- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 38,991
Whilst I like the other stuff you said (and I'll have a look at it) - this is absolutely a question of optics. If you previously funded NASA and all the engineers there, and then you defund NASA and give government contracts to private companies, who hire the engineers, then whether you call it subsidy or not is kind of irrelevant.SpaceX and Blue Origin aren't being subsidised - they're being paid to develop cheap, reliable launch systems at massive savings to the taxpayer.
Ultimately SpaceX will own the technology - not the public. Despite the public paying through government contracts.
Edit: Now, whether we're arguing about whether the outcomes are better...




