Apparently etc.
There was also a leak found on Amazon which basically confirms the earlier leaked prices.
Well that's kind of obvious isn't it (and not ironic)? The performance graph has a much gentler curve than the price one (because the highest performance chips are never aimed at the mainstream consumer so they can get away with charging more) so the most expensive chips will always be towards the bottom of a price/performance graph.Ironic that the fastest is down the bottom simply because it is so expensive at over £1500, if nothing else the Ryzen might make Intel prices come down and perhaps increase release development.
Pricing released for 7 series - quite expensive i might say.
beats?u w0t m8.
1700 @ £320 beats intels £420 6800
1700X @ £400 beats intels £600 6850
1800X @ 500 beats intels £1000 6900
Wait for the 4/6 cores if the 8 core stuff doesn't appeal.
I think the 1500X will be the 4 core and the 1600X the 6 core.
beats?
Hopefully, but let's wait for real game benchmarks with decent consumer mobos from Asus etc first
beats?
Hopefully, but let's wait for real game benchmarks with decent consumer mobos from Asus etc first
▷ AMD Ryzen 7 "Zen" | OVERCLOCKERS UKAny pre-built bundles?
I thought they'd said IPC was comparable to Intels.If they have decreased the instruction set or the pathways in the chip then they wont need to get that high in ghz.