SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
38,015
Yep, but:
All both studies are saying is that the accelerating expansion *might* be slowing, but that doesn't mean the universe will stop expanding, just that it may eventually expand at a fixed rate (which is actually what people thought before Dark Energy was discovered).
If it's slowing, why would the slowing down stop and expansion happen stably? I.E. what would make a changing system become a stable system?

Also, if it's slowing, might it not get to a point where it stops? And if it stops, why not collapse back?

All these seem perfectly reasonable hypothesis.
 

Zarjazz

Identifies as a horologist.
Joined
Dec 11, 2003
Messages
2,450
why would the ... expansion happen stably?
The expansion originated with the Big Bang, you could call it one of the universe's initial conditions. It was believed that after the initial 'kick', that was it. It was during measurements in the 1980s that it was discovered that the rate of expansion appeared to be increasing. That was both an unexpected and unexplained result, that is still the case even now. The effect was labelled 'Dark Energy', since where is all that energy coming from to power that acceleration?

Also, if it's slowing, might it not get to a point where it stops? And if it stops, why not collapse back?
Fair, I did simplify a few things in my previous answer :) The whole reason for those original measurements was to answer exactly that question. They knew the universe was expanding after the Big Bang, but that was being counteracted by the force of gravity from all the mass in the universe. So they were trying to work out the precise numbers of each to see if the universe would slowly expand forever, reach a static state, or end in a Big Crunch. With the discovery of Dark Energy the answer seemed clear (though it wouldn't be a slow expansion, but one that got faster and faster). These latest measurements, if true, simply complicate the analysis even further. They do not say, unlike what the article is stating, what the final result will be.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
38,015
I didn't read the article closely @Zarjazz - just thought it was interesting. Me n you are on the same page with this :)
 

Embattle

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
13,974
I love using Google Earth Pro and using the historical imagery feature to go back in time, to see what areas looked like compared to now.
 

Deebs

Chief Arsewipe
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 11, 1997
Messages
9,077,393
I love using Google Earth Pro and using the historical imagery feature to go back in time, to see what areas looked like compared to now.
Oooh, how far back? Is it only since Google started mapping the Earth or they have even older images taken by others?
 

Embattle

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
13,974
Oooh, how far back? Is it only since Google started mapping the Earth or they have even older images taken by others?

The majority are 2000 onwards from Google, but there are some older images, like this one of where I used to live from 1945:

1945.jpg
 

Embattle

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
13,974
I've used this website to look at old maps before:


As an example, here is the same area from 1867:

1867.jpg
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
38,015
Cops again. Not ours this time:


rather than investigating allegations made against McSkimming, the police used accusatory emails sent by the complainant to charge her with sending harmful digital communications

Don't tell the po-po their mate is a paedo by email eh?
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
38,015

Overdriven

Dumpster Fire of The South
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
12,879
Guardian with their fearmongering.

The stats are something like 6% of people who use the CTW scheme earn 6 figures and less than that have a bike over 2k.

Fun innit.
 

Embattle

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
13,974
I think that is much the same reason there are rumours about changes to the Heat pumps scheme.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
38,015
Guardian with their fearmongering.

The stats are something like 6% of people who use the CTW scheme earn 6 figures and less than that have a bike over 2k.

Fun innit.
Still, they're going to be doing a lot less exercise than they once were eh?
 

Tom

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
17,548
No more cheap bikes or healthy transport @Tom:


It was costing the government very little - and even if was getting the comfortably off into the surrey hills then at least they were doing hard exercise after their sedentary, desk-bound weeks eh?

Some people have been taking the piss, but it's performative nonsense tbh. I've never been able to use it. I'm currently thinking of getting an e-bike though, something like this perhaps:


Sometimes cycling an hour or so with panniers through cold wind and rain to go teach kids how to ride on the roads for 7 hours, and then cycling back, gets a bit tiring. An e-bike would make things a bit nicer.
 

Deebs

Chief Arsewipe
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 11, 1997
Messages
9,077,393

Tom

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
17,548
Good video (crap sound in parts though). I've used e-cargo cycles around here, there was a hire scheme that ran from Stretford for a short period. Motorists tended to be more wary around me. The big challenge was just getting going - the steering I found very wobbly, it took a few miles to get used to. And once I was used to it, it was fine. And then when I got back on my normal bike, the steering was wobbly again :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom