And of course the last one wasn't anything to do with Islamic extremists was it oooo no . Germany is under attack it seems, a problem of it's own making.
Think that shows the media hysteria of terrorism from Islam.
That story on 19 disabled people being killed has been moved out of the headlines in favour of 1 84 year old priest. I'm not lessening the severity of it but if Muslims are involved the chances of it dominating the headlines increases by 100%.
its a bit like on the same day of the Nice attack, 84 (iirc) Iraqis were bombed by the Americans - oh shit, sorry.
Thing is, you're looking at it from a world perspective. Most people look at situations from a (fairly) local situation. Therefore, murders in France are much more relevant than murders in Iraq.Think that shows the media hysteria of terrorism from Islam.
That story on 19 disabled people being killed has been moved out of the headlines in favour of 1 84 year old priest. I'm not lessening the severity of it but if Muslims are involved the chances of it dominating the headlines increases by 100%.
its a bit like on the same day of the Nice attack, 84 (iirc) Iraqis were bombed by the Americans - oh shit, sorry.
Think that shows the media hysteria of terrorism from Islam.
That story on 19 disabled people being killed has been moved out of the headlines in favour of 1 84 year old priest. I'm not lessening the severity of it but if Muslims are involved the chances of it dominating the headlines increases by 100%.
its a bit like on the same day of the Nice attack, 84 (iirc) Iraqis were bombed by the Americans - oh shit, sorry.
50+ died in a suicide attack in kabul this week, havn't heard about it on the news at all.
Dailytimes | 80 dead as IS claims deadliest attack in Kabul
It's proximity, not bias.
At what numbers does it become more important? 20,000 pollution deaths per annum, for example?One unrelated and individual attack, while tragic is not of as much importance as yet another snackbar attack
Agree. But that's only because we're stupid stupid monkeys.Most people look at situations from a (fairly) local situation
At what numbers does it become more important? 20,000 pollution deaths per annum, for example?
The rush to "OMG terrorizm" is an emotional reaction. It's not what we should be focussing on at all.
Agree. But that's only because we're stupid stupid monkeys.
We can do better, given the right level of education and training in risk and a more global outlook that's interested in the survival and betterment of the human race rather than parochial local or emotional concerns.
Same thing. Limited thinking.Either we're stupid monkeys, or we just want to look after our own. One or the other ..
You mean, we're not all homo sapiens? Wow!The idea that we are all one species and therefore can think the same and agree with each other is probably the dumbest thing of all.
You said we're not all the same species. But we are.lol stop being a mentalist it's far more extreme than that me little ideological scouse chum.
Therefore, murders in France are much more relevant than murders in Iraq.
Does empathy have a distance limit?But I'm NOT an Iraqi am I silly bollock, and nor is anyone else in England ??
Basically - I want you to explain/give logical and rational, rather than base emotive, reasoning for your opinion on this Throdlar.murders in France are much more relevant than murders in Iraq.