Werewolf Game Thread (4.0)

[Ch3tan]

Ch3t and Toht throwing their votes around as usual. Ch3t you and Rubric the one in the limelight here mate, Sydrik didn't like you and now he's gone. Sorry I haven't posted much in this game, it's a bit of a busy time this year for me.

Also, syd didn't like me? Or rubric? I've failed to find anything that would indicate either. Lying wolf, bad boy, die! Really poor attempt to lead the vote by trying to indicate the wolves target had issue with me.

 

[itcheh]

Not at all what i'm saying, i'm saying i'm voting for you based on how my vote on cerb prompted you to jump on the bandwagon for two reasons;

A: To distance from the just set new "bandwagon".
B: To make sure you've got an out if novote was put under pressure, since you said "grudgingly placing vote".

Now you're saying that it was just the right thing to do, and not a grudgingly placed vote, makes it even mroe suspicious.

First: the world does not revolve around you ... my vote was in no way influenced by what you or anyone else is doing. In fact it's more influenced by what the majority of people are NOT doing right now.
Second: yes, a no-vote was the right thing to do since I did not have any strong feelings towards anyone in particular ... and I was not about to start voting to kill people (unlike you)
Third: yes, it was grudglingly, because it feels helpless to do nothing while the predators pick us off one by one ... but as stated above it's the right thing to do

So that's all I have to say on the matter. You seem insistent on shit-stirring ... and I cannot be arsed with your wildly inaccurate and spurious finger pointing.

 

[Uara]

Okay, seems like everyone has come round from some drunken/food induced stupor that had hit the town

Also, syd didn't like me? Or rubric? I've failed to find anything that would indicate either.

I agree with this, the only thing that was said by Sydrik that could potentially lead to the conclusion that he didn't like certain people was this:-

I cant decide if Rubric is being a complete idiot or if Ch3t is trying to lead us into a vote...

What I see from that is just some worry that he's not quite sure what is going on between Chet and Rubric, not an outright declaration that something dodgy is going down from either of them. OR that he doesn't appear to like them.

Toht-i'm not quite sure what you're trying to do with regard to Itcheh. Yes he had a no vote yesterday but most people would considering it a safer option than just having a random stab in the dark at their next door neighbour because he looked a bit funny. (looking at you here Cerb ) If there are no strong inclinations towards a particular person, you're not forced to vote for them. Itch did try to explain himself when Chet asked and I can understand his point about grudgingly, no one likes not being able to do something productive if they're trying to save the town.

Actually talking of Cerb...there has been no sign of him yet today.

 

[old.Tohtori]

my vote was in no way influenced by what you or anyone else is doing.

Well that's just stupid and dangerous.

 

[Olgaline]

Well that's just stupid and dangerous.

why?

He clearly stated that he did not have any suspect
or reasonable dout to justify voting for someone, and thus
opted to vote for a no lynch. makes perfect sence to me.

Now you can agree with him or disagree all you like,
Butik there is nothing odd, stupid or dangerous about it.

 

[old.Tohtori]

Read the quote too. Not basing your vote on other peoples actions is just playing your own game(stupid when we need to work as a team), voting on whims and that's just dangerous.

 

[itcheh]

Read the quote too. Not basing your vote on other peoples actions is just playing your own game(stupid when we need to work as a team), voting on whims and that's just dangerous.

On day 1 with no information ... just how am I meant to vote? Let's kill a random and feel better about myself? Is that being a team player?

You seem to think I'm guilty for voting (allegedly) based on your vote for Cerb

You then accuse me of being dangerous for NOT basing my vote on what you (or others) did

Finally, you accuse me of being stupid and dangerous for not being a team player ... this after you have INDIVIDUALLY voted to kill Cerb on day one and me on day 2 ... how are your actions that of a team player? How is your voting more intelligent than mine?

You are being very strange

 

[old.Tohtori]

You seem to think I'm guilty for voting (allegedly) based on your vote for Cerb

You then accuse me of being dangerous for NOT basing my vote on what you (or others) did
Finally, you accuse me of being stupid and dangerous for not being a team player ...

I stated why i found your fast novote after my vote was suspicious.
I stated it's dangerous after you said you're not basing your votes on other peoples actions.

Those two are not connected.

Finally, i accused you for acting stupid and dangerous for not basing your votes on what's happening, not because you're not a teamplayer.
I said you're not a teaamplayer if you vote based on your own whims.

Let's not put words in mouths.

 

[old.Tohtori]

Unvote: itcheh

Thanks for the info and with all said and done, my final vote goes for;

Vote: nate

Random pop in to point a couple of fingers, no real contributions, using meta to "justify" said fingerpointing and yet no voting from him(making others do his work).

 

[Cerb]

*many apologies for being inactive for a few days. Damn Holiday and family.*

I shall review what has been said and try to come to a conclusion!

 

[Rubric]

*what's Tue vote count*

I am leaning towards nate as there does seem an argument for it. And its the only ine really being presented.

 

[Mabs]

OoOoOo
Nate - 2

12- 2= 10 -> 6 for majority

im on laptop atm and not at home, will be keeping tabs on it, so wont be as fast to respond/check

OoOoOo

 

[itcheh]

So far there's been very little chat from the majority of folks due too the winter festival.

On that basis I'm going for a no vote for now.

Vote: no lynch

 

[Ch3tan]

Not nate then despite his lies?

 

[Ch3tan]

*pisses into the wind*

 

[Rubric]

vote: nate. Lack of response and to hopefully get things moving again.

 

[Uara]

*bloody technical issues-having to resort to the original XF style*
Anyhooo now I can participate in this town meeting again-from looking at what has been happening I'm mighty tempted by Nate due to his quietness (although there has been a lot fo that) and other issues that have already been raised by others. However I would like to see him make some responses first before I put a vote down.

 

[Olgaline]

The votes going for Nate atm are vague at best,
but I'm confidant it will teach us something about those doing the voting.

 

[Ch3tan]

Vague? I went for someone who contributed nothing but one throw away comment before the day proper started. I did this to get some life out of him; what he provided as a response was shocking. It was me digging, and it seems I hit gold.

So someone who lies in their defence and tries to create a situation that did not exist is okay in your eyes? Burn him and we'll see if I am wrong, I doubt it though. There is NO reason to lie or be caught out like that unless you have something to hide.

 

[Cerb]

Loath as I am to have a "Sum things up" post here (you can put any spin you want on it), I've been inactive for a while (sorry again) and I jus want to air out some thoughts.

The Chet and Rubric 'spat' to me looked like just a regular disagreement with one person accusing another, and that person defending them self. Nothing to see here....except well... If there is a killer among these two then logic dictates that that killer would not go after the person on the other side of the argument because they would then look very suspicious...so they would go for someone else (sydrick). Also if neither were a killer and it was someone else, the smart thing to do would have been to kill off one and then lead the vote against the other. Because that didn't happen this makes me think that maybe one of Rubric and Chet are a bad guy here.

Then again I could be way off but like I said I'm just thinking out loud. I also haven't the foggiest which I would suspect.

Nate really hasn't said very much.

Nither has Uara for that matter

And me more so for that matter!

Toth and Itch seem to be at each other but neither seems particularly guilty.

I guess what I'm saying is I plan to read over Chet and Rubric's posts and I urge you all to do the same.

 

[Ch3tan]

I'd urge you to as well, and as for Nate has not said very much, his defence of himself on this very day says all you need to know.

 

[Rubric]

*can we get some prods for people.

 

[Calaen]

*sorry for the lack of input on my own behalf, been away to ireland over the chrimbo*

Reading back over, I think Chet has a point about nate. But I'd be blatantly joining a bandwagon if I was to vote for him, atkeast until he tries to defend himself further. Personally I was a little freaked out by will and his percentages. Almost appearing too keen.

So that is where I will stick my vote
vote Will

 

[Rubric]

I have to say that's a wired vote calean.

 

[Ch3tan]

You can hardly call others out on being weird after your replies on day 1.

 

[Rubric]

For which I have explained. I will not repeat myself. I hst can't understand the sway towards will when nate looks so guilty.

 

[Ch3tan]

Probably best you don't repeat yourself, quick way into a noose that.

 

[Calaen]

For which I have explained. I will not repeat myself. I hst can't understand the sway towards will when nate looks so guilty.

Well I've explained my reasoning behond not jumping onto Nate at this moment in time. It doesnt hurt to poke people with a vote to die either my vote isn't final at all.

 

[Mabs]

0o0o0o0o0o
3 nate
1 will
1 no lynch
4 uncast as yet
1 no-post, and has been poked

6 = "majority"
o0o0o0o0oo0

 

[Olgaline]

I've also concidered voting for Will, and I still havent dismissed the thought,
so cals vote dosent really seem all that odd to me.