Who wants coal when solar is less than half the price?
Wont be for long once they start mining it again.
So where are they getting their power from, it sure aint from solar and wind.
Hoover dam is a hydro plant. Its not tidal. Got two massive turbine towers....Not entirely...the problem with hydro and solar is still storage. Hydro is generating all the time* you cannot increase capacity to meet temporary demand, without building more units. All you can do is start shutting them down when not required which is never as renewables don't make up 100% generation. Solar obviously only works when its sunny and again, you cannot just boost generation without building more units. Renewables are mostly an infinite source that have a constant, unchangeable input, we need to learn how best to manage the output.
In the meantime, lets stop fucking about and build more nuclear reactors while we get our heads around the problem with renewables.
*mostly, tidal shit obviously only works when tidal forces are in play, by design.
Hoover dam is a hydro plant. Its not tidal. Got two massive turbine towers.
And in the uk dinorwig hydro plant has a massive lake at the top of a mountain and it emptys it into a lower one for peak demand generation. It can be switched on very fast and cover world cup half time serges for example. It then pumps the water back up when demand is at its lowest and there is sspare capacity in the network.
Depends which style you chooseFH background is green.
How would you go about separating power usage for a specific source?
No, thats why Musk is all over home battery storage, solar and wind can produce GWs on paper and if you X the sun by the panels you get a figure, but less than 10% of that is actually REPLACING conventional, which obviously is pointless if it isnt.Production is all that matters. Job's just being daft, as per...
They are slowly building a Europe wide grid of renewables so we can send power all over when needed, which is probably ultimately a better idea than batteries once you get itworking right, but you will still need huge backup for say, the Euro cup finals.I'm sure it would be possible to monitor unused capacity from renewables, which would give you a usage ratio. In Europe they're trying to minimise wasted capacity by arbitrage (links to shove capacity to different timezones for example). Big-assed capacitors is another option so renewables aren't wasted, but its not a mature technology yet. The other way might be using renewables to crack water for hydrogen.
Hopefully I can't see coal making a comeback in the US. Shale gas is cheap and gas plant is simpler to build. Why would anyone bother especially knowing that those coal plants might get shafted with a heavy carbon tax when the next administration comes in.
Who's going to pay for those jobs?It's got more to do with the supposed creation of jobs in the coal & steel towns, or at least the illusion of an attempt.
Who's going to pay for those jobs?
No one.
Or stop subsidising coal, which it is massively, and suddenly it becomes un-viable again.Coal is viable, you just stop subsidising renewables and loosen the strait jacket on the industry.