Politics 2024/25 General Election Voting Intention (2022)

Who do you currently intend to vote for in the next UK general election?

  • Conservatives

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Labour

    Votes: 14 60.9%
  • SNP

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 3 13.0%
  • DUP

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • SDLP

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Green

    Votes: 3 13.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 1 4.3%

  • Total voters
    23

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,119
I picked China because it's the obvious one. But pick a country.

I know people will choose the cheapest thing, rather than ethically buy - which is why we should regulate. That's the whole point of governments.

Not in a capitalist democracy it's the duty to get the cheapest shit possible, and be the furthest away from the bottom of the capitalist pyramid as possible.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,119
It's Labour's version of gerrymandering.

So many reform votes though, maybe that's the point, split the vote.

As for gerrymandering, play the game so long as its allowed. Atleast we're not the US!
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,482
As for gerrymandering, play the game so long as its allowed. Atleast we're not the US!
Principles, dear boy.

If Starmer shows no adherence to principles then it shows that if he was in the US he'd do exactly the same.

Which brings me on to my next post, and the principles that Labour have absolutley abandoned...
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,482
Gawd damn this is why I hate Labour - their wholesale adoption of Orwellian Newspeak:


Now, I hate Diane Abbot as much as the next guy. But saying that racism that people of colour experience because everyone can see they're people of colour, and racism that white people experience when they're members of a minority - e.g. travellers or jewish people - are different experiences is just plain true.

Labour are calling her antisemitic for pointing out this truth.

This is wholesale mind-capture and the use of language as a cage to make thought-crime impossible.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,482
1753295916589.png

I mean, I might get this printed on a t-shirt and see how many people try to start fights with me :)
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,482
Big miscarriage of justice this, posted about it a fair few times:

What really needs to happen is that the government and banking heads who knowingly were doing this need to go to jail. From the PM, to the BoE head and on down. They threw these guys to the wall.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,119

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,482
So the article says:
Sir Keir said recognition of a Palestinian state had to be part of a "wider plan which ultimately results in a two-state solution"

Which really means:
Sir Keir, a committed zionist who's children are being brought up jewish, who said Israel has the right to collectively punish all Palestinians by witholding power and water, regurgitated the "two-state solution" lie to placate the idiot mind-captured western populace

There is no two state solution. Peace and zionism are not compatible. This ends with either zionism dead (lol) or the palestinians dead, exiled or in an utterly battered fifth-class citizens in an open prison camp.

Israel is a disgusting zionist piece of shit that needs 'wiping off the map', and replacing with a secular state. Preferably with a different name that isn't so emotive.
 

BloodOmen

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
18,364
That dark humoured part of me is like... "fuck it, vote reform next election" because I want to see farage get fucked when he has power and not know how to use it.

I sure as hell won't be voting Conservative Light or Conservative anymore thats for sure, useless twats

At this point its either abstain from voting, vote green (lol no chance of them ever getting anywhere because their plans cost too much to put into place) or vote reform for a dark humoured chuckle
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,119
So the article says:


Which really means:


There is no two state solution. Peace and zionism are not compatible. This ends with either zionism dead (lol) or the palestinians dead, exiled or in an utterly battered fifth-class citizens in an open prison camp.

Israel is a disgusting zionist piece of shit that needs 'wiping off the map', and replacing with a secular state. Preferably with a different name that isn't so emotive.

That's hardly a realistic option.

The realistic option I see is putting UN troops on the ground, this is literally what the UN was created for, and they need to be there long term.

I don't think you'd be able to create a single Palestinian and Israeli joint state, that cause more problems.

Although I suppose you could federalise it.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,482
The realistic option I see is putting UN troops on the ground, this is literally what the UN was created for
The armed UN forces are lightly armed and are only allowed to use their weapons in self-defence. It's literally NOT what the UN was created for.

And considering the UK, Europe & the US have the UN sewn up, it ain't happening.

It doesn't matter if the option is "realistic". The only realistic option for the Palestinians is continued utter horror, death or exile - and a gleeful terrorist state chock-full of a 'master race' the majority of whom would love that outcome dearly. Should we just go with that because it's realistic?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom