Politics 2024/25 General Election Voting Intention (2022)

Who do you currently intend to vote for in the next UK general election?

  • Conservatives

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Labour

    Votes: 14 60.9%
  • SNP

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 3 13.0%
  • DUP

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • SDLP

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Green

    Votes: 3 13.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 1 4.3%

  • Total voters
    23

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,123
I picked China because it's the obvious one. But pick a country.

I know people will choose the cheapest thing, rather than ethically buy - which is why we should regulate. That's the whole point of governments.

Not in a capitalist democracy it's the duty to get the cheapest shit possible, and be the furthest away from the bottom of the capitalist pyramid as possible.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,123
It's Labour's version of gerrymandering.

So many reform votes though, maybe that's the point, split the vote.

As for gerrymandering, play the game so long as its allowed. Atleast we're not the US!
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,489
As for gerrymandering, play the game so long as its allowed. Atleast we're not the US!
Principles, dear boy.

If Starmer shows no adherence to principles then it shows that if he was in the US he'd do exactly the same.

Which brings me on to my next post, and the principles that Labour have absolutley abandoned...
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,489
Gawd damn this is why I hate Labour - their wholesale adoption of Orwellian Newspeak:


Now, I hate Diane Abbot as much as the next guy. But saying that racism that people of colour experience because everyone can see they're people of colour, and racism that white people experience when they're members of a minority - e.g. travellers or jewish people - are different experiences is just plain true.

Labour are calling her antisemitic for pointing out this truth.

This is wholesale mind-capture and the use of language as a cage to make thought-crime impossible.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,489
1753295916589.png

I mean, I might get this printed on a t-shirt and see how many people try to start fights with me :)
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,489
Big miscarriage of justice this, posted about it a fair few times:

What really needs to happen is that the government and banking heads who knowingly were doing this need to go to jail. From the PM, to the BoE head and on down. They threw these guys to the wall.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,123

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,489
So the article says:
Sir Keir said recognition of a Palestinian state had to be part of a "wider plan which ultimately results in a two-state solution"

Which really means:
Sir Keir, a committed zionist who's children are being brought up jewish, who said Israel has the right to collectively punish all Palestinians by witholding power and water, regurgitated the "two-state solution" lie to placate the idiot mind-captured western populace

There is no two state solution. Peace and zionism are not compatible. This ends with either zionism dead (lol) or the palestinians dead, exiled or in an utterly battered fifth-class citizens in an open prison camp.

Israel is a disgusting zionist piece of shit that needs 'wiping off the map', and replacing with a secular state. Preferably with a different name that isn't so emotive.
 

BloodOmen

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
18,366
That dark humoured part of me is like... "fuck it, vote reform next election" because I want to see farage get fucked when he has power and not know how to use it.

I sure as hell won't be voting Conservative Light or Conservative anymore thats for sure, useless twats

At this point its either abstain from voting, vote green (lol no chance of them ever getting anywhere because their plans cost too much to put into place) or vote reform for a dark humoured chuckle
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,123
So the article says:


Which really means:


There is no two state solution. Peace and zionism are not compatible. This ends with either zionism dead (lol) or the palestinians dead, exiled or in an utterly battered fifth-class citizens in an open prison camp.

Israel is a disgusting zionist piece of shit that needs 'wiping off the map', and replacing with a secular state. Preferably with a different name that isn't so emotive.

That's hardly a realistic option.

The realistic option I see is putting UN troops on the ground, this is literally what the UN was created for, and they need to be there long term.

I don't think you'd be able to create a single Palestinian and Israeli joint state, that cause more problems.

Although I suppose you could federalise it.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,489
The realistic option I see is putting UN troops on the ground, this is literally what the UN was created for
The armed UN forces are lightly armed and are only allowed to use their weapons in self-defence. It's literally NOT what the UN was created for.

And considering the UK, Europe & the US have the UN sewn up, it ain't happening.

It doesn't matter if the option is "realistic". The only realistic option for the Palestinians is continued utter horror, death or exile - and a gleeful terrorist state chock-full of a 'master race' the majority of whom would love that outcome dearly. Should we just go with that because it's realistic?
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,489

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,123
Once you hit 65 you shouldn't be able to vote and you should pay for the NHS.

There was a thing a coupe of weeks ago, I dunno if it was MPs or the government that basically said people who retire 2040+ you're fucked. Oh well.
 

Deebs

Chief Arsewipe
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 11, 1997
Messages
9,077,169
Once you hit 65 you shouldn't be able to vote and you should pay for the NHS.

There was a thing a coupe of weeks ago, I dunno if it was MPs or the government that basically said people who retire 2040+ you're fucked. Oh well.
Um why should I pay for the NHS at 65 when I have been paying for the NHS all my life?
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,123
I wasn't being serious, but I'm serious that something radical needs to happen, we can't ignore the demographic time bomb, especially when you've got people that are doing alright getting government handouts.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,489
As predicted, here we go:


Despite out average lifespans falling for over a decade now the state pension age is going to go up and up.

Edit: And women have less in their pension pot because they don't fucking save. They don't talk about pensions and saving like men do, and they don't try to learn about it.

Men are pretty shit, but women are truly awful about it. Even those earning much in excess of the national average wage.
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
45,234
Only a complete idiot would not have a private pension.

But, Your home is your pension has been pushed for decades.
 

Ormorof

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,923
Im skeptical anyone currently under 40 will ever get to retire, we will work until we drop
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,489
Only 58% of us are actively contributing into a private pension. 75% have one. But the amounts are utterly inadequate.

Employees think putting in 4% is enough but really ~15% of you start at 20 is the thing. But nobody drums that home.
Your home is your pension has been pushed for decades.
Hasn't been "pushed". That's just been a popular excuse for not saving.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,489
Im skeptical anyone currently under 40 will ever get to retire, we will work until we drop
Raise the age up on that tbh.

The public sector pensions are fucking cushy though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Top Bottom