Porkbelly
Loyal Freddie
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
- Messages
- 243
Bondoila said:Most retarded change ever no dmg in fz will mean you can't stay speced as melee ranger anymore(need to use bow on dist) and then it also means rangers will once again be canonfodder for assasin..... Even if you spec up bow high the fucking assasins will just vanish if your trying to use dist and on that dist you can't find them without mos5+sl.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Wpn skill debuff(instead of s/c), lw nerf(heaters) and now this....
Time to give archers warlord, since now both soj and bm will be shit.
Bondoila said:Most retarded change ever no dmg in fz will mean you can't stay speced as melee ranger anymore(need to use bow on dist) and then it also means rangers will once again be canonfodder for assasin..... Even if you spec up bow high the fucking assasins will just vanish if your trying to use dist and on that dist you can't find them without mos5+sl.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Wpn skill debuff(instead of s/c), lw nerf(heaters) and now this....
Time to give archers warlord, since now both soj and bm will be shit.
liloe said:If you base speccing melee as ranger on a 15min timered ML, something is wrong though, I think you have to agree on that =)
I think it's simply wrong that mids get the sidestun aswell though. Zerkers generally already deal more dmg than BM's, so why give them the nice styles on top of this? I'm asking for more style bonus in the CD line then please =)
MaditioN said:roflcopter.
zerkers doing more dmg than bm´s?
maybe in vendo+bs, but after those seconds are over bm´s styles outmatches zerkers imo.
MaditioN said:roflcopter.
zerkers doing more dmg than bm´s?
maybe in vendo+bs, but after those seconds are over bm´s styles outmatches zerkers imo.
Puppet said:Snowsquall-style on a berserker is higher DPS then anything a BM can pull off.
Those stuns + Vendo was a bad idea.
pikeh said:fuck. yeh.
good thing of course for me, but must be terrible for any bow specced rangers out there :<
but surely still with ip, and pd rangers can still take apart scouts and hunters?
Believe me, they don't.liloe said:I think it's simply wrong that mids get the sidestun aswell though. Zerkers generally already deal more dmg than BM's, so why give them the nice styles on top of this?
Cloudz said:just need a merc side style stun or something now
You'd be cannonfodder anyway if you'd have to rely on fz xDBondoila said:Most retarded change ever no dmg in fz will mean you can't stay speced as melee ranger anymore(need to use bow on dist) and then it also means rangers will once again be canonfodder for assasin..... Even if you spec up bow high the fucking assasins will just vanish if your trying to use dist and on that dist you can't find them without mos5+sl.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Wpn skill debuff(instead of s/c), lw nerf(heaters) and now this....
Time to give archers warlord, since now both soj and bm will be shit.
And mercs :< Where's my stun/snare :<Congax said:Correct. BM damage output could only be achieved with side-style stun tbh, now zerkers getting this stun aswell means BM's will get pooned
But bow's better for leeching/zerging, surely that'd be a good thing in your case?pip said:If we forced to go bow should have true sight again
Straef said:And mercs :< Where's my stun/snare :<
Any time stun? side snare? oh u have that alreadyStraef said:And mercs :< Where's my stun/snare?
I'm not whining, I just wouldn't mind some sort of snare ;pCongax said:All this merc whine makes me giggle
Aye, because crush is roxxxxxxxxx, really! And gj trying to get side style off when a target is sprinting away from you. Hardly as easy as spamming behind style :dValgyr said:Any time stun? side snare? oh u have that already
Straef said:I'm not whining, I just wouldn't mind some sort of snare ;p