
What about having sex with animals? Do vegetarians find that offensive?
Do we really have to go through all the song and dance with you again?
Why is it if you go over to a vegetarian for dinner they won't cook you a steak or a sausage, yet if they come over to yours, you gotta go out of your way to make them some vegetarian dish.
They won't even ask if you don't mind not having meat. Certainly wouldn't offer to cook you a steak. Not even a chicken's bum on a rice cake.
Its not a bitch when places don't have menus that support vegetarians. Its their own damn fault for choosing to live a dietary life that is different to 75% of the population on the planet. Fuck em.
because it isn't interfering with your belief/culture, to throw together a salad for them. they don't want to deal with meat, period.
eat what i make or fuck off.
That's the whole point of this thread - it shouldn't be too hard to make a special portion of a dinner, especially if someone is your quest, with meat. Got to respect that. It has to work both ways or neither ways.It shouldn't be too hard to make a special portion of a dinner, especially if someone is your guest, without meat. Got to respect that.
Why is it if you go over to a vegetarian for dinner they won't cook you a steak or a sausage, yet if they come over to yours, you gotta go out of your way to make them some vegetarian dish.
They won't even ask if you don't mind not having meat. Certainly wouldn't offer to cook you a steak. Not even a chicken's bum on a rice cake.
That's the whole point of this thread - it shouldn't be too hard to make a special portion of a dinner, especially if someone is your quest, with meat. Got to respect that. It has to work both ways or neither ways.
It's not exactly the same though. If you invite someone over for dinner you don't have to make their favourite dish, but you should at least make something they can eat. You wouldn't serve fish to someone who's allergic to fish either, would you? Non-vegetarians can eat a dish without meat, vegetarians cannot eat a dish with meat. Unless it's your belief that it's wrong to eat a dish without meat, of course.That's the whole point of this thread - it shouldn't be too hard to make a special portion of a dinner, especially if someone is your quest, with meat. Got to respect that. It has to work both ways or neither ways.
Vegetarian doesn't have to think that eating meat is wrong to be vegetarian, vegetarian is a person who doesn't eat meat for whatever reason - which, from my experience, is usually that they dont like the taste of it. Is it the special tittle "vegetarian" that gives them better treatment? Should we give similar tittle to people who dont eat dish without meat? Carnivorians or something? "I made some veggie dish, hope you like it" -> "Sorry, can't eat it, I'm carnivorian".It's not exactly the same though. If you invite someone over for dinner you don't have to make their favourite dish, but you should at least make something they can eat. You wouldn't serve fish to someone who's allergic to fish either, would you? Non-vegetarians can eat a dish without meat, vegetarians cannot eat a dish with meat. Unless it's your belief that it's wrong to eat a dish without meat, of course.
that is probably the funniest/stupidest thing i've ever read.
If I were to ask a vegetarian over for dinner, I would serve a dish without meat. If I were to invite my friend who doens't like rice over for dinner, I wouldn't make a rice dish either. It just seems a bit silly to do: "Hey, do you want to come over for dinner? I'll make that dish that always makes you puke." As I said: cooking their favourite meal isn't necessary, but it's common courtesy to cook something that doesn't make them puke and/or doesn't go against their beliefs.Saggy said:Vegetarian doesn't have to think that eating meat is wrong to be vegetarian, vegetarian is a person who doesn't eat meat for whatever reason - which, from my experience, is usually that they dont like the taste of it. Is it the special tittle "vegetarian" that gives them better treatment? Should we give similar tittle to people who dont eat dish without meat? Carnivorians or something? "I made some veggie dish, hope you like it" -> "Sorry, can't eat it, I'm carnivorian".
Yes, naturally. Should this have something to do with my post?If I were to ask a vegetarian over for dinner, I would serve a dish without meat. If I were to invite my friend who doens't like rice over for dinner, I wouldn't make a rice dish either. It just seems a bit silly to do: "Hey, do you want to come over for dinner? I'll make that dish that always makes you puke." As I said: cooking their favourite meal isn't necessary, but it's common courtesy to cook something that doesn't make them puke and/or doesn't go against their beliefs.