I'll asnwer like you: But for some reason, people want to keep believing.
It's as simple as that. Taking away funding, getting rich, being more educated, these would have zero effect on people believing in god/gods, doing what they do and so forth. General attitude is bad towards a lot of things, but still they haven't died out. ALOT worse things then religion is coming from technology, industry, money, greed, and have what you will.
You can take my examples, and "explain" how their not that bad, but it doesn't moot the point. There can always happen bad things, from anything. I bet if we took some things you like to do, we could say all the bad stuff that happens from it. Drive a car? Smoke? Drink? Eat meat? Don't grow your own food? The fact of the matter is, that simply because you don't believe, and because some people do bad things in the name of religion, isn't a valid reason to kill all religion completely.
And still waiting on any other way to "kill religion", then with concentration camps and gas chambers.
Porn and Child porn are not linked in any way. Whether theres porn or not has no effect on the amount of child porn. I dont think there would be any bad results from banning alcohol. But for some reason people want to keep drinking it. (As do i -,-). Condoms save millions of lives every year so those few deaths arent enough to make them a bad thing.
The chance of it happening is enough of a reason to ban religion because it has very few positive effects on society. And some fundamentalist revolution in Europe is not my main concern here. If there is a god then someone will ALWAYS take it to the next level. For example, trying to prevent africans from using condoms. Aslong as there is a god these things will happen.
When people are rich and educated religions die on their own if they are not supported financially and if the general attitude towards them is not positive.
how the fuck does legal porn spawn peadophilia exactly?
1: Religion is slowly dying Europe. Why? We're rich, we're educated and the general attitude is turning against it.
2: Cars are necessary even if they do kill people. Smoking is the same as alcohol. Meat? Well it might have its share in heart diseases but its not the main reason. Dont understand the growing your own food thing... -,-
3: Religion gives nothing but false hope, yet it kills millions of people a year. Ofcourse thats a valid reason to destroy it.
4: Like Marx said. Religion is the opium of the people (or something like that, feel free to correct me smartasses). We so desperately want to hold on to it even though its only making us miserable. Just like a drug.
1: Religion is dying only in the mind of the people who are opposed to it. Again, money and anti-religion people are not the cause for a very doubtful religions demise. Again, how do you suppose we rid of religion since you so want to? Even if there were no churches, huge anti-semantics against it and all that, people would still believe. They have for ages, they will continue to do so. So what do you suggest?
Religious beliefs are directly linked to peoples level of education, Europe suffers less from religion because we are more educated apparently and more able and willing to question belief systems, education is in turn linked to wealth.
Religion will fade away over time, is my guess, I think the majority of people who hang onto religion do so because they have a hard time dealing with the finality of death, as soon as you replace death with something more appealing (as religions do) then people will by in to it, its the common denominator when it comes to all religions and cults.
Have to ask what you mean from "suffers less"? Suffers less from extremists i reckon? Because religion is very strong in europe, as it's always been, just it's more versatile and not so strict. It's not dying, or less alive, then in the US as an example, people just don't chant it on the streets and in your face as much.
Religion is stronger now, and more versatile aswell, then it was many many years ago, so i'd say the amount of religion, or people believing, is inclining and not declining.
Suffers less as in we don't have to hear about it, it's not the driving force behind europe.
Not from what I have seen, from where are you getting information to suggest religion is on the up and up in the EU?
So the "harm" is that people who are not religious, have to sometimes see/hear something religious?
Is that really "harming" europe?
But in no way can one say it's dying either.
Yes, religion is as far I can see one of the huge sticking points when it comes to social integration. People talk about racism but I think we have a culturalism problem and it;s just called racism out of habbit, when religion is the driving force behind a culture the upshot is problems and as we know, many cultures are driven by religion, so when we see race riots for example what we actually see is culture riots.
The less religion the less differences and the fewer sticking points we will have, another problem is that decisions made by people in positions of authority can be biased by their religions or as not offend someone else's, so what should be a common sense logical and impartial decision can very well be skewed by religion.
Many churches report falling attendances, that's hardly a sign of growth. and the new age religions cults etc get credit from no one so I doubt they will do so well for themselves in the long term.
So, do correct me if i'm wrong, but you want to eliminate discrimination via means of total conformation? Doesn't that seem at all contradictive to you?
Exactly what I said, christianity/church/god/bible may be going down a aibt(not much that either), but religion isn't just churches and such.
I think people would get on better if their "Beliefs didn't get in the way" that's pretty much what I meant. But you will insist on spinning.
I used that as example because it close to home and more widely talked about, and like I have said I have seen nothing whatsoever to suggest that religion is on the rise. I'm not going to agree that its not so lets just not bother eh.
I used that as example because it close to home and more widely talked about, and like I have said I have seen nothing whatsoever to suggest that religion is on the rise. I'm not going to agree that its not so lets just not bother eh.
I'm not spinning, i said, correct me if i'm wrong, as your post seemed like "no religion, no problem", as in, remove peoples individuality and remove differences. That's what it sounded like, what you wrote next "religion shouldn't get in the way" sounds completely different.
Wasn't that the point in your original? Remove religion, remove more of our differences?
Sure, beliefs shouldn't get in the way, but they shouldn't be used against people either then. So, as an example; tom Cruise, actor, people would probably use his religion against him in some choices. Yet, these same people say that people shouldn't use religion as a basis for their decisions. Hypocritical i'd say.
By the way, don't start with that "you're just doing the same thing" cop-out. People seem to have a problem in taking posts as personal attacks all the time and backstabbing, instead of discussing and trying to get other peoples points. I'm asking things to understand more, to get the point.
So you're not saying it is nto our place to say it's rising or declining? Good, that we can agree on, as one might need more then google to find that out with some "evidence". Opinions ofcourse are just those.
Suprising by the way, when i want something explained more or understand it wrong, it's spinning, yet when, as an example, tris- thinks i meant legal porn makes paedos, it's just me being me again.
People can explain all day long to you and you will just manoeuvre you way into another argument, you asking for "clarification" and "explanation" is your favoured method of manoeuvre. It seems that the more people engage you the more difficult you become and I like simply cannot be bothered to explain myself in detail over and over and to clarify every single point and meaning I wanted to make. A debate over religion with a believer in Norse gods just is not high up on my priority list have more important things to do.
People can explain all day long to you and you will just manoeuvre you way into another argument, you asking for "clarification" and "explanation" is your favoured method of manoeuvre. It seems that the more people engage you the more difficult you become and I like simply cannot be bothered to explain myself in detail over and over and to clarify every single point and meaning I wanted to make. A debate over religion with a believer in Norse gods just is not high up on my priority list have more important things to do.
Religious beliefs are directly linked to peoples level of education, Europe suffers less from religion because we are more educated apparently and more able and willing to question belief systems, education is in turn linked to wealth.
Ah, for the day when we just threw the bible thumpers into a stone arena filled with lions and tigers.
Least the animals were well fed. Whiskers christian, now with 10% more piety.
How far from your pram did the teddy land?
Weren't you the one who fantasised about me phlegming on my monitor? You need to expand your repertoire a little, the whole "They must be having a tantrum/fit angle doesn't work well for you, but then I cant imagine that much would work for you.
You fail, delete yourself and roll a new character.
I'll give you something to think then.
Jews are among the really rich people and very educated aswell. Still, they are religious. Strange, isn't it?
In ancient Egypt, religion was predominant in every aspect of life, still they achieved great things which impress us even nowadays. They were also very rich and influenced a huge part of their known world.
Take the Celts, the Chinese, the Maye and you will find great intelligence and wealth, but also great faith, so your argument is kinda moot.
Toht is absolutely right when he sais that your arguments are repetitive, because every time someone asks why religion is so bad, you just give some extremists as example.
You know, politicians do the same with "computer games that create killers" and yet I bet you'd say they're all wrong and are just making generalisations.
So let me ask you: What would you tell someone who wants to forbid computer games all together? They have no use at all except a little bit of fun, but honestly, you can survive without. They're also at the base of aggressions from young children and as such very dangerous for society.
Omg ban, he wants me to die IRL…
I haven't given any extremist examples. Part of the frustration debating with Tho is that if you don't spell out every meaning of something he will dig into it in the best way he can to support his argument.........you bought into i never mention extremism, so you tell me what extremist points was I using?
Like i said, people have a problem with taking everything as an assault or a sinister plot to destroy their epeen.
Some people just don't have the time to keep clarifying, You know how I feel about religion and I don't feel I need to (in this arena at lest) spent an age justifying my feelings again and again. We have been over it countless times, can you remember that last time I asked you to clarify your beliefs or to justify them? We have done it before I don't need to keep asking, I can understand going over the same ground for the benefit of people who have not engaged in this topic here before but you don't qualify we talked the same talk last year on more than a few occasions and probably the year before that too.
This statement is just to ease the burden from the parents, if parents just took their time with their kids, the kids would not become agressive and stuff.They're also at the base of aggressions from young children and as such very dangerous for society.
Ah, for the day when we just threw the bible thumpers into a stone arena filled with lions and tigers.
Least the animals were well fed. Whiskers christian, now with 10% more piety.
No offence dude, but this post shows how clueless you are.