it's undoubtledly going to be a beautiful screen but for me gaming wise I'm going to leave 60Hz behind me. such a shame because my current monitor is lovely in all other respects.
Its a waaaaay off for gaming. The brute force just isn't there, even with crazy set ups.
I may have read (without the usual, omg where are your ketchups?!? and so on) that the human eye can only see in ~16k
But @Big G "good times" for gaming incoming over the next 10 years or so, so long as we don't all catch Brexit and die... or pretend to game on consoles.
Besides which if its not 16k @60fps it can get in the sea.
Shame the relative power in GPU/CPU isn't on par with those crazy monitors. Unless there's a bottleneck with the DirectX interface in relation to how games are programmed and how the graphic-cards work. A large leap would be nice, instead of the standard 20-25% shift with prices that in my opinion really isn't warranted.
That isn't bad for the alleged performance gains.
The 1080 was an absolutely dreadful card for perf/£ , with my 1070 amp extreme getting equivalent performance.
If the average gain is around 35-40%, then it will put a lot of titles that were close to 4k60 over the finish line, and price being 60-65% higher than a 1070 for 45-50% perf gains isn't too bad for the flagship.
Let's hope vega magically is better for half the money?
Considering upgrading but tbh I'm not sure I even need to for another 2-3 year at least.
Currently running
4690k @ 4.0ghz
16gig DDR3
GTX 1070
nothing really chugs, some CPU intensive games chug sort of... but nothing ground breaking, might just wait until the next round of releases after Coffeelake and see how it goes.
Heh, so not only did they release the current tier top end cards within the predicted timescale but we are ~6 months away from the next gen (apparently)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.