Politics 2024/25 General Election Voting Intention (2022)

Who do you currently intend to vote for in the next UK general election?

  • Conservatives

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Labour

    Votes: 14 60.9%
  • SNP

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 3 13.0%
  • DUP

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • SDLP

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Green

    Votes: 3 13.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 1 4.3%

  • Total voters
    23

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
38,085
I guess they own the land so it's not as easy as the po po rocking up?
If I own land, it doesn't mean I get to run an illegal dump.

You can face prison, prosecution and unlimited fine (and cleanup costs). The problem being is that this is normally on the landowner - so if it's public land, who do you prosecute?

But if you're dumping shit on public land, that's still a matter for the police.

If we're going to remove human rights, lets remove them from fly tippers and their associates. Summary execution - Judge Dredd style.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,360
If I own land, it doesn't mean I get to run an illegal dump.

You can face prison, prosecution and unlimited fine (and cleanup costs). The problem being is that this is normally on the landowner - so if it's public land, who do you prosecute?

But if you're dumping shit on public land, that's still a matter for the police.

If we're going to remove human rights, lets remove them from fly tippers and their associates. Summary execution - Judge Dredd style.

No, I'm saying stopping them running an illegal dump isn't as easy as the old bill turning up.

Does make you wonder though, is a blind eye being turned because it alleviates pressures?
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
38,085
Violence against women is a National Emergency and changing attitudes amongst boys and young men is at the centre of the government's strategy:


Given that men are 3-4 times more likely to be victims of assault than women, it's a bit rich that sex is the focal point for this.

On domestic abuse? Lesbian couples are 60% more likely to experience domestic abuse in their relationship than heterosexual couples.

Maybe political correctness isn't helping us put resources where they're most needed eh? Maybe identity politics is driving a wedge between us. Maybe we're all just full of shit since we don't seem to care about truth any more.
 

Deebs

Chief Arsewipe
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 11, 1997
Messages
9,077,417
Violence against women is a National Emergency and changing attitudes amongst boys and young men is at the centre of the government's strategy:


Given that men are 3-4 times more likely to be victims of assault than women, it's a bit rich that sex is the focal point for this.

On domestic abuse? Lesbian couples are 60% more likely to experience domestic abuse in their relationship than heterosexual couples.

Maybe political correctness isn't helping us put resources where they're most needed eh? Maybe identity politics is driving a wedge between us. Maybe we're all just full of shit since we don't seem to care about truth any more.
This is just so scary. In 1,000 years (NOTE: could be a lot less, this is a wild guess) we will be cavewomen/men again as it seems we are losing our ability to think correctly.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
38,085
Jeesus Starmer. What are you fucking thinking?

So, legal advisor on planning has quit due to disagreements on how fast to strip back planning rules...


He's fully accepting the recommendation of an economist on nuclear planning rules - against this advisor's judgement (and risking EU ire as they wouldn't be able to do this but for Brexit) - and "asking the business secretary to apply these lessons across the entire industrial strategy."

Some of the advice Starmer is taking and pushing through?

changing rules around protected species and increasing radiation limits for those living near or working in a nuclear power plant

Yep. Fuck the environment and fuck the people.

There is no safe limit for radiation btw - it's a dose-response relationship. More = more risky.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
38,085
Labour slowly vying to bring about blasphemy laws back in via the back door:


Muslims are fair game as targets of ridicule for their beliefs. Just as the victims of any religions are. It's one of the most effective ways we have to demonstrate their intellectual idiocy and reconsider their position.

Whilst we're at it, we should go the other way - protecting free speech and banning the abhorrent halal practice - which would be illegal for the vast majority of the UK population. Just not muslims and jews. They get a free pass in law that allows them to hurt animals. It's disgusting and wrong, and creates a two-tier legal system in Blighty.
 
Last edited:

Deebs

Chief Arsewipe
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 11, 1997
Messages
9,077,417
Labour slowly vying to bring about blasphemy laws back in via the back door:


Muslims are fair game as targets of ridicule for their beliefs. Just as the victims of any religions are. It's one of the most effective ways we have to demonstrate their intellectual idiocy and reconsider their position.

Whilst we're at it, we should go the other way - protecting free speech and banning the abhorrent halal practice - which would be illegal for the vast majority of the UK population. Just not muslims and jews. They get a free pass in law that allows them to hurt animals. It's disgusting and wrong, and creates a two-tier legal system in Blighty.
Welcome to North Korea v2.0.

Agree with the banning of halal practice. At least stun the animals before cruelty commences.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
38,085
88% of halal is stunned
Apologist for animal cruelty.

UK law, without religious exemption, means 100% of animals must be stunned.

As someone who kills his own animals I know exactly what that means.

Shall we open ourselves up to accusations of "antisemitism"?

100% of Kosher meat is not stunned. Stunning is prohibited. Therefore 100% of faithfully-practicing Jewry in the UK are disgusting, cruel, inhumane animal torturers, benefitting from a two-tier legal system which could see non-Jews fined or imprisoned.

There's no excuse. Both practices, born out of appeasing religious barbarism, should be banned.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom