Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Hibernia' started by sphir, Mar 14, 2005.
Slash because Zerkers savages Shadowblades hunters are weak to it. Their chainwearers are resistsant to it.
Vs albs slash is neutral vs everything.
Neutral Vs all mids
Mercenaries Clerics Reavers + Whatever other chain wearers are Resistant to crush. Friars and infils are weak to it..................
Think id rather have the high dps vs mid light tanks and neutral vs albs. Than get really shit dmg on mercenaries clerics and reavers and nuetral vs everything else but the classes the enemy grp only ever MIGHT have 1 of. (Friar or paladin sometimes neither).
crush so that i wont feel like such an idiot for activating mine as it
I've seen mid grp with 3 studded armor wearers only a few times in nf, however every mid grp consists of 3 healer + shaman + often another chain wearer, so often it's 5 ppl in mid grp in slash resistant armor.
And all the alb groups but FC are caster based including 1 pally or friar.
some groups have 2 zerkers some dont, what would be best to choose?
slash = good vs mid studded, bad worse chain (most mid grp have atleast 1 or 2 studded guys) neutral vs albs
crush = good vs alb chain and reinforced (?), anyway, entire grp is usually in either chain, plate or cloth... neutral vs mids
There again, u play mid so u dont really know.
so overall slash would be best to choose for malice as 2h?
Make ur own decision.
Moksi is blades speced BM and Stajj often picks tanks at first so at this point slash is a way better from and/or his point of view.
But anyway it's Disc who makes my zerker hurt
And he/she is going to respec to CS as i see from trade forum. So u could also PM Disc.
I wouldnt have bother asked here then, but i think ill go for slash