SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

Gwadien

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,852
Moriath said:
Nope we as in the part of the public who have seen this can happen multiple times in the last few months and still see people continue to book holidays and are surprised when the changes happen. Then complain about it.

they know they are taking a risk and just dont like it when that risk doesnt pay off.

why should i be sympathetic to these people who have all these facts at hand and still do it. If they wanted a risk free holiday doit in the uk.

if you are not part of that we then so be it. I don’t think I am alone.

2019 i visited 3 continents and 6 different countries. I have nothing against travel. Its the gambling with the system and moaning about it when you lose

yes that travel killed the planet a bit more. Im sorry
Click to expand...

So yes leaders, I agree with you /bow.

Are you going to address the system the Government has come up with or just ignore that pretty important part of my reply?

You can criticise it you know and consider it unfair.
 
Bodhi

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,309
MYstIC G said:
www.euronews.com

Bottled water is 3,500 times worse for the environment than tap water

It may not be shocking that bottled water is bad for the environment, but scientists have crunched the numbers to work out exactly how much worse it is.
www.euronews.com www.euronews.com

:(
Click to expand...

Sadly we have to buy it as what comes out of the tap round here is pretty much just a constant stream of limescale. The wife's lived round here all her life so has got used to it, but after living in Scotland and next to the Volvic spring I'm not prepared to drink that furry pish.
 
Moriath

Moriath

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
16,209
Gwadien said:
So yes leaders, I agree with you /bow.

Are you going to address the system the Government has come up with or just ignore that pretty important part of my reply?

You can criticise it you know and consider it unfair.
Click to expand...
I am ok with the system. You?
 
Moriath

Moriath

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
16,209
Bodhi said:
Sadly we have to buy it as what comes out of the tap round here is pretty much just a constant stream of limescale. The wife's lived round here all her life so has got used to it, but after living in Scotland and next to the Volvic spring I'm not prepared to drink that furry pish.
Click to expand...
Water with minerals isnt bad for you. Even in hard water areas. Its what you have become accustomed to compared to bottled. I came from hertfordshire everything limescaled up. Water was fine to drink. First world problems
 
Moriath

Moriath

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
16,209
Scouse said:
My missus buys lots and lots and lots of sparkling water. :(
Click to expand...
In wales. Not exactly chalk country. Could go find a stream and it would be fresher and less bacteria filled than that shit in supermarkets
 
Lamp

Lamp

Gold Star Holder!!
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
23,062
Make yourself something healthy for breakfast
*12 minutes later*
What did you have
Strawberries
Good !
(Strawberry Carte d'Or Ice Cream)
:eek6:
 
Bodhi

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,309
Moriath said:
Water with minerals isnt bad for you. Even in hard water areas. Its what you have become accustomed to compared to bottled. I came from hertfordshire everything limescaled up. Water was fine to drink. First world problems
Click to expand...

I don't give a shit about the health implications dear boy, I won't drink it because it tastes revolting and leaves my mouth feeling like something has died in it.
 
Scouse

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,292
Gwadien said:
And you're bothered about the left? (not even far left)

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
I'm fucked off by the left - because I think that if they actually got power they are much more likely to enact laws that benefit the environment than than the tories.

But their problem is they can't get in power because they're a bunch of oppressive cunts who can't say "OK - we'll ditch our deep desire to control everything and everyone because the prizes of social justice, equality and progress on environmental legislation and action are much much more important than us thought-criming the fuck out of everyone".


But it isn't. The thought-crime thing is the MOST important thing to lefties. So the environment is still getting shat on.

Edit:
The evidence on that is clear btw - look how much OUTRAGE there is over what people say on social media, as opposed to all the pollution, devestation and outright environmental criminality there is the world over.

Admit that you don't use the word fag any more though and you're a fucking cunt pariah.
 
Scouse

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,292
Gwadien said:
hahaha
Click to expand...
Good argument m8.

I notice you've still not provided an argument for what we gain.

Or, frankly, an argument for why Labour can't get into power even with a massively populist leftie front and centre (and now look like they're going backwards under the current tory-lite guy).

Labour needs to take a long hard look at themselves tbh. And it ain't happening.
 
Scouse

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,292
Embattle said:
www.politico.eu

EU aims to slice up global fish rules in its favor

Europe is at odds with African, Caribbean and Pacific countries over who should be exempt from rules meant to crack down on overfishing.
www.politico.eu www.politico.eu
Click to expand...
“The ‘sustainability’ condition is weak and the major subsidizers will be able to satisfy the condition easily,” Jamaica’s Foreign Minister Kamina Johnson-Smith said at a meeting last month on behalf of the ACP group. “We regard this provision as a loophole for major subsidizers and we would prefer its deletion."
Click to expand...

So, rather than push for an enhanced sustainability requirement - which would ramp up the pressure on the EU - they want it deleted, so they can go about their business in non-sustainable fashion.

Pot / Kettle tbh.
 
Aoami

Aoami

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
11,223
sunbeamsoutofcucumbers.substack.com

What ever happened to that Spectator article about Marcus Rashford?

You may recall the hoo-hah the other week about Marcus Rashford and a Spectator story. Rashford tweeted that the Spectator were preparing to run a story about him but strangely the story then never appeared. So what was it all about, and what happened to the story? Well I’ll have to take you...
sunbeamsoutofcucumbers.substack.com sunbeamsoutofcucumbers.substack.com

lol
 
Scouse

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,292
Moriath said:
unless governments force through unpopular things that are supported by all parties then the popular vote is always going to push a country away from climate issues.
Click to expand...
So the problem is humans being retards.

We don't make it (obvs). And it's our own fault for not being intelligent enough to demand what is necessary.
 
Bodhi

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,309
Aoami said:
sunbeamsoutofcucumbers.substack.com

What ever happened to that Spectator article about Marcus Rashford?

You may recall the hoo-hah the other week about Marcus Rashford and a Spectator story. Rashford tweeted that the Spectator were preparing to run a story about him but strangely the story then never appeared. So what was it all about, and what happened to the story? Well I’ll have to take you...
sunbeamsoutofcucumbers.substack.com sunbeamsoutofcucumbers.substack.com

lol
Click to expand...

So from what I can tell of that rambling mess of a blog:

- Magazine asks for stories
- Unknown blogger who is "bored in lockdown" decides to make a story up and strings some journalists on for a while, wasting their time
- Magazine finds out story isn't accurate, realises they aren't The Byline Times so decide not to publish something with no basis in fact
- World forgets about it 2 days later

Whilst I have little time for the media in general, I'm struggling to see The Spectator as the bad guys in all of that tbh.
 
Aoami

Aoami

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
11,223
Bodhi said:
So from what I can tell of that rambling mess of a blog:

- Magazine asks for stories
- Unknown blogger who is "bored in lockdown" decides to make a story up and strings some journalists on for a while, wasting their time
- Magazine finds out story isn't accurate, realises they aren't The Byline Times so decide not to publish something with no basis in fact
- World forgets about it 2 days later

Whilst I have little time for the media in general, I'm struggling to see The Spectator as the bad guys in all of that tbh.
Click to expand...

Really?

The Spectator, a rag that considers itself one of one last bastions of true journalism, is completely duped by an anonymous tipster after asking people for "woke stories", and then does absolutely no diligence because they're salivating at the content?
 
Bodhi

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,309
Aoami said:
Really?

The Spectator, a rag that considers itself one of one last bastions of true journalism, is completely duped by an anonymous tipster after asking people for "woke stories", and then does absolutely no diligence because they're salivating at the content?
Click to expand...

If they'd done "absolutely no dilligence" then it would be currently available on The Spectator website for us to read. As it isn't, it looks like their checks and balances are working, albeit a bit late.

As it is, the link you posted is basically "Publisher decides not to print story they find out isn't true". Weather at 11.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 1, guests: 2)
Top Bottom