I'm no fan of musk. but comparing him to Putin or a paedophile?Yes, and that's completely their right to do so. They didn't invite Putin or paedophiles either. You could also argue Musk has done more harm to the world than Israel has.
I've killed 40,000+ prisoner Palestinians, bombed their schools and hospitals and am now bombing Lebanon risking wider middle eastern war, because my government is inherently racist.The argument is simple; time and again you've downplayed the role of social media in the world, and your inability to comprehend that means you don't see the danger that Musk creates.
The modus operandi of Musk is 'because I can'.
I can make us all pay for stuff on the internet.
I can revolutionise the car market.
I can revolutionise the space industry.
I can revolutionise politics, not bothered how, so long as I can.
BTW - I don't think musk gives a fuck. He doesn't need the cash, and since France are inviting him to their investment junket instead I bet he'll be happy to invest there.
It's not like blighty needs the fucking investment eh?
I have said I think he's a cunt.Scouse agrees with him and now therefore supports him.
I have said I think he's a cunt.
You've equated him with a paedo, an invader and a war criminal.
So, not only am I not a "supporter" of Musk - you're showing yourselves up to be delusional.
My beef is with Labour for being blinkered asshats and people who are more concerned with "bad words" than they are genocide'
What has he done that's so bad you're equating him with paedos and murderers.'bad words'.
You're not even trying to understand.
What has he done that's so bad you're equating him with paedos and murderers.
I'm not understanding because you're not making an effort to explain yourself.
Actually I am.you're not really bothered about paedos being released from prison
Never said it was. None of the social media apps are. They're designed as money gougers and to do that they have to drive engagement, nothing more.Twitter is not some haven of free speech, never has been.
It kinda highlights the problem of the two party system, in reality there's probably a spectrum of 4-5 parties in there
If she fundamentally disagrees with the party she campaigns for she should not be in it
Not defending Starmer here the whole gift thing is a spectacular own goal that anyone with half a brain should have flagged as not ok, a sign perhaps he has too many people eager to please and not enough candid folks around him
Stalin sacked all of those people when he purged the left from the party. Labour isn't welcoming to dissenting voices.Not defending Starmer here the whole gift thing is a spectacular own goal that anyone with half a brain should have flagged as not ok, a sign perhaps he has too many people eager to please and not enough candid folks around him
Yes the conservatives would never.Stalin sacked all of those people when he purged the left from the party. Labour isn't welcoming to dissenting voices.
Question of scale @ECA.Yes the conservatives would never.
2019 suspension of rebel Conservative MPs - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Or stop public servants from accepting donations.Nothing gets poor people more riled up than rich people getting free stuff. 10/10 entertainment for such a non-issue. 🍿
It's valid when they're spending public money on it, but c'mon.. Their corporate sponsors alone pay them in gold.
Either declare everything or stop bitching about it. It'll never stop.
Or stop public servants from accepting donations.
I can't take a single thing because I work for the bank because of the regulations brought in after the financial crash to stop this sort of conflict of interest stuff. Politicians should be first on that line.
Tickets from Arsenal? Obvious conflict of interest with the government setting up a football regulator.