What class to play? D:

Redemption

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 17, 2004
Messages
2
Lo all, I have been away from DaoC for about 5 months now and have no idea as to what type of class to play, I know I want something that can play an active role in a group and won't have any problems finding a group that would need me, so I am thinking a fighter class, at first I thought savage but I hear they got nerfed pretty badly while I've been away, some people have said Zerkers are better than Savages again but I'm at a total loss D:

Anything that can hold their own in RvR would be good also :)

Any suggestions appreciated :D
 

plastic

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
215
I would go for a healer though, they will most likely always be needed in a decent RvR group
 

Redemption

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 17, 2004
Messages
2
I've narrowed it down to either a Skald or a Savage, not sure on what race or how to spend attribute points for either though :(

A spec would come in handy too, any suggestions/tips? :)

Thanks in advance!
 

Ghostfeet

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
487
Phixion said:
says the Merc
lol yes, the useless saracen thrust, compared to HO crush, noob.
or the pala that ive played for soon 2 y, way before end chant, o yes, i allways roll the overpowered wtfpwn class.

/sarcasm is on, if u havnt noticed.

and for the record, lol, he actually gonna play/thinking of playing a savage :kissit:
 

Kami

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,254
We dont have enough 50 Bonedancers in midgard, also seem to be seeing a lack of actually PLAYED shaman (yes you can play them - not just bots) around these days ;)
 

Bloodclot

Banned
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
692
if you gonna choose savage:

if you gonna solo alot and don't have a buffbot.. don't bother

solo zerker without bb in pve >>>>>>>>>>> solo savage without bb in pve
savage with bb in pve > zerker

zerker in groups = savage in groups imo
 

harebear

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 29, 2003
Messages
2,647
skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald skald

44hammer 46bs 17parry 44hammer 46bs 17parry 44hammer 46bs 17parry

:wub: :wub:
 

cougar

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
28
savage population is about half the amount of healers/skalds. so no, all mids dont play savage
 

Ghostfeet

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
487
cougar said:
savage population is about half the amount of healers/skalds. so no, all mids dont play savage
do u even know what sarcasm is? no? didnt think so.
 

Eater of Kobolds

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
10
Mid has way too many skalds tbh, every time I get to mpk and try finding a group there's ALWAYS 2-3 other skalds lfg as well. I'd say a played shaman or maybe a warrior, shouldn't have much problem getting groups with any of those.
 

harebear

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 29, 2003
Messages
2,647
my warrior didnt get groups sooo easy, if you want really easy groups then get shammy/healer :p
 

anubis

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
605
Ghostfeet said:
savage ofc .

thought all mids played savages? no?
thought all albs are sad f**ks? no?

ps. you'd better f**k off to alb boards, you seem to spam here more than there
 

Klonk

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
790
If you want a tank, go for a warrior or a skald imo. Warriors have always owned ( :p ) and they will get much better with TOA (bodyguard ability etc). The skald is nice too, tho, and is almost always needed for rvr grps (apart from the really fotm mid grps wtih extra tank instead of skald - which I personally think suck).

If you are thinking of support - both healer and shammy are fun to play imo. And btw, don't rule out casters. With TOA inc with + to cast speed, many guilds are leveling / dusting off casters again :)
 

Ghostfeet

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
487
old.anubis said:
thought all albs are sad f**ks? no?

ps. you'd better f**k off to alb boards, you seem to spam here more than there
ahh i c u just hit puberty?
 

mts

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 25, 2003
Messages
742
Ghostfeet said:
ahh i c u just hit puberty?
You realize you haven't contributed anything to this thread at all? That makes you a troll.

Have a nice day.

To the thread starter:

Skald, savage, berserker and warrior are all good choices for a fotm rvr group these days imho.
 

Ghostfeet

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
487
mts said:
You realize you haven't contributed anything to this thread at all? That makes you a troll.

Have a nice day.

To the thread starter:

Skald, savage, berserker and warrior are all good choices for a fotm rvr group these days imho.
no actually im a saracen. or briton. never liked trolls :p

and my intetion wasnt to contribute anything. just to prove my point that all there is to mid rvr is savages. not seen 1 "good" mid tank grp with zerkers/warriors after LA nerf. NP used em, JH, Blizzard, every single mid guild rerolled. thats my point.

have a nice day.
 

mts

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 25, 2003
Messages
742
Ghostfeet said:
no actually im a saracen. or briton. never liked trolls :p

and my intetion wasnt to contribute anything. just to prove my point that all there is to mid rvr is savages. not seen 1 "good" mid tank grp with zerkers/warriors after LA nerf. NP used em, JH, Blizzard, every single mid guild rerolled. thats my point.

have a nice day.
Well if you had said all that to start with I wouldn't have been coming here pointing fingers. Thing is, zerkers are still viable for a good rvr-tank group, it's just that savages need more attention from the healers now since their self-buffs eat alot of health. So they work different really. I'd take 3 zerks over 3 savs any day, but then again I'm oldschool. :p
 

Ghostfeet

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
487
mts said:
Well if you had said all that to start with I wouldn't have been coming here pointing fingers. Thing is, zerkers are still viable for a good rvr-tank group, it's just that savages need more attention from the healers now since their self-buffs eat alot of health. So they work different really. I'd take 3 zerks over 3 savs any day, but then again I'm oldschool. :p
Hehe :) tbh the few times we played vs zerk, if played proper ( not just savage f8 spamming ) zerks r just as viable. but thats the thing aint it, savages r the infils of fg vs fg rvr :) theres something for u to relate to.
 

anubis

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
605
Ghostfeet said:
no actually im a saracen. or briton. never liked trolls :p

and my intetion wasnt to contribute anything. just to prove my point that all there is to mid rvr is savages. not seen 1 "good" mid tank grp with zerkers/warriors after LA nerf. NP used em, JH, Blizzard, every single mid guild rerolled. thats my point.

have a nice day.
you dont know sh1t about midgard groups
so move along, brag on hib forums or smth
maybe you know smth from there, but i doubt it since you look like very dumb person
 

Nait

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
44
Can there be 1 thread without whine or albs and mids moaning about fotm and shit !!!! :puke:

Roll a Mend/Pac healer imo.....i have 1 and i always get a grp.
 

Himse

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 31, 2004
Messages
2,178
We dont have enough 50 Bonedancers in midgard, also seem to be seeing a lack of actually PLAYED shaman (yes you can play them - not just bots) around these days
Well My Cave / Aug Shammy just got to 50 and is NOT A BUFF BOT :)
Should be more like that, shammys now are buffbots and thats it :/
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom