Chilly
Balls of steel
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 9,047
You forgot to send the hooker home and she golden showered you again?I just came home after a 3 day booze cruise, i just showered and i still feel unclean
You forgot to send the hooker home and she golden showered you again?I just came home after a 3 day booze cruise, i just showered and i still feel unclean
For not keeping control of their dog for instance which they can now be done for on private property which they couldn't beforeBoth of them? On what grounds?
Lock up teh family tbfh.
There's been a change in the law for just this sort of thing. I want to see the grieving parents sent down.
Both of them? On what grounds?
For not keeping control of their dog for instance which they can now be done for on private property which they couldn't before
Think it's fair enough. Girl kicks him first, then he punches her. Girl takes a shot at his head, so he punches her. She falls back through the window.
If women want equality, then they should take responsibility for the consequences of their actions...
Couldn't agree more tbh. I'd never beat a woman, and if she was attacking me hysterically I would simply restrain her. however if, like in that video, it was a calculated attack, intended to do some damage I'd drop her too.
What a massive quim. If he has to punch a girl through a window because he got a little tap then he needs to seek help.
The point as it was then and as it is now. You cannot know this. This could be a dog they has been kicked and poked its whole life and used for nothing but fighting. If that is the case and a dog that has been trained to kill has killed someone it is a weapon and the person should be held responsible.They were wrong IMO. This case demonstrates it. A family pet - which I'm pretty sure the parents wouldn't have dreamed would have killed their little girl.
It depends how they have treated the dog. If they have been mean to the dog and not kept control of it then they deserve to be prosecuted if they are really just an out of character incident for the dog then they shouldn't but they will have to prove one way or the other which is how it should be.@BloodOmen was right tbh - but I did want to make a serious point.
We've had this discussion before - and a lot of people supported the harsher sentencing.
They were wrong IMO. This case demonstrates it. A family pet - which I'm pretty sure the parents wouldn't have dreamed would have killed their little girl.
Dogs have minds of their own. Prosecuting humans for what another animal does - unless that human deliberately set that animal on the other person - is ridiculous.
I should say this dose not look like a case of a fighting dog. So if the parents are charged with Manslaughter or anything really I will be surprised and agree with you.
So it could be a case that they got in over thier heads and the dog challenged the child. I am not sure how I feel if this is the case. Without know the parents experience with dogs I can't judge this. But no way I would get a dog bigger than my children.The Bordeaux has a good and calm temperament. It is extremely loyal, patient and devoted to his family. Fearless and confrontational with strangers, he is a first class watch and guard dog. Socialize very well with other animals, preferably starting from an early age to avoid him being aggressive with other dogs. The Dogue de Bordeaux snores and drools. Despite his fearsome appearance, the Dogue de Bordeaux is gentle with children and family members. However, this is a powerful animal, and is not suitable for an inexperienced dog owner. The objective in training this dog is to achieve pack leader status. It is a natural instinct for a dog to have an order in its pack. When we humans live with dogs, we become their pack. The entire pack cooperates under a single leader. Lines are clearly defined and rules are set. You and all other humans MUST be higher up in the order than the dog. That is the only way your relationship can be a success. This breed needs a calm, but firm owner who displays a natural authority over the dog. One who is confident and consistent.
Have you seen the dog? it doesn't look normal, it looks like its been fed steroids or something, its absolutely monstrous compared the girl
I am not sure how I feel if this is the case
Yeah but that is where we need to have faith in the legal systemThe papers would be baying for a nice long sentence if this "not fighting dog" had killed a random in a park - and so would their parents.
It depends how they have treated the dog. If they have been mean to the dog and not kept control of it then they deserve to be prosecuted if they are really just an out of character incident for the dog then they shouldn't but they will have to prove one way or the other which is how it should be.