Job
The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 21,652
The majority of those involved in tearing down the Edward Colston statue are in a generation that traditionally would struggle to provide the years that either World War 1 or 2 took place thus I've little doubt quite a few of them knew fuck all about Edward Colston or paid little attention to him until they read something about tearing it down, in the end it was little more than a mob justice. I'm not a fan of such statues where there is a heavy weighted history of slavery but neither do I believe looking at one aspect in isolation and then having a mob tear it down is acceptable, it must be done in a proper democratic way. Using the standards set by the mob you easily tear down quite a lot in many different countries from Lloyd's of London to the Pyramids.
I've said before I've a deep dislike of using modern standards/ethics and either transplanting them to the time of the person or vice versa, the ironic thing about it is for all the noise they made and effort they put in it would've been better to redirect that to modern standards/ethics and issues rather than direct them at someone who has been dead for nearly 300 years now.
The argument about the confederate flag, from a person with some knowledge
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dllhGgLXZg&feature=emb_logo
We've already covered the fact that you derive much more comfort from a feeling of national identity from our victor-written history myths than most - which is why you baulk at any change - for people like you, it's something that shakes you to the core.Scouse..history is what cements us as a nation...
We've already covered the fact that you derive much more comfort from a feeling of national identity from our victor-written history myths than most - which is why you baulk at any change - for people like you, it's something that shakes you to the core.
But it's bullshit. A myth and, like Einstein said, Nationalism is an infantile disease.
I'd rather identify with humans today, with what the best of us are struggling towards collectively, than a fantasy of a past I had no help in shaping.
You love Doug. So I'll post it again (as you once did, which is weird as it undermines your own argument):
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gy19YmQHHJU
YeahSeems to be going well.
I'm not saing me you tit - I'm saying we should be celebrating nobel prize winning scientists, medical professionals, humanitarians, politicians and leaders who bring about social good.The best of us? Could you crawl any further up your own ass?
I'd rather feel pride in the human race and what we're doing now than identify with some cunt who sunk ships over 200 years ago.
I actually agree with this bit. Seeing as slavery is the contentious subject du jour, maybe rather than bickering about 200 year old statues and a past we can't really do much about, we should be focusing on modern slavery in Libya, Sub Saharan Africa, the Middle East and China. The UK was fairly prominent in the movement to end slavery in the Western World, maybe we should pick that up again and focus on real problems rather than the past?
It's going to be interesting trying to find anyone we can put statues up of any more. Considering people have already found Ghandi, Mandela, MLK and even Abe Lincoln problematic, you can guarantee someone will find an issue.
How can you tell other countries to stop modern day slavery whilst you have statues up of slave traders in your cities?
Statues in cities are there to be revered, there's no other way about it, many statues have been torn down in history, I just think people need to remember that and be grateful that it doesn't include a massacre of the 'other side'.
Obvious controversial statues such as the slave traders do belong in museums, Churchill? Personally I'd say that belongs in a museum too, and in a few generations when WW2 is much more of a distant memory I'm sure they will be in museums, but I can see why it would currently cause upset on the side that doesn't get upset (apparently).
Ultimately the problem is that we still have lots of people around like @Job who are vermin fascist fucks, (See complaining about EDL protests being shut down, then inciting violence against BLM protesters. Oh and also he has the right to tell authority to fuck off but poor black people can't.) and as soon as individuals in that generation dies out who sees their selves superior because of the tone of their skin, we'll finally be able to move on as a planet and hopefully be mature enough to become a 'multi-planet species'.
Until then, we're going to continue to fight over the same cake, rather than baking more.
Oh fuck off. Churchill? Con - Imperialist because he was born in the 19th century. Pro - Literally saved Britain and Western Europe (and arguably, the entire world) from the worst evil in history. And you're a history teacher? Sweet christ on a cracker.
#context.
Sure.
Selling slaves was also OK at one point, does that mean we ignore that too whilst spreading our hypocrisy across the world?
I'm a history teacher, IE, I give the facts and allow students to come to their own interpretations. I do not indoctrinate a false narrative of history 'because we won'.
Frankly, I'm finding it pretty boring and offensive that people think that because I share my personal opinions on here, it somehow means that I can't act professionally and be impartial. It's a fucking joke tbh.
But we're backwards looking. Should be forwards looking and concepts of national identity (rather than of shared human struggle in the face of greater challenges than ww2 presented - because much of them are challenges to change our very nature) must fall away if we are to progress...
I thought the whole point of Tropic Thunder was that blacking up was a cringey thing to do. You're laughing at the horrendous decision. Sort of like when you watch The Office and think 'Argh - What a prick!'